Suppr超能文献

儿科心脏移植候选者1A状态例外情况使用的地区差异:这公平吗?

Regional variation in the use of 1A status exceptions for pediatric heart transplant candidates: is this equitable?

作者信息

Godown Justin, McKane Meghann, Wujcik Kari A, Mettler Bret A, Dodd Debra A

机构信息

Pediatric Cardiology, Monroe Carell Jr. Children's Hospital at Vanderbilt, Nashville, TN, USA.

Pediatric Cardiology, Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, Atlanta, GA, USA.

出版信息

Pediatr Transplant. 2017 Feb;21(1). doi: 10.1111/petr.12784. Epub 2016 Aug 23.

Abstract

The use of status exceptions (SE) was recently publicized as a strategy to reduce waitlist times for children awaiting heart transplant (HTx). The aim of this study was to assess SE use across UNOS regions and compare survival in patients listed using a SE to those listed by standard criteria. The OPTN database was queried for all pediatric patients listed for HTx (2000-2014). SE use was compared across UNOS regions. Survival curves were generated and compared using the log-rank test. 1A SE use is uncommon, being utilized in 108 of 4587 pediatric 1A listings (2.4%). There is significant variability in SE use across UNOS regions (0.7%-16.4% of 1A listings, P < .001). Waitlist survival is significantly higher in candidates listed using a 1A SE compared to those listed by standard criteria (P = .001) and is similar to 1B listings. Regional variation in 1A SE use has the potential to introduce bias into a system designed to be equitable. Waitlist survival in patients listed using a SE is similar to those listed status 1B, suggesting these patients may not require 1A status. Careful review of pediatric heart allocation policies is needed to optimize patient outcomes and ensure a fair and unbiased allocation system.

摘要

最近,状态例外(SE)的使用作为一种减少等待心脏移植(HTx)儿童等待名单时间的策略被公开。本研究的目的是评估器官共享联合网络(UNOS)各区域的SE使用情况,并比较使用SE列入名单的患者与按标准标准列入名单的患者的生存率。对OPTN数据库中所有列入HTx名单的儿科患者(2000 - 2014年)进行查询。比较了UNOS各区域的SE使用情况。使用对数秩检验生成并比较生存曲线。1A类SE的使用并不常见,在4587例儿科1A类名单中有108例使用(2.4%)。UNOS各区域的SE使用存在显著差异(1A类名单的0.7% - 16.4%,P <.001)。与按标准标准列入名单的候选人相比,使用1A类SE列入名单的候选人等待名单生存率显著更高(P =.001),且与1B类名单相似。1A类SE使用的区域差异有可能给旨在公平的系统引入偏差。使用SE列入名单的患者的等待名单生存率与列入1B状态的患者相似,这表明这些患者可能不需要1A状态。需要仔细审查儿科心脏分配政策,以优化患者结局并确保公平且无偏差的分配系统。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验