Slanger Tracy E, Gross J Valérie, Pinger Andreas, Morfeld Peter, Bellinger Miriam, Duhme Anna-Lena, Reichardt Ortega Rosalinde Amancay, Costa Giovanni, Driscoll Tim R, Foster Russell G, Fritschi Lin, Sallinen Mikael, Liira Juha, Erren Thomas C
Institute and Policlinic for Occupational Medicine, Environmental Medicine and Preventive Research, University of Cologne, Kerpener Str. 62, Cologne, Germany, 50937.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Aug 23;2016(8):CD010641. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010641.pub2.
Shift work is often associated with sleepiness and sleep disorders. Person-directed, non-pharmacological interventions may positively influence the impact of shift work on sleep, thereby improving workers' well-being, safety, and health.
To assess the effects of person-directed, non-pharmacological interventions for reducing sleepiness at work and improving the length and quality of sleep between shifts for shift workers.
We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE Ovid, Embase, Web of Knowledge, ProQuest, PsycINFO, OpenGrey, and OSH-UPDATE from inception to August 2015. We also screened reference lists and conference proceedings and searched the World Health Organization (WHO) Trial register. We contacted experts to obtain unpublished data.
Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) (including cross-over designs) that investigated the effect of any person-directed, non-pharmacological intervention on sleepiness on-shift or sleep length and sleep quality off-shift in shift workers who also work nights.
At least two authors screened titles and abstracts for relevant studies, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias. We contacted authors to obtain missing information. We conducted meta-analyses when pooling of studies was possible.
We included 17 relevant trials (with 556 review-relevant participants) which we categorised into three types of interventions: (1) various exposures to bright light (n = 10); (2) various opportunities for napping (n = 4); and (3) other interventions, such as physical exercise or sleep education (n = 3). In most instances, the studies were too heterogeneous to pool. Most of the comparisons yielded low to very low quality evidence. Only one comparison provided moderate quality evidence. Overall, the included studies' results were inconclusive. We present the results regarding sleepiness below. Bright light Combining two comparable studies (with 184 participants altogether) that investigated the effect of bright light during the night on sleepiness during a shift, revealed a mean reduction 0.83 score points of sleepiness (measured via the Stanford Sleepiness Scale (SSS) (95% confidence interval (CI) -1.3 to -0.36, very low quality evidence). Another trial did not find a significant difference in overall sleepiness on another sleepiness scale (16 participants, low quality evidence).Bright light during the night plus sunglasses at dawn did not significantly influence sleepiness compared to normal light (1 study, 17 participants, assessment via reaction time, very low quality evidence).Bright light during the day shift did not significantly reduce sleepiness during the day compared to normal light (1 trial, 61 participants, subjective assessment, low quality evidence) or compared to normal light plus placebo capsule (1 trial, 12 participants, assessment via reaction time, very low quality evidence). Napping during the night shiftA meta-analysis on a single nap opportunity and the effect on the mean reaction time as a surrogate for sleepiness, resulted in a 11.87 ms reduction (95% CI 31.94 to -8.2, very low quality evidence). Two other studies also reported statistically non-significant decreases in reaction time (1 study seven participants; 1 study 49 participants, very low quality evidence).A two-nap opportunity resulted in a statistically non-significant increase of sleepiness (subjective assessment) in one study (mean difference (MD) 2.32, 95% CI -24.74 to 29.38, 1 study, 15 participants, low quality evidence). Other interventionsPhysical exercise and sleep education interventions showed promise, but sufficient data to draw conclusions are lacking.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Given the methodological diversity of the included studies, in terms of interventions, settings, and assessment tools, their limited reporting and the very low to low quality of the evidence they present, it is not possible to determine whether shift workers' sleepiness can be reduced or if their sleep length or quality can be improved with these interventions.We need better and adequately powered RCTs of the effect of bright light, and naps, either on their own or together and other non-pharmacological interventions that also consider shift workers' chronobiology on the investigated sleep parameters.
轮班工作常与困倦及睡眠障碍相关。针对个人的非药物干预可能会对轮班工作对睡眠的影响产生积极作用,从而改善工人的幸福感、安全性和健康状况。
评估针对个人的非药物干预对减少轮班工人工作时的困倦感以及改善其轮班间隙睡眠时间和质量的效果。
我们检索了截至2015年8月的Cochrane系统评价数据库(CENTRAL)、Ovid平台的MEDLINE、Embase、Web of Knowledge、ProQuest、PsycINFO、OpenGrey以及职业安全与健康更新数据库(OSH-UPDATE)。我们还筛选了参考文献列表和会议论文集,并检索了世界卫生组织(WHO)试验注册库。我们联系了专家以获取未发表的数据。
随机对照试验(RCTs)(包括交叉设计),这些试验研究了任何针对个人的非药物干预对从事夜间工作的轮班工人工作时的困倦感或轮班间隙睡眠时间和睡眠质量的影响。
至少两名作者筛选标题和摘要以寻找相关研究,提取数据并评估偏倚风险。我们联系作者以获取缺失信息。当可以合并研究时,我们进行了荟萃分析。
我们纳入了17项相关试验(共556名与综述相关的参与者),这些试验分为三种干预类型:(1)各种强光照射(n = 10);(2)各种小睡机会(n = 4);(3)其他干预措施,如体育锻炼或睡眠教育(n = 3)。在大多数情况下,研究的异质性过高,无法合并。大多数比较产生的证据质量低至极低。只有一项比较提供了中等质量的证据。总体而言,纳入研究的结果尚无定论。我们在下面列出关于困倦感的结果。强光照射 综合两项可比研究(共184名参与者),这两项研究调查了夜间强光对轮班期间困倦感的影响,结果显示困倦感平均降低0.83分(通过斯坦福嗜睡量表(SSS)测量)(95%置信区间(CI)-1.3至-0.36,极低质量证据)。另一项试验在另一种嗜睡量表上未发现总体困倦感有显著差异(16名参与者,低质量证据)。与正常光线相比,夜间强光加黎明时分戴太阳镜对困倦感没有显著影响(1项研究,17名参与者,通过反应时间评估,极低质量证据)。与正常光线相比,日班期间的强光并未显著降低白天的困倦感(1项试验,61名参与者,主观评估,低质量证据),或者与正常光线加安慰剂胶囊相比也未显著降低困倦感(1项试验,12名参与者,通过反应时间评估,极低质量证据)。夜班期间小睡 对单次小睡机会及其对作为困倦感替代指标的平均反应时间的影响进行的荟萃分析显示,反应时间减少了11.87毫秒(95% CI 31.94至-8.2,极低质量证据)。另外两项研究也报告了反应时间在统计学上无显著下降(1项研究7名参与者;1项研究49名参与者,极低质量证据)。一项研究中,两次小睡机会导致困倦感在统计学上无显著增加(主观评估)(平均差(MD)2.32,95% CI -24.74至29.38,1项研究,15名参与者,低质量证据)。其他干预措施 体育锻炼和睡眠教育干预措施显示出一定前景,但缺乏足够的数据来得出结论。
鉴于纳入研究在干预措施、研究环境和评估工具方面方法的多样性,其报告有限,且所提供证据的质量低至极低,因此无法确定这些干预措施是否能减少轮班工人的困倦感,或者是否能改善他们的睡眠时间或质量。我们需要更好的、有足够样本量的随机对照试验,来研究强光、小睡单独或联合使用的效果,以及其他也考虑轮班工人时间生物学的非药物干预措施对所研究睡眠参数的影响。