• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

支具对骨质疏松性椎体骨折的影响:一项荟萃分析。

Effect of Brace to Osteoporotic Vertebral Fracture: a Meta-Analysis.

作者信息

Jin Yuan Zhe, Lee Jae Hyup

机构信息

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, College of Medicine, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea.

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, SMG-SNU Boramae Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

J Korean Med Sci. 2016 Oct;31(10):1641-9. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2016.31.10.1641.

DOI:10.3346/jkms.2016.31.10.1641
PMID:27550495
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4999409/
Abstract

Brace is one of the most commonly used interventions to manage osteoporotic vertebral fracture. However, its authentic effectiveness remains unclear. The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of brace in patients with osteoporotic vertebral fractures. We conducted a literature review and meta-analysis following the guideline and handbook of the Cochrane collaboration. Ten published articles were included in this study and data from 4 randomized controlled trials were analyzed. Low quality evidence proved using Spinomed brace could bring large and significant beneficial effect to patients with sub-acute osteoporotic vertebral fractures. Very low quality evidence proved no significant difference between Spinomed orthosis, rigid brace and soft brace when they were used in patients with acute fractures. Therefore, it might be applicable to recommend middle term use of Spinomed orthosis to patients with subacute fracture. In addition, this study emphasized the need for high quality randomized controlled trials.

摘要

支具是治疗骨质疏松性椎体骨折最常用的干预措施之一。然而,其实际疗效仍不明确。本研究的目的是探讨支具治疗骨质疏松性椎体骨折患者的疗效。我们按照Cochrane协作网的指南和手册进行了文献综述和荟萃分析。本研究纳入了10篇已发表的文章,并分析了4项随机对照试验的数据。低质量证据表明,使用Spinomed支具可为亚急性骨质疏松性椎体骨折患者带来显著的有益效果。极低质量证据表明,Spinomed矫形器、硬支具和软支具在急性骨折患者中使用时无显著差异。因此,对于亚急性骨折患者,推荐中期使用Spinomed矫形器可能是适用的。此外,本研究强调了高质量随机对照试验的必要性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2328/4999409/f9c7205ae253/jkms-31-1641-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2328/4999409/f9fe2ded81f8/jkms-31-1641-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2328/4999409/7fc1075ab58c/jkms-31-1641-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2328/4999409/579312a4a21b/jkms-31-1641-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2328/4999409/5e3b28ce7ff2/jkms-31-1641-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2328/4999409/f9c7205ae253/jkms-31-1641-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2328/4999409/f9fe2ded81f8/jkms-31-1641-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2328/4999409/7fc1075ab58c/jkms-31-1641-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2328/4999409/579312a4a21b/jkms-31-1641-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2328/4999409/5e3b28ce7ff2/jkms-31-1641-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2328/4999409/f9c7205ae253/jkms-31-1641-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Effect of Brace to Osteoporotic Vertebral Fracture: a Meta-Analysis.支具对骨质疏松性椎体骨折的影响:一项荟萃分析。
J Korean Med Sci. 2016 Oct;31(10):1641-9. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2016.31.10.1641.
2
A comparison study on the efficacy of SpinoMed® and soft lumbar orthosis for osteoporotic vertebral fracture.SpinoMed®与软性腰部矫形器治疗骨质疏松性椎体骨折疗效的比较研究
Prosthet Orthot Int. 2015 Aug;39(4):270-6. doi: 10.1177/0309364614528204. Epub 2014 Apr 7.
3
Dynamic corset versus three-point brace in the treatment of osteoporotic compression fractures of the thoracic and lumbar spine: a prospective, comparative study.动态束腹带与三点式支具治疗胸腰椎骨质疏松性压缩骨折的前瞻性对比研究
Aging Clin Exp Res. 2017 Jun;29(3):443-449. doi: 10.1007/s40520-016-0602-x. Epub 2016 Jul 8.
4
Bracing for Acute and Subacute Osteoporotic Compression Fractures: A Systematic Review of the Literature.应对急性和亚急性骨质疏松性压缩性骨折:文献系统评价。
World Neurosurg. 2020 Sep;141:e453-e460. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2020.05.199. Epub 2020 May 28.
5
Comparative study of the treatment outcomes of osteoporotic compression fractures without neurologic injury using a rigid brace, a soft brace, and no brace: a prospective randomized controlled non-inferiority trial.使用刚性支具、软性支具和不使用支具治疗无神经损伤的骨质疏松性压缩骨折的疗效比较研究:一项前瞻性随机对照非劣效性试验。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014 Dec 3;96(23):1959-66. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.N.00187.
6
Osteoporotic vertebral fractures: current concepts of conservative care.骨质疏松性椎体骨折:保守治疗的现状。
Br Med Bull. 2012 Jun;102:171-89. doi: 10.1093/bmb/ldr048. Epub 2011 Nov 29.
7
Spinal Orthoses for Vertebral Osteoporosis and Osteoporotic Vertebral Fracture: A Systematic Review.用于椎体骨质疏松症和骨质疏松性椎体骨折的脊柱矫形器:一项系统评价
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2016 Jun;97(6):1013-25. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2015.10.108. Epub 2015 Nov 23.
8
Wearing an active spinal orthosis improves back extensor strength in women with osteoporotic vertebral fractures.佩戴动态脊柱矫形器可增强患有骨质疏松性椎体骨折女性的背部伸肌力量。
Prosthet Orthot Int. 2014 Jun;38(3):232-8. doi: 10.1177/0309364613497393. Epub 2013 Aug 28.
9
[Orthotic methods for osteoporosis and osteoporotic vertebral fracture].[骨质疏松症及骨质疏松性椎体骨折的矫形方法]
Orthopade. 2010 Apr;39(4):387-96. doi: 10.1007/s00132-010-1596-2.
10
[Exercise therapy and bracing in patients with osteoporotic compression vertebral fractures].[骨质疏松性压缩性椎体骨折患者的运动疗法与支具治疗]
Vopr Kurortol Fizioter Lech Fiz Kult. 2019;96(4):69-75. doi: 10.17116/kurort20199604169.

引用本文的文献

1
Efficacy of different spinal orthoses for pain management, functional improvement, and quality of life in osteoporotic vertebral fractures: a mini review.不同脊柱矫形器对骨质疏松性椎体骨折疼痛管理、功能改善及生活质量的疗效:一项小型综述
Front Rehabil Sci. 2024 Dec 23;5:1506279. doi: 10.3389/fresc.2024.1506279. eCollection 2024.
2
Effect of spinal orthoses on osteoporotic elderly patients kyphosis, back muscles strength, balance and osteoporotic vertebral fractures: (A systematic review and meta-analysis).脊柱矫形器对骨质疏松老年患者驼背、背部肌肉力量、平衡及骨质疏松性椎体骨折的影响:(一项系统评价与荟萃分析)
J Rehabil Assist Technol Eng. 2024 Aug 25;11:20556683241268605. doi: 10.1177/20556683241268605. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Spinal Orthoses for Vertebral Osteoporosis and Osteoporotic Vertebral Fracture: A Systematic Review.用于椎体骨质疏松症和骨质疏松性椎体骨折的脊柱矫形器:一项系统评价
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2016 Jun;97(6):1013-25. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2015.10.108. Epub 2015 Nov 23.
2
2015 Updated Method Guideline for Systematic Reviews in the Cochrane Back and Neck Group.2015年Cochrane背部和颈部组系统评价方法更新指南。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2015 Nov;40(21):1660-73. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001061.
3
The efficacy of conservative treatment of osteoporotic compression fractures on acute pain relief: a systematic review with meta-analysis.
Multiple Vertebral Compression Fractures Secondary to Pregnancy-induced Osteoporosis: A Case Report.妊娠性骨质疏松继发多节段椎体压缩性骨折:一例报告
J Orthop Case Rep. 2024 Jun;14(6):101-107. doi: 10.13107/jocr.2024.v14.i06.4518.
4
Research of Global Tilt and Functional Independence: Insights into Spinal Health of Older Women.全球倾斜度与功能独立性研究:对老年女性脊柱健康的见解
Bioengineering (Basel). 2024 May 16;11(5):493. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering11050493.
5
FGF2/HGF priming facilitates adipose-derived stem cell-mediated bone formation in osteoporotic defects.成纤维细胞生长因子2/肝细胞生长因子预处理促进脂肪来源干细胞介导的骨质疏松性缺损骨形成。
Heliyon. 2024 Jan 17;10(2):e24554. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e24554. eCollection 2024 Jan 30.
6
Role of biophysical stimulation in multimodal management of vertebral compression fractures.生物物理刺激在椎体压缩骨折多模式治疗中的作用
Comput Struct Biotechnol J. 2023 Nov 14;21:5650-5661. doi: 10.1016/j.csbj.2023.11.023. eCollection 2023.
7
Spinal orthoses in osteoporotic vertebral fractures of the elderly.脊柱矫形器在老年骨质疏松性椎体骨折中的应用
J Spine Surg. 2023 Sep 22;9(3):224-228. doi: 10.21037/jss-23-76. Epub 2023 Jun 29.
8
First Ecuadorian statement consensus for the evaluation and treatment of osteoporosis.厄瓜多尔首份骨质疏松评估和治疗共识声明。
Arch Osteoporos. 2023 Jun 15;18(1):81. doi: 10.1007/s11657-023-01263-5.
9
Spinal Orthoses in the Treatment of Osteoporotic Thoracolumbar Vertebral Fractures in the Elderly: A Systematic Review With Quantitative Quality Assessment.脊柱矫形器治疗老年骨质疏松性胸腰椎椎体骨折:一项具有定量质量评估的系统综述
Global Spine J. 2023 Apr;13(1_suppl):59S-72S. doi: 10.1177/21925682221130048.
10
Bracing and taping interventions for individuals with vertebral fragility fractures: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials with GRADE assessment.脊柱脆弱性骨折患者的支具和绷带干预:系统评价随机对照试验并进行 GRADE 评估。
Arch Osteoporos. 2023 Feb 25;18(1):36. doi: 10.1007/s11657-023-01224-y.
骨质疏松性压缩骨折保守治疗对急性疼痛缓解的疗效:一项荟萃分析的系统评价
Eur Spine J. 2015 Apr;24(4):702-14. doi: 10.1007/s00586-015-3821-5. Epub 2015 Mar 1.
4
Comparative study of the treatment outcomes of osteoporotic compression fractures without neurologic injury using a rigid brace, a soft brace, and no brace: a prospective randomized controlled non-inferiority trial.使用刚性支具、软性支具和不使用支具治疗无神经损伤的骨质疏松性压缩骨折的疗效比较研究:一项前瞻性随机对照非劣效性试验。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014 Dec 3;96(23):1959-66. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.N.00187.
5
Prospective study of spinal orthoses in women.女性脊柱矫形器的前瞻性研究。
Prosthet Orthot Int. 2015 Dec;39(6):487-95. doi: 10.1177/0309364614545416. Epub 2014 Aug 19.
6
Osteoporosis and fragility fractures: Vertebral fractures.骨质疏松症和脆性骨折:脊柱骨折。
Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2013 Dec;27(6):743-55. doi: 10.1016/j.berh.2014.01.002.
7
A comparison study on the efficacy of SpinoMed® and soft lumbar orthosis for osteoporotic vertebral fracture.SpinoMed®与软性腰部矫形器治疗骨质疏松性椎体骨折疗效的比较研究
Prosthet Orthot Int. 2015 Aug;39(4):270-6. doi: 10.1177/0309364614528204. Epub 2014 Apr 7.
8
Opioids compared with placebo or other treatments for chronic low back pain: an update of the Cochrane Review.阿片类药物与安慰剂或其他治疗方法治疗慢性腰痛的比较:Cochrane系统评价的更新
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2014 Apr 1;39(7):556-63. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000249.
9
Wearing an active spinal orthosis improves back extensor strength in women with osteoporotic vertebral fractures.佩戴动态脊柱矫形器可增强患有骨质疏松性椎体骨折女性的背部伸肌力量。
Prosthet Orthot Int. 2014 Jun;38(3):232-8. doi: 10.1177/0309364613497393. Epub 2013 Aug 28.
10
Effects of conservative treatment for osteoporotic thoracolumbal spine fractures.骨质疏松性胸腰椎骨折保守治疗的效果
Mater Sociomed. 2012;24(1):16-20. doi: 10.5455/msm.2012.24.16-20.