La Maida Giovanni Andrea, Luceri Francesco, Ferraro Marcello, Ruosi Carlo, Mineo Giuseppe Vincenzo, Misaggi Bernardo
Spine Surgery Department, Orthopaedic Institute "Gaetano Pini", Milan, Italy.
University of Milan, Italy.
Injury. 2016 Oct;47 Suppl 4:S35-S43. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2016.07.052. Epub 2016 Aug 21.
The anatomy and biomechanics of the thoracolumbar spine place these segments at high risk of trauma injuries. Treatment options are either conservative or surgical, and there is a lack of consensus about the right indications. International scientific publications agree only on basic surgical principles: vertebral stability, deformity correction, protection of neurological structures and fast functional recovery. The most commonly used approach is the posterior approach, which allows the best management of most vertebral fracture patterns. The aim of this study was to compare clinical and radiological outcomes of monosegmental stabilisation with those of bisegmental stabilisation and fusion in the treatment of traumatic thoracolumbar spine fractures.
This retrospective clinical and radiological study evaluated 48 consecutive patients treated with monosegmental (Group M; n=14) or bisegmental (Group B; n=34) posterior pedicular instrumentation for thoracolumbar fractures. Fractures were classified by the new AO Spine TLIC system. Average follow-up was 30 months. Clinical outcomes in both groups were statistically compared. Radiological outcomes were evaluated in terms of vertebral anterior body height restoration and correction of the kyphotic deformity.
Radiographical results showed no statistically significant difference between the two groups in vertebral body height restoration and correction of the kyphotic deformity. The mean postoperative somatic vertebral anterior body height in Group M was 25.8±4.52mm and in Group B it was 24.43±4.27mm. In Group M the mean postoperative kyphotic deformity was 11.10±5.71°, in Group B it was 9.09±4.93°.
The results of this study confirm the validity of short and very short instrumentation for the treatment of well-selected type A and B vertebral fractures. In C type fractures correct surgical indication must be evaluated on an individual basis.
胸腰椎的解剖结构和生物力学特点使这些节段极易遭受创伤性损伤。治疗方法包括保守治疗和手术治疗,对于正确的适应症缺乏共识。国际科学出版物仅在基本手术原则上达成一致:椎体稳定性、畸形矫正、神经结构保护和快速功能恢复。最常用的方法是后路手术,它能对大多数椎体骨折类型进行最佳处理。本研究的目的是比较单节段固定与双节段固定及融合术治疗创伤性胸腰椎骨折的临床和影像学结果。
这项回顾性临床和影像学研究评估了48例连续接受单节段(M组;n = 14)或双节段(B组;n = 34)后路椎弓根内固定治疗胸腰椎骨折的患者。骨折采用新的AO脊柱胸腰椎损伤分类及严重程度评分(TLIC)系统进行分类。平均随访时间为30个月。对两组的临床结果进行统计学比较。从椎体前缘高度恢复和后凸畸形矫正方面评估影像学结果。
影像学结果显示,两组在椎体高度恢复和后凸畸形矫正方面无统计学显著差异。M组术后椎体前缘平均高度为25.8±4.52mm,B组为24.43±4.27mm。M组术后平均后凸畸形为11.10±5.71°,B组为9.09±4.93°。
本研究结果证实了短节段和极短节段内固定治疗精心选择的A型和B型椎体骨折的有效性。对于C型骨折,必须根据个体情况评估正确的手术适应症。