• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

移动心理健康:应对数字工具的新规则和法规

Mobile Mental Health: Navigating New Rules and Regulations for Digital Tools.

作者信息

Armontrout James, Torous John, Fisher Matthew, Drogin Eric, Gutheil Thomas

机构信息

University of California, San Francisco, 401 Parnassus Avenue Box PLP-0984, San Francisco, CA, 94143-0984, USA.

Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, 330 Brookline Ave E/Rabb 2, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.

出版信息

Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2016 Oct;18(10):91. doi: 10.1007/s11920-016-0726-x.

DOI:10.1007/s11920-016-0726-x
PMID:27553979
Abstract

Mobile health (mHealth) apps are becoming much more widely available. As more patients learn about and download apps, clinicians are sure to face more questions about the role these apps can play in treatment. Clinicians thus need to familiarize themselves with the clinical and legal risks that apps may introduce. Regulatory rules and organizations that oversee the safety and efficacy of mHealth apps are currently fragmentary in nature and clinicians should pay special attention to categories of apps which are currently exempt from significant regulation. Uniform HIPAA protection does not apply to personal health data that are shared with apps in many contexts which creates a number of clinically relevant privacy and security concerns. Clinicians should also consider several relatively novel potential adverse clinical outcomes and liability concerns that may be relevant to specific categories of apps, including apps that target (i) medication adherence, (ii) collection of self-reported data, (iii) collection of passive data, and (iv) generation of treatment recommendations for psychotherapeutic and behavioral interventions. Considering these potential pitfalls (and disclosing them to patients as a part of obtaining informed consent) is necessary as clinicians consider incorporating apps into treatment.

摘要

移动医疗(mHealth)应用程序正变得越来越普及。随着越来越多的患者了解并下载应用程序,临床医生肯定会面临更多关于这些应用程序在治疗中所起作用的问题。因此,临床医生需要熟悉应用程序可能带来的临床和法律风险。目前,监管移动医疗应用程序安全性和有效性的规则及组织本质上是零散的,临床医生应特别关注目前免于严格监管的应用程序类别。在许多情况下,统一的《健康保险流通与责任法案》(HIPAA)保护不适用于与应用程序共享的个人健康数据,这引发了一些与临床相关的隐私和安全问题。临床医生还应考虑一些相对新颖的潜在不良临床后果以及与特定类别应用程序相关的责任问题,这些应用程序包括针对(i)药物依从性、(ii)自我报告数据收集、(iii)被动数据收集以及(iv)心理治疗和行为干预治疗建议生成的应用程序。在临床医生考虑将应用程序纳入治疗时,考虑这些潜在的陷阱(并将其告知患者作为获得知情同意的一部分)是必要的。

相似文献

1
Mobile Mental Health: Navigating New Rules and Regulations for Digital Tools.移动心理健康:应对数字工具的新规则和法规
Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2016 Oct;18(10):91. doi: 10.1007/s11920-016-0726-x.
2
Mobile health applications: the patchwork of legal and liability issues suggests strategies to improve oversight.移动医疗应用程序:法律和责任问题的拼凑表明了加强监督的策略。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2014 Feb;33(2):222-7. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2013.0958.
3
Privacy and security in mobile health apps: a review and recommendations.移动健康应用中的隐私与安全:综述与建议
J Med Syst. 2015 Jan;39(1):181. doi: 10.1007/s10916-014-0181-3. Epub 2014 Dec 7.
4
The Use of Mobile Apps and SMS Messaging as Physical and Mental Health Interventions: Systematic Review.使用移动应用程序和短信作为身心健康干预措施:系统评价。
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Aug 24;19(8):e295. doi: 10.2196/jmir.7740.
5
Mobile Apps for Bipolar Disorder: A Systematic Review of Features and Content Quality.用于双相情感障碍的移动应用程序:功能与内容质量的系统评价
J Med Internet Res. 2015 Aug 17;17(8):e198. doi: 10.2196/jmir.4581.
6
The Potential of mHealth Applications in Improving Resistant Hypertension Self-Assessment, Treatment and Control.移动医疗应用在改善耐药性高血压自我评估、治疗和控制方面的潜力。
Curr Hypertens Rep. 2019 Oct 9;21(10):81. doi: 10.1007/s11906-019-0986-z.
7
Security Concerns in Android mHealth Apps.安卓移动医疗应用中的安全问题。
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2014 Nov 14;2014:645-54. eCollection 2014.
8
Mobile health and privacy: cross sectional study.移动健康与隐私:横断面研究
BMJ. 2021 Jun 16;373:n1248. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n1248.
9
[Apps in healthcare, what do I need to know?].[医疗保健中的应用程序,我需要了解什么?]
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2020 Nov 5;164:D4956.
10
Many Mobile Health Apps Target High-Need, High-Cost Populations, But Gaps Remain.许多移动健康应用针对高需求、高成本人群,但差距仍然存在。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2016 Dec 1;35(12):2310-2318. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2016.0578.

引用本文的文献

1
Pragmatic Approach to the Assessment and Use of Digital Mental Health Interventions for Health Workers.实用主义方法评估和使用数字心理健康干预措施对卫生工作者。
Am J Public Health. 2024 Feb;114(S2):171-179. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2023.307505.
2
Multi-stakeholder perspectives regarding preferred modalities for mental health intervention delivered in the orthopedic clinic: a qualitative analysis.多利益相关者对骨科诊所提供的心理健康干预首选模式的看法:定性分析。
BMC Psychiatry. 2023 May 19;23(1):347. doi: 10.1186/s12888-023-04868-9.
3
Multi-stakeholder perspectives regarding preferred modalities for mental health intervention delivered in the orthopedic clinic: A qualitative analysis.

本文引用的文献

1
Smartphone Apps for Schizophrenia: A Systematic Review.智能手机应用程序治疗精神分裂症:系统评价。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2015 Nov 6;3(4):e102. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.4930.
2
Mobile Phone Ownership and Endorsement of "mHealth" Among People With Psychosis: A Meta-analysis of Cross-sectional Studies.精神病患者的手机拥有情况及对“移动健康”的认可:横断面研究的荟萃分析
Schizophr Bull. 2016 Mar;42(2):448-55. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbv132. Epub 2015 Sep 22.
3
Mobile Phone Sensor Correlates of Depressive Symptom Severity in Daily-Life Behavior: An Exploratory Study.
关于骨科诊所心理健康干预首选方式的多利益相关方观点:一项定性分析。
Res Sq. 2023 Jan 30:rs.3.rs-2327095. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-2327095/v1.
4
Digital phenotyping in depression diagnostics: Integrating psychiatric and engineering perspectives.抑郁症诊断中的数字表型分析:整合精神病学与工程学视角
World J Psychiatry. 2022 Mar 19;12(3):393-409. doi: 10.5498/wjp.v12.i3.393.
5
Breaking the Data Value-Privacy Paradox in Mobile Mental Health Systems Through User-Centered Privacy Protection: A Web-Based Survey Study.通过以用户为中心的隐私保护打破移动心理健康系统中的数据价值-隐私悖论:一项基于网络的调查研究。
JMIR Ment Health. 2021 Dec 24;8(12):e31633. doi: 10.2196/31633.
6
Digital Technologies for Schizophrenia Management: A Descriptive Review.数字技术在精神分裂症管理中的应用:描述性综述。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2021 Apr 9;27(2):25. doi: 10.1007/s11948-021-00302-z.
7
Framework for the Design Engineering and Clinical Implementation and Evaluation of mHealth Apps for Sleep Disturbance: Systematic Review.用于睡眠障碍的移动医疗应用程序的设计工程和临床实施及评估的框架:系统评价。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Feb 17;23(2):e24607. doi: 10.2196/24607.
8
Sensor, Wearable, and Remote Patient Monitoring Competencies for Clinical Care and Training: Scoping Review.用于临床护理和培训的传感器、可穿戴设备及远程患者监测能力:范围综述
J Technol Behav Sci. 2021;6(2):252-277. doi: 10.1007/s41347-020-00190-3. Epub 2021 Jan 22.
9
Digital Phenotyping and Digital Psychotropic Drugs: Mental Health Surveillance Tools That Threaten Human Rights.数字表型分析与数字精神药物:威胁人权的心理健康监测工具
Health Hum Rights. 2020 Dec;22(2):33-39.
10
Stay Present with Your Phone: A Systematic Review and Standardized Rating of Mindfulness Apps in European App Stores.关注手机中的正念应用:欧洲应用商店中正念应用的系统评价与标准化评级
Int J Behav Med. 2021 Oct;28(5):552-560. doi: 10.1007/s12529-020-09944-y. Epub 2020 Nov 20.
日常生活行为中手机传感器与抑郁症状严重程度的相关性:一项探索性研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2015 Jul 15;17(7):e175. doi: 10.2196/jmir.4273.
4
A regulatory framework emerges for digital medicine.数字医学的监管框架应运而生。
Nat Biotechnol. 2015 Jul;33(7):697-702. doi: 10.1038/nbt.3284.
5
Smartphone-Supported versus Full Behavioural Activation for Depression: A Randomised Controlled Trial.智能手机支持的与完全行为激活治疗抑郁症:一项随机对照试验。
PLoS One. 2015 May 26;10(5):e0126559. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0126559. eCollection 2015.
6
Mobile health apps in Sweden: what do physicians recommend?瑞典的移动健康应用程序:医生有何推荐?
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2015;210:793-7.
7
Privacy in the digital world: medical and health data outside of HIPAA protections.数字世界中的隐私:不受《健康保险流通与责任法案》保护的医疗和健康数据。
Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2014 Nov;16(11):494. doi: 10.1007/s11920-014-0494-4.
8
Smartphone ownership and interest in mobile applications to monitor symptoms of mental health conditions.智能手机拥有率以及使用移动应用程序监测心理健康状况的意愿。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2014 Jan 21;2(1):e2. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.2994.
9
Promise and perils of digital psychiatry.数字精神病学的前景与风险。
Asian J Psychiatr. 2014 Aug;10:120-2. doi: 10.1016/j.ajp.2014.06.006. Epub 2014 Jun 12.
10
Cognitive behavior therapy versus interpersonal psychotherapy for social anxiety disorder delivered via smartphone and computer: a randomized controlled trial.智能手机和计算机介导的认知行为疗法与人际心理治疗治疗社交焦虑障碍的随机对照试验。
J Anxiety Disord. 2014 May;28(4):410-7. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2014.02.003. Epub 2014 Mar 25.