Suppr超能文献

双pH值联合多通道腔内阻抗测试在主观喉咽反流症状评估中的应用

Dual pH with Multichannel Intraluminal Impedance Testing in the Evaluation of Subjective Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Symptoms.

作者信息

Cumpston Evan C, Blumin Joel H, Bock Jonathan M

机构信息

Division of Laryngology and Professional Voice, Department of Otolaryngology and Communication Sciences, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA.

Division of Laryngology and Professional Voice, Department of Otolaryngology and Communication Sciences, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA

出版信息

Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2016 Dec;155(6):1014-1020. doi: 10.1177/0194599816665819. Epub 2016 Aug 23.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Minimal data exist to define the use of contemporary dual pH with multichannel intraluminal impedance (MII) probes integrating both pharyngeal acid and impedance sensors to evaluate laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) symptoms in a laryngology clinic population. This study was performed to review a series of patients tested with dual pH-MII for suspected LPR symptoms and to analyze pH-MII data findings for this patient cohort.

STUDY DESIGN

Case series with planned data collection.

SETTING

Tertiary laryngology clinic.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

Patients with symptoms suggestive of possible LPR (dysphonia, chronic cough, globus sensation, subglottic stenosis,) were evaluated with a dual pH-MII system, as well as previously validated reflux finding score (RFS) and reflux symptom index (RSI) instruments.

RESULTS

A total of 109 patients were evaluated with dual pH-MII studies between 2010 and 2015, with 51 (47%) studies interpreted as "positive" for evidence of significant LPR, 43 (39%) as "negative," and 15 (14%) as "equivocal." Dual pH-MII data analysis showed that positive studies had an average of 2.84 pharyngeal acid exposures below pH 4 (vs 0.28 for negative) and 46 episodes of proximal reflux exposure (either acid or nonacid) by impedance detection (vs 30.6 for negative). RSI scores were significantly different between positive and negative studies, while RFS scores were not.

CONCLUSIONS

Dual pH-MII analysis is a useful supplementary tool to provide objective evidence of pharyngeal reflux exposure in patients with suspected LPR. RSI scores appear to correlate with objective evidence of acid exposure in the pharynx, while RFS scores do not.

摘要

目的

目前关于在喉科门诊人群中使用整合咽酸和阻抗传感器的当代双pH值与多通道腔内阻抗(MII)探头来评估喉咽反流(LPR)症状的数据极少。本研究旨在回顾一系列因疑似LPR症状而接受双pH-MII检测的患者,并分析该患者队列的pH-MII数据结果。

研究设计

有计划数据收集的病例系列研究。

研究地点

三级喉科门诊。

研究对象与方法

对有疑似LPR症状(发音障碍、慢性咳嗽、咽部异物感、声门下狭窄等)的患者采用双pH-MII系统进行评估,同时使用先前验证过的反流发现评分(RFS)和反流症状指数(RSI)工具。

结果

2010年至2015年间,共有109例患者接受了双pH-MII研究,其中51例(47%)的研究结果被解释为LPR显著的“阳性”证据,43例(39%)为“阴性”,15例(14%)为“不确定”。双pH-MII数据分析显示,阳性研究中平均有2.84次咽酸暴露低于pH 4(阴性为0.28次),通过阻抗检测有46次近端反流暴露(酸或非酸)(阴性为30.6次)。阳性和阴性研究之间的RSI评分有显著差异,而RFS评分无显著差异。

结论

双pH-MII分析是一种有用的辅助工具,可为疑似LPR患者的咽反流暴露提供客观证据。RSI评分似乎与咽部酸暴露的客观证据相关,而RFS评分则不然。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验