University of Rochester.
Child Dev. 2017 Mar;88(2):597-611. doi: 10.1111/cdev.12605. Epub 2016 Aug 25.
Associations among hypothetical, prototypic moral, and conventional judgments; theory of mind (ToM); empathy; and personal distress were examined in 108 socioeconomically diverse preschoolers (M = 42.94 months, SD = 1.42). Repeated measures analysis of covariance with empathy, false beliefs, and their interaction as covariates indicated that empathy was significantly associated with judgments of greater moral but not conventional transgression severity, particularly for psychological harm, and with deserved punishment for unfairness. False beliefs were associated with (combined) moral criterion judgments of rule and authority independence and inalterability. Empathy also was positively associated with criterion judgments but only for children low in ToM. Personal distress was unrelated to judgments. Results demonstrate the importance of both affective and cognitive processes in preschoolers' moral judgments.
在 108 名社会经济背景各异的学龄前儿童(M=42.94 个月,SD=1.42)中,考察了假设的、原型的道德和常规判断之间的关系;心理理论(ToM);同理心;和个人痛苦。在控制同理心、错误信念及其相互作用的重复测量协方差分析中,同理心与更大的道德但不是常规的侵犯严重程度显著相关,特别是对心理伤害,以及对不公平的应受惩罚。错误信念与(综合)道德标准判断规则和权威独立性以及不可改变性有关。同理心也与标准判断呈正相关,但仅适用于心理理论水平较低的儿童。个人痛苦与判断无关。结果表明,情感和认知过程在学龄前儿童的道德判断中都很重要。