Vila Alejandro, Whitaker Christopher M, O'Brien John
Richard S. Ruiz M.D. Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas, 77030.
University of Texas Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences at Houston, Houston, Texas, 77030.
J Comp Neurol. 2017 Mar 1;525(4):850-867. doi: 10.1002/cne.24101. Epub 2016 Sep 21.
Synaptic processes and plasticity of synapses are mediated by large suites of proteins. In most cases, many of these proteins are tethered together by synaptic scaffold proteins. Scaffold proteins have a large number and typically a variety of protein interaction domains that allow many different proteins to be assembled into functional complexes. Because each scaffold protein has a different set of protein interaction domains and a unique set of interacting partners, the presence of synaptic scaffolds can provide insight into the molecular mechanisms that regulate synaptic processes. In studies of rabbit retina, we found SAP102 and Chapsyn110 selectively localized in the tips of B-type horizontal cell processes, where they contact cone and rod photoreceptors. We further identified some known SAP102 binding partners, kainate receptor GluR6/7 and inward rectifier potassium channel Kir2.1, closely associated with SAP102 in photoreceptor invaginations. The kainate receptor occupies a position distinct from that of the majority of AMPA receptors that dominate the horizontal cell postsynaptic response. GluR6/7 and Kir2.1 presumably are involved in synaptic processes that govern cell-to-cell communication and could both contribute in different ways to synaptic currents that mediate feedback signaling. Notably, we failed to find evidence for the presence of Cx57 or Cx59 that might be involved in ephaptic feedback signaling in this complex. The presence of SAP102 and its binding partners in both cone and rod invaginating synapses suggests that whatever mechanism is supported by this protein complex is present in both types of photoreceptors. J. Comp. Neurol. 525:850-867, 2017. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
突触过程和突触可塑性由大量蛋白质介导。在大多数情况下,这些蛋白质中的许多通过突触支架蛋白拴在一起。支架蛋白有大量且通常是多种蛋白质相互作用结构域,这使得许多不同的蛋白质能够组装成功能复合物。由于每个支架蛋白都有不同的蛋白质相互作用结构域集和独特的相互作用伙伴集,突触支架的存在可以为调节突触过程的分子机制提供见解。在对兔视网膜的研究中,我们发现SAP102和Chapsyn110选择性地定位于B型水平细胞突起的末端,在那里它们与视锥和视杆光感受器接触。我们进一步鉴定了一些已知的SAP102结合伙伴,即海人酸受体GluR6/7和内向整流钾通道Kir2.1,它们在光感受器内陷处与SAP102紧密相关。海人酸受体占据的位置与主导水平细胞突触后反应的大多数AMPA受体不同。GluR6/7和Kir2.1可能参与了控制细胞间通讯的突触过程,并且都可能以不同方式对介导反馈信号的突触电流做出贡献。值得注意的是,我们没有找到可能参与该复合体中电突触反馈信号传导的Cx57或Cx59存在的证据。SAP102及其结合伙伴在视锥和视杆内陷突触中的存在表明,该蛋白质复合体所支持的任何机制在两种类型的光感受器中都存在。《比较神经学杂志》525:850 - 867,2017年。© 2016威利期刊公司