Silvestrin Terry M, Steenrod Anna W, Coyne Karin S, Gross David E, Esinduy Canan B, Kodsi Angela B, Slifka Gayle J, Abraham Lucy, Araiza Anna L, Bushmakin Andrew G, Luo Xuemei
MultiCare Tacoma Women's Specialists, Tacoma, WA, USA.
Evidera, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Womens Health (Lond). 2016 Sep;12(5):456-464. doi: 10.1177/1745505716664742. Epub 2016 Aug 24.
The objectives of this study are to describe the implementation process of the Women's Health Assessment Tool/Clinical Decision Support toolkit and summarize patients' and clinicians' perceptions of the toolkit. The Women's Health Assessment Tool/Clinical Decision Support toolkit was piloted at three clinical sites over a 4-month period in Washington State to evaluate health outcomes among mid-life women. The implementation involved a multistep process and engagement of multiple stakeholders over 18 months. Two-thirds of patients (n = 76/110) and clinicians (n = 8/12) participating in pilot completed feedback surveys; five clinicians participated in qualitative interviews. Most patients felt more prepared for their annual visit (69.7%) and that quality of care improved (68.4%) while clinicians reported streamlined patient visits and improved communication with patients. The Women's Health Assessment Tool/Clinical Decision Support toolkit offers a unique approach to introduce and address some of the key health issues that affect mid-life women.
本研究的目的是描述女性健康评估工具/临床决策支持工具包的实施过程,并总结患者和临床医生对该工具包的看法。女性健康评估工具/临床决策支持工具包在华盛顿州的三个临床地点进行了为期4个月的试点,以评估中年女性的健康状况。实施过程涉及一个多步骤流程,并在18个月内让多个利益相关者参与其中。参与试点的三分之二患者(n = 76/110)和临床医生(n = 8/12)完成了反馈调查;五名临床医生参与了定性访谈。大多数患者感觉为年度就诊做了更充分的准备(69.7%),并且护理质量有所提高(68.4%),而临床医生报告称患者就诊流程更加顺畅,与患者的沟通也有所改善。女性健康评估工具/临床决策支持工具包提供了一种独特的方法,来引入和解决一些影响中年女性的关键健康问题。