Department of Behavioral, Social and Health Education Sciences, Emory University, 1518 Clifton Road NE, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA.
Department of Health Behavior, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
Int J Equity Health. 2020 Jul 6;19(1):115. doi: 10.1186/s12939-020-01230-3.
Ending the HIV epidemic requires that women living with HIV (WLWH) have access to structurally competent HIV-related and other health care. WLWH may not regularly engage in care due to inadequate quality; however, women's perspectives on the quality of care they receive are understudied.
We conducted 12 focus groups and three in-depth interviews with Black (90%) and Latina (11%) WLWH enrolled in the Women's Interagency HIV Study in Atlanta, GA, Birmingham, AL, Brooklyn, NY, Chapel Hill, NC, Chicago, IL, and Jackson, MS from November 2017 to May 2018 (n = 92). We used a semi-structured format to facilitate discussions about satisfaction and dissatisfaction with health care engagement experiences, and suggestions for improvement, which were audio-recorded, transcribed, and coded using thematic analysis.
Themes emerged related to women's health care satisfaction or dissatisfaction at the provider, clinic, and systems levels and across Institute of Medicine-defined quality of care domains (effectiveness, efficiency, equity, patient-centeredness, safety and timeliness). Women's degree of care satisfaction was driven by: 1) knowledge-based care resulting in desired outcomes (effectiveness); 2) coordination, continuity and necessity of care (efficiency); 3) perceived disparities in care (equity); 4) care delivery characterized by compassion, nonjudgment, accommodation, and autonomous decision-making (patient-centeredness); 5) attention to avoiding side effects and over-medicalization (safety); and 6) limited wait time (timeliness).
Quality of care represents a key changeable lever affecting engage in care among WLWH. The communities most proximally affected by HIV should be key stakeholders in HIV-related quality assurance. Findings highlight aspects of the health care experience valued by WLWH, and potential participatory, patient-driven avenues for improvement.
终结艾滋病疫情需要艾滋病毒感染者(PLHIV)获得结构上有能力提供的与艾滋病相关的和其他健康护理。PLHIV 可能由于护理质量不高而无法定期接受护理;然而,对她们所接受的护理质量的看法还研究不足。
我们于 2017 年 11 月至 2018 年 5 月在亚特兰大、伯明翰、布鲁克林、教堂山、芝加哥和杰克逊等地的妇女机构间艾滋病毒研究中,对 92 名参与研究的黑人和拉丁裔(11%)PLHIV 进行了 12 次焦点小组和 3 次深入访谈(黑人占 90%,拉丁裔占 11%)。我们采用半结构式的方式促进讨论,内容涉及对参与卫生保健的满意度和不满,以及改进建议,讨论过程进行了录音、转录和主题分析。
研究结果呈现了提供者、诊所和系统层面以及跨医学研究所定义的质量关怀领域(有效性、效率、公平性、以患者为中心、安全性和及时性)的卫生保健满意度或不满主题。女性对护理的满意度程度取决于:1)基于知识的护理带来理想的结果(有效性);2)护理的协调性、连续性和必要性(效率);3)感知到的护理差异(公平性);4)以同情心、非评判、适应和自主决策为特征的护理(以患者为中心);5)关注避免副作用和过度医疗化(安全性);6)等待时间有限(及时性)。
护理质量是影响 PLHIV 参与护理的关键可改变因素。受艾滋病毒影响最直接的社区应该是艾滋病毒相关质量保证的主要利益相关者。研究结果突出了 PLHIV 重视的护理体验方面,以及潜在的参与性、以患者为驱动的改进途径。