Venturini Massimo, Sallemi Claudio, Agostini Giulia, Marra Paolo, Cereda Stefano, Reni Michele, Aldrighetti Luca, De Cobelli Francesco, Del Maschio Alessandro
1 Department of di Radiology, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
2 Department of Oncology, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Br J Radiol. 2016 Nov;89(1067):20160247. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20160247. Epub 2016 Sep 16.
The aim of our preliminary study was to compare the efficacy of drug-eluting beads preloaded with irinotecan (DEBIRI) vs drug-eluting beads preloaded with doxorubicin (DEBDOX) as second-line treatment of unresectable liver metastases from cholangiocarcinoma (CCA).
In 2013, 10 patients affected by multiple liver metastases from CCA, resistant to the first-line chemotherapy regimen, were enrolled: 5 patients were submitted to lobar/segmental transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) with DEBIRI (100-mg irinotecan/1 vial) and 5 patients with DEBDOX (50-mg doxorubicin/1 vial), performed every 3 weeks. Patients treated with DEBIRI received antipain premedication consisting of 30-mg of morphine and 3-4 ml of intra-arterial lidocaine. Complications and efficacy were assessed (response evaluation criteria in solid tumour 1.1).
A total of 32 TACE were performed (mean: 3.2 TACE/patient), all well tolerated, with only 1 case of asymptomatic cholecystitis spontaneously recovered. Response rates of patients treated with DEBDOX and DEBIRI were: 4/5 progressive disease and 1/5 partial response vs 2/5 partial response, 2/5 stable disease and 1/5 progressive disease, respectively, with the appearance of variable necrosis percentage. Progression-free survival from the first procedure and progressive disease were 12.67 weeks for DEBIRI and 15.78 weeks for DEBDOX, respectively. Overall survival from time of primary diagnosis was 176 weeks for DEBIRI and 125 weeks for DEBDOX, respectively.
In our preliminary experience, DEBIRI was more effective than DEBDOX as a second-line treatment for hepatic metastases from CCA. Antipain drug administration and the use of the microcatheter led to a good treatment tolerability and a low complication rate. Advances in knowledge: In our preliminary experience, DEBIRI was more effective than DEBDOX as a second-line treatment of hepatic metastases from CCA; further studies involving a larger cohort of patients are needed.
我们初步研究的目的是比较载有伊立替康的药物洗脱微球(DEBIRI)与载有阿霉素的药物洗脱微球(DEBDOX)作为胆管癌(CCA)不可切除肝转移瘤二线治疗的疗效。
2013年,纳入10例受CCA多发性肝转移影响、对一线化疗方案耐药的患者:5例患者接受了用DEBIRI(100mg伊立替康/1瓶)进行的叶/段经动脉化疗栓塞术(TACE),5例患者接受了DEBDOX(50mg阿霉素/1瓶),每3周进行一次。接受DEBIRI治疗的患者接受了由30mg吗啡和3 - 4ml动脉内利多卡因组成的镇痛预处理。评估并发症和疗效(实体瘤疗效评价标准1.1)。
共进行了32次TACE(平均:3.2次TACE/患者),所有患者耐受性良好,仅1例无症状胆囊炎自行恢复。接受DEBDOX和DEBIRI治疗的患者的缓解率分别为:4/5疾病进展和1/5部分缓解,而2/5部分缓解、2/5疾病稳定和1/5疾病进展,坏死百分比各不相同。首次手术的无进展生存期和疾病进展分别为DEBIRI 12.67周和DEBDOX 15.78周。从初次诊断时间起的总生存期分别为DEBIRI 176周和DEBDOX 125周。
根据我们的初步经验,DEBIRI作为CCA肝转移瘤的二线治疗比DEBDOX更有效。镇痛药物给药和微导管的使用导致了良好的治疗耐受性和低并发症发生率。知识进展:根据我们的初步经验,DEBIRI作为CCA肝转移瘤的二线治疗比DEBDOX更有效;需要进一步开展涉及更大患者队列的研究。