Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Department of Economics, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
BJOG. 2017 Oct;124(11):1753-1761. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.14275. Epub 2016 Aug 26.
Our objective was to describe contemporary practice patterns in the timing of caesarean delivery in relation to cervical dilation, overall and by indication for caesarean. Our secondary objective was to examine how commonly caesarean delivery was performed for labour dystocia at dilations below 4 cm or without the use of oxytocin, overall and between hospitals.
Retrospective, population-based cohort study.
Ontario, Alberta, and British Columbia, Canada, 2008-2012.
Nulliparous women in labour who delivered term singletons in cephalic position.
Histograms were used to examine the distribution of cervical dilation at time of caesarean delivery, overall and by indication for caesarean. Funnel plots were used to illustrate variation in hospital-level rates of caesarean deliveries for labour dystocia that were performed early (<4 cm dilation) or without the use of oxytocin.
Cervical dilation (in centimetres) at time of caesarean delivery.
The population-based cohort comprised 392 025 women, of whom 18.8% had a caesarean delivery. Of first-stage caesareans for labour dystocia in women who entered labour spontaneously, 13.6% (95% CI 12.9, 14.2) had dilations <4 cm [hospital-level inter-quartile range (IQR): 6.2% to 20.0%] and 29.5% (95% CI 28.6, 30.4) did not receive oxytocin to treat their dystocia (hospital-level IQR: 22.1-54.6%).
The proportion of caesareans done before 4 cm dilation or without oxytocin varies substantially across hospitals and suggests the need for institutions to review their practices and ensure that management of labour practice guidelines are followed.
Many caesareans for labour dystocia are performed early during labour (<4 cm dilation) or without oxytocin.
本研究旨在描述与宫颈扩张相关的剖宫产时机的当代实践模式,包括整体情况以及不同剖宫产指征的情况。本研究的次要目的是评估在未使用缩宫素且宫颈扩张小于 4cm 的情况下,整体以及不同医院行剖宫产术治疗产程阻滞的情况。
回顾性、基于人群的队列研究。
加拿大安大略省、艾伯塔省和不列颠哥伦比亚省,2008-2012 年。
处于活跃期的初产妇,头位单胎妊娠,且胎儿足月。
使用直方图分析整体以及不同剖宫产指征的剖宫产时宫颈扩张情况。使用漏斗图说明因产程阻滞行早期(<4cm 扩张)或未使用缩宫素的剖宫产术的医院间差异。
剖宫产时的宫颈扩张程度(cm)。
该基于人群的队列纳入了 392025 名妇女,其中 18.8%行剖宫产术。对于自发性临产且因产程阻滞而行第一产程剖宫产的妇女,13.6%(95%CI 12.9,14.2)的宫颈扩张<4cm[医院内四分位间距(IQR):6.2%20.0%],29.5%(95%CI 28.6,30.4)未使用缩宫素治疗其产程阻滞(医院内 IQR:22.1%54.6%)。
许多因产程阻滞而行的剖宫产术是在产程早期(<4cm 扩张)或未使用缩宫素的情况下进行的,这表明各机构需要审查其治疗方案,确保遵循管理产程实践指南。
许多因产程阻滞而行的剖宫产术是在产程早期(<4cm 扩张)或未使用缩宫素的情况下进行的。