• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Screening of gestational carriers in the United States.美国妊娠载体的筛查。
Fertil Steril. 2016 Nov;106(6):1496-1502. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.07.1111. Epub 2016 Aug 23.
2
Consideration of the gestational carrier: a committee opinion.代孕问题的考虑:委员会意见。
Fertil Steril. 2013 Jun;99(7):1838-41. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.02.042. Epub 2013 Mar 29.
3
Assisted reproduction involving gestational surrogacy: an analysis of the medical, psychosocial and legal issues: experience from a large surrogacy program.辅助生殖涉及代孕:对医疗、心理社会和法律问题的分析:大型代孕计划的经验。
Hum Reprod. 2015 Feb;30(2):345-52. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deu333. Epub 2014 Dec 17.
4
Outcomes for Gestational Carriers Versus Traditional Surrogates in the United States.美国妊娠代孕母亲与传统代孕母亲的结局比较。
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2018 May;27(5):640-645. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2017.6540. Epub 2018 Jan 11.
5
Informed consent in medical decision-making in commercial gestational surrogacy: a mixed methods study in New Delhi, India.商业代孕中医疗决策的知情同意:印度新德里的一项混合方法研究
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2015 May;94(5):465-72. doi: 10.1111/aogs.12576. Epub 2015 Feb 4.
6
Gestational surrogacy: medical, psychosocial, and legal considerations.代孕:医学、心理社会和法律方面的考虑。
Fertil Steril. 2020 May;113(5):889-891. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2020.03.016. Epub 2020 Apr 17.
7
Recommendations for practices utilizing gestational carriers: a committee opinion.关于使用妊娠载体的实践建议:委员会意见
Fertil Steril. 2017 Feb;107(2):e3-e10. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.11.007. Epub 2017 Jan 6.
8
Assisted reproductive technology and perinatal outcomes: conventional versus discordant-sibling design.辅助生殖技术与围产结局:传统设计与非同卵双生设计的比较。
Fertil Steril. 2016 Sep 1;106(3):710-716.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.04.038. Epub 2016 May 14.
9
Consideration of the gestational carrier: an Ethics Committee opinion.代孕母亲的考量:伦理委员会意见。
Fertil Steril. 2018 Nov;110(6):1017-1021. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.08.029.
10
Psychological assessment of gestational carrier candidates: current approaches, challenges, and future considerations.代孕候选人的心理评估:当前方法、挑战和未来考虑。
Fertil Steril. 2020 May;113(5):897-902. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2020.02.104. Epub 2020 Apr 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Reduction in multiple pregnancy rate in donor oocyte-recipient gestational carrier (GC) in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles in the USA with single-embryo transfer and preimplantation genetic testing.在美国,通过单胚胎移植和植入前基因检测,供体卵母细胞-受体妊娠载体(GC)体外受精(IVF)周期中多胎妊娠率降低。
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2021 Jun;38(6):1441-1447. doi: 10.1007/s10815-021-02112-5. Epub 2021 Mar 11.
2
Reproductive and sexual Health of surrogate mothers, developing a care program: a protocol for mixed methods study.代孕母亲的生殖和性健康,制定关爱方案:混合方法研究方案。
Reprod Health. 2019 Feb 26;16(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s12978-019-0687-8.
3
Outcomes for Gestational Carriers Versus Traditional Surrogates in the United States.美国妊娠代孕母亲与传统代孕母亲的结局比较。
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2018 May;27(5):640-645. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2017.6540. Epub 2018 Jan 11.
4
"One for Sorrow, Two for Joy?": American embryo transfer guideline recommendations, practices, and outcomes for gestational surrogate patients.“一为悲伤,二为欢乐?”:美国针对妊娠代孕患者的胚胎移植指南建议、实践与结果
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2017 Apr;34(4):431-443. doi: 10.1007/s10815-017-0885-7. Epub 2017 Feb 9.

本文引用的文献

1
Trends and outcomes of gestational surrogacy in the United States.美国代孕的趋势与结果
Fertil Steril. 2016 Aug;106(2):435-442.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.03.050. Epub 2016 Apr 14.
2
ACOG Committee Opinion No. 660: Family Building Through Gestational Surrogacy.美国妇产科医师学会委员会意见 No.660:通过代孕实现家庭生育
Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Mar;127(3):e97-e103. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001352.
3
How Agencies Market Egg Donation on the Internet: A Qualitative Study.机构如何在互联网上营销卵子捐赠:一项定性研究。
J Law Med Ethics. 2015 Fall;43(3):610-8. doi: 10.1111/jlme.12303.
4
Surrogacy: outcomes for surrogate mothers, children and the resulting families-a systematic review.代孕:代孕母亲、儿童和由此产生的家庭的结果——系统评价。
Hum Reprod Update. 2016 Mar-Apr;22(2):260-76. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmv046. Epub 2015 Oct 9.
5
Results of the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 among gestational surrogacy candidates.妊娠代孕候选者的明尼苏达多相人格问卷-2结果。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2015 Sep;130(3):257-60. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2015.03.030. Epub 2015 May 9.
6
Recommendations for practices utilizing gestational carriers: a committee opinion.关于使用妊娠载体的实践建议:委员会意见
Fertil Steril. 2015 Jan;103(1):e1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.10.049. Epub 2014 Dec 4.
7
Consideration of the gestational carrier: a committee opinion.代孕问题的考虑:委员会意见。
Fertil Steril. 2013 Jun;99(7):1838-41. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.02.042. Epub 2013 Mar 29.
8
Compliance with donor age recommendations in oocyte donor recruitment advertisements in the USA.遵守美国卵母细胞捐赠者招募广告中的捐赠者年龄建议。
Reprod Biomed Online. 2013 Apr;26(4):400-5. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2012.11.011. Epub 2012 Dec 1.
9
Recruiting egg donors online: an analysis of in vitro fertilization clinic and agency websites' adherence to American Society for Reproductive Medicine guidelines.招募卵子捐赠者的在线途径:对体外受精诊所和机构网站遵守美国生殖医学学会指南的分析。
Fertil Steril. 2012 Oct;98(4):995-1000. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.06.052. Epub 2012 Jul 27.
10
Recommendations for practices utilizing gestational carriers: an ASRM Practice Committee guideline.利用妊娠代孕者的建议:ASRM 实践委员会指南。
Fertil Steril. 2012 Jun;97(6):1301-8. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.03.011. Epub 2012 Apr 12.

美国妊娠载体的筛查。

Screening of gestational carriers in the United States.

作者信息

Fuchs Erika L, Berenson Abbey B

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Center for Interdisciplinary Research in Women's Health, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas.

Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Center for Interdisciplinary Research in Women's Health, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas.

出版信息

Fertil Steril. 2016 Nov;106(6):1496-1502. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.07.1111. Epub 2016 Aug 23.

DOI:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.07.1111
PMID:27565254
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5159232/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess medical and psychosocial screening and evaluation received by gestational carriers and compare those using agencies to those not using agencies.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional questionnaire.

SETTING

Not applicable.

PATIENT(S): A total of 204 women who completed a survey on their experiences as gestational carriers in the United States.

INTERVENTION(S): None.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Self-reported screening received before gestational carrier pregnancies.

RESULT(S): Overall, 97.1% of gestational carriers had a complete medical evaluation and 94.6% had an evaluation or counseling by a mental health professional. Most participants indicated that they had been informed of at least some medical risks (92.6%) and psychological considerations (89.7%). Participants most often recalled being informed of the risks of multiple pregnancy (89.2%) and medical procedures and medications (87.2%), but least often recalled being informed about the risks of impact on their own employment (46.6%) and to their own children (61.3%). There were no differences in outcome measures between those using an agency and those who did not.

CONCLUSION(S): Self-reported screening and evaluation was high, but still not 100% on all measures. Further education of providers regarding guidelines for the screening and evaluation of gestational carriers may be needed.

摘要

目的

评估妊娠载体接受的医学和社会心理筛查与评估,并比较使用中介机构的妊娠载体和未使用中介机构的妊娠载体。

设计

横断面问卷调查。

地点

不适用。

患者

共有204名女性完成了一项关于她们在美国作为妊娠载体经历的调查。

干预措施

无。

主要观察指标

妊娠载体怀孕前自我报告的筛查情况。

结果

总体而言,97.1%的妊娠载体接受了全面的医学评估,94.6%接受了心理健康专业人员的评估或咨询。大多数参与者表示,他们至少被告知一些医学风险(92.6%)和心理因素(89.7%)。参与者最常回忆起被告知多胎妊娠风险(89.2%)以及医疗程序和药物风险(87.2%),但最不常回忆起被告知对自身就业(46.6%)和对自己孩子(61.3%)的影响风险。使用中介机构的妊娠载体和未使用中介机构的妊娠载体在观察指标上没有差异。

结论

自我报告的筛查和评估比例较高,但并非所有指标都达到100%。可能需要对医疗服务提供者进行关于妊娠载体筛查和评估指南的进一步教育。