Makhijani Reeva, Coulter Madeline, Taggar Arti, Godiwala Prachi, O'Sullivan David, Nulsen John, Engmann Lawrence, Benadiva Claudio, Grow Daniel
Center for Advanced Reproductive Services, Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, University of Connecticut School of Medicine, 2 Batterson Park Road, Farmington, CT, 06032, USA.
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2021 Jun;38(6):1441-1447. doi: 10.1007/s10815-021-02112-5. Epub 2021 Mar 11.
To evaluate the utilization of single-embryo transfer (SET) and preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) in gestational carrier IVF cycles in the USA with donor oocyte and examine the impact on live birth and multiple gestation.
Retrospective cohort study using the Society of Assisted Reproductive Technology (SART) clinic database of 4776 donor oocyte-recipient IVF cycles in which a GC was used. The cycles were separated into 4 groups by use of PGT and number of embryos transferred as follows: (1) PGT and single-embryo transfer (PGT-SET); (2) PGT and multiple embryo transfer (PGT-MET); (3) no PGT and SET (NoPGT-SET); (4) no PGT and MET (NoPGT-MET). Primary outcomes were live birth rate (LBR) and multiple pregnancy rate (MPR).
More than one blastocyst was transferred in 48.7% (2323/4774) of the cycles. When ≥1 blastocyst was transferred, with or without the use of PGT, the MPR was 45.5% and 42.0%, respectively. In comparison, in the PGT-SET and NoPGT-SET groups, the MPR was 1.4% (8/579) and 3.3% (29/883), respectively. Live birth rates increased with the use of PGT-A and with MET.
This study shows that SET, with or without PGT, is associated with a significantly reduced MPR in donor oocyte-recipient GC IVF cycles while maintaining high LBR. It also demonstrates that many infertility centers in the USA are not adhering to ASRM embryo transfer guidelines. Our findings highlight an opportunity to increase GC safety, which ultimately may lead to widened access to this increasingly restricted service outside the USA.
评估美国使用供体卵母细胞的妊娠载体体外受精周期中单胚胎移植(SET)和植入前基因检测(PGT)的应用情况,并研究其对活产和多胎妊娠的影响。
采用回顾性队列研究,使用辅助生殖技术协会(SART)诊所数据库中4776例使用妊娠载体的供体卵母细胞-受体体外受精周期。根据是否使用PGT和移植胚胎数量将周期分为4组:(1)PGT和单胚胎移植(PGT-SET);(2)PGT和多胚胎移植(PGT-MET);(3)未使用PGT和单胚胎移植(NoPGT-SET);(4)未使用PGT和多胚胎移植(NoPGT-MET)。主要结局指标为活产率(LBR)和多胎妊娠率(MPR)。
48.7%(2323/4774)的周期移植了不止一个囊胚。当移植≥1个囊胚时,无论是否使用PGT,MPR分别为45.5%和42.0%。相比之下,在PGT-SET组和NoPGT-SET组中,MPR分别为1.4%(8/579)和3.3%(29/883)。活产率随着PGT-A的使用和多胚胎移植而增加。
本研究表明,无论是否使用PGT,SET在供体卵母细胞-受体妊娠载体体外受精周期中均与显著降低的MPR相关,同时保持较高的LBR。研究还表明,美国许多不孕不育中心未遵循美国生殖医学学会(ASRM)的胚胎移植指南。我们的研究结果凸显了提高妊娠载体安全性的机会,这最终可能会使美国以外地区越来越受限的这项服务的可及性得到扩大。