Suppr超能文献

生物类似药与原研非格司亭在异基因造血干细胞移植中的移植结局及经济成本比较。

Comparison of transplant outcomes and economic costs between biosimilar and originator filgrastim in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

作者信息

Harada Kaito, Yamada Yuta, Konishi Tatsuya, Nagata Akihito, Takezaki Toshiaki, Kaito Satoshi, Kurosawa Shuhei, Sakaguchi Masahiro, Yasuda Shunichiro, Yoshioka Kosuke, Watakabe-Inamoto Kyoko, Igarashi Aiko, Najima Yuho, Hagino Takeshi, Muto Hideharu, Kobayashi Takeshi, Doki Noriko, Kakihana Kazuhiko, Sakamaki Hisashi, Ohashi Kazuteru

机构信息

Hematology Division, Tokyo Metropolitan Cancer and Infectious Disease Center, Komagome Hospital, 3-18-22 Honkomagome, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8677, Japan.

出版信息

Int J Hematol. 2016 Dec;104(6):709-719. doi: 10.1007/s12185-016-2085-0. Epub 2016 Aug 26.

Abstract

From January 2012 to September 2015, 49 patients received biosimilar filgrastim (BF) after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation (BMT, n = 31) or peripheral stem cell transplantation (PBSCT, n = 18) in our institution. To evaluate the clinical impact of BF on transplant outcomes of these patients, we compared hematological recovery, overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), transplantation-related mortality (TRM), cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR), and acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) with those of control patients who received originator filgrastim (OF) after BMT (n = 31) or PBSCT (n = 18). All cases were randomly selected from a clinical database in our institution. In both the BMT and PBSCT settings, neutrophil recovery (17 vs. 19 days in BMT; 13 vs. 15 days in PBSCT) and platelet recovery (27 vs. 31 days in BMT; 17 vs. 28 days in PBSCT) were essentially the same between BF and OF. They were also comparable in terms of OS, DFS, TRM, CIR, and the incidence of acute GVHD and chronic GVHD. On multivariate analysis, the use of BF in both BMT and PBSCT was not a significant factor for adverse transplant outcomes. Although BF significantly reduced filgrastim costs in both BMT and PBSCT, total hospitalization costs were not significantly different between BF and OF.

摘要

2012年1月至2015年9月期间,我院49例患者在接受异基因骨髓移植(BMT,n = 31)或外周干细胞移植(PBSCT,n = 18)后接受了生物类似物非格司亭(BF)治疗。为评估BF对这些患者移植结局的临床影响,我们将血液学恢复情况、总生存期(OS)、无病生存期(DFS)、移植相关死亡率(TRM)、复发累积发生率(CIR)以及急慢性移植物抗宿主病(GVHD)与在BMT(n = 31)或PBSCT(n = 18)后接受原研非格司亭(OF)的对照患者进行了比较。所有病例均从我院临床数据库中随机选取。在BMT和PBSCT两种情况下,BF组和OF组的中性粒细胞恢复时间(BMT中分别为17天和19天;PBSCT中分别为13天和15天)以及血小板恢复时间(BMT中分别为27天和31天;PBSCT中分别为17天和28天)基本相同。在OS、DFS、TRM、CIR以及急性GVHD和慢性GVHD的发生率方面,两组也具有可比性。多因素分析显示,在BMT和PBSCT中使用BF并非移植不良结局的显著因素。尽管BF在BMT和PBSCT中均显著降低了非格司亭成本,但BF组和OF组的总住院费用并无显著差异。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验