Department of Geography, University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam Road, Hong Kong, China.
Sci Total Environ. 2016 Dec 15;573:222-232. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.08.102. Epub 2016 Aug 23.
Green roof, an increasingly common constituent of urban green infrastructure, can provide multiple ecosystem services and mitigate climate-change and urban-heat-island challenges. Its adoption has been beset by a longstanding preconception of attracting urban pests like mosquitoes. As more cities may become vulnerable to emerging and re-emerging mosquito-borne infectious diseases, the knowledge gap needs to be filled. This study gauges the habitat preference of vector mosquitoes for extensive green roofs vis-à-vis positive and negative control sites in an urban setting. Seven sites in a university campus were selected to represent three experimental treatments: green roofs (GR), ground-level blue-green spaces as positive controls (PC), and bare roofs as negative controls (NC). Mosquito-trapping devices were deployed for a year from March 2015 to 2016. Human-biting mosquito species known to transmit infectious diseases in the region were identified and recorded as target species. Generalized linear models evaluated the effects of site type, season, and weather on vector-mosquito abundance. Our model revealed site type as a significant predictor of vector mosquito abundance, with considerably more vector mosquitoes captured in PC than in GR and NC. Vector abundance was higher in NC than in GR, attributed to the occasional presence of water pools in depressions of roofing membrane after rainfall. Our data also demonstrated seasonal differences in abundance. Weather variables were evaluated to assess human-vector contact risks under different weather conditions. Culex quinquefasciatus, a competent vector of diseases including lymphatic filariasis and West Nile fever, could be the most adaptable species. Our analysis demonstrates that green roofs are not particularly preferred by local vector mosquitoes compared to bare roofs and other urban spaces in a humid subtropical setting. The findings call for a better understanding of vector ecology in diverse urban landscapes to improve disease control efficacy amidst surging urbanization and changing climate.
绿色屋顶作为城市绿色基础设施的一个重要组成部分,能够提供多种生态系统服务,并缓解气候变化和城市热岛效应等问题。然而,由于长期以来人们普遍认为绿色屋顶会吸引蚊子等城市害虫,这一技术的应用一直受到阻碍。随着越来越多的城市可能更容易受到新发和再发的蚊媒传染病的影响,填补这一知识空白显得尤为重要。本研究评估了在城市环境中,病媒蚊子对广泛应用的绿色屋顶的栖息地偏好,同时也对阳性对照(地面蓝绿空间)和阴性对照(裸露屋顶)场地进行了评估。研究选择了大学校园中的七个地点,代表三种实验处理:绿色屋顶(GR)、地面蓝绿空间作为阳性对照(PC)和裸露屋顶作为阴性对照(NC)。从 2015 年 3 月到 2016 年,使用诱蚊器进行了为期一年的蚊虫捕获。对已知在该地区传播传染病的人类叮咬蚊种进行了识别和记录作为目标物种。广义线性模型评估了地点类型、季节和天气对病媒蚊丰度的影响。我们的模型表明,地点类型是病媒蚊丰度的一个重要预测因子,阳性对照(PC)中捕获的病媒蚊数量明显多于绿色屋顶(GR)和阴性对照(NC)。NC 中的病媒蚊数量高于 GR,这归因于降雨后屋顶膜凹陷处偶尔会出现水坑。我们的数据还表明,丰度存在季节性差异。评估了天气变量,以评估在不同天气条件下人类与病媒的接触风险。库蚊是包括象皮病和西尼罗河热在内的多种疾病的主要传播媒介,可能是适应性最强的物种。我们的分析表明,与裸露屋顶和其他城市空间相比,在潮湿的亚热带环境中,绿色屋顶对当地病媒蚊子的吸引力并不大。这些发现呼吁人们更好地了解不同城市景观中的病媒生态学,以在城市化和气候变化的背景下提高疾病控制效果。