Suppr超能文献

比较超声引导下与盲目注射类固醇于肩周炎患者盂肱关节中的准确性和疗效。

Comparing the accuracy and efficacy of ultrasound-guided versus blind injections of steroid in the glenohumeral joint in patients with shoulder adhesive capsulitis.

作者信息

Raeissadat Seyed Ahmad, Rayegani Seyed Mansoor, Langroudi Taraneh Faghihi, Khoiniha Maryam

机构信息

Clinical Research Development Center of Shahid Modarres Hospital, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Saadat Abad, Tehran, 1998734383, Iran.

Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Shohadaye Tajrish Hospital, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Saadat Abad, Tehran, 1989934148, Iran.

出版信息

Clin Rheumatol. 2017 Apr;36(4):933-940. doi: 10.1007/s10067-016-3393-8. Epub 2016 Aug 26.

Abstract

Shoulder adhesive capsulitis is a condition mainly characterized by a decreased range of motion (ROM), with a lifelong prevalence of 2-5 %. Intra-articular steroid injection is an important treatment in this disease. It has been suggested that ultrasound-guided (US-guided) intra-articular injections are more accurate and effective than blind injections. This randomized clinical trial was designed to compare efficacy and accuracy of US-guided injections versus blind injections of steroid in the glenohumeral joint. Forty-one patients diagnosed with shoulder adhesive capsulitis were included. Patients randomly underwent intra-articular injection either blind or under guidance of ultrasound by a specialist. Immediately after injection, radiograms were obtained to assess the accuracy of injection. Demographic characteristics, their functional status, the severity of pain, and the ROM were gathered and compared between the two groups. Twenty patients in the US-guided group and 21 in the blind group finished the 4-week period of the study. Improvements in pain, ROM, and functional score after 1 and 4 weeks were more prominent in the US-guided group, but the differences were not statistically significant, except for the changes in extension where the improvements were significantly higher in the US-guided group (p = 0.01). The accuracy of injections was also higher in the US-guided group (90 % vs. 76.19 %), but the differences were not found to be significant (p = 0.24). US-guided injections can be more accurate and yield better improvements in pain, ROM, and function of the patients, but they cost more and are time-consuming.

摘要

肩周炎是一种主要以活动范围(ROM)减小为特征的病症,终生患病率为2%-5%。关节内注射类固醇是这种疾病的一种重要治疗方法。有人提出,超声引导(US引导)下的关节内注射比盲目注射更准确、有效。这项随机临床试验旨在比较US引导注射与盲目注射类固醇药物至盂肱关节的疗效和准确性。纳入了41名被诊断为肩周炎的患者。患者随机接受由专科医生进行的盲目关节内注射或超声引导下的关节内注射。注射后立即获取X线片以评估注射的准确性。收集两组患者的人口统计学特征、功能状态、疼痛严重程度和活动范围,并进行比较。US引导组的20名患者和盲目组的21名患者完成了为期4周的研究。在1周和4周后,US引导组在疼痛、活动范围和功能评分方面的改善更为显著,但差异无统计学意义,除了伸展度的变化,US引导组的改善明显更高(p = 0.01)。US引导组注射的准确性也更高(90%对76.19%),但差异不显著(p = 0.24)。US引导下的注射可能更准确,并且能使患者的疼痛、活动范围和功能得到更好的改善,但成本更高且耗时。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验