Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Ilsan-Paik Hospital, Inje University, and Institute of Sports Rehabilitation, Inje University, Goyang city, Gyonggi-do, South Korea.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2009 Dec;90(12):1997-2002. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2009.07.025.
Lee H-J, Lim K-B, Kim D-Y, Lee K-T. Randomized controlled trial for efficacy of intra-articular injection for adhesive capsulitis: ultrasonography-guided versus blind technique.
To evaluate the clinical effect of ultrasonography (US)-guided intra-articular injections compared with a blind (unguided) technique for the treatment of adhesive capsulitis.
Randomized controlled trial.
Outpatient rehabilitation clinic.
Patients (N=43) diagnosed as having adhesive capsulitis after clinical examinations and radiologic and ultrasonographic study.
Under either US-guided or a blind technique, patients received a 20-mg intra-articular injection of triamcinolone mixed with 1.5mL 2% lidocaine and 4mL normal saline in the first week followed by 5 weekly injections of sodium hyaluronate.
A visual analog scale for pain intensity, range of motion (ROM) of the shoulder (flexion, abduction, external rotation, and internal rotation), and general shoulder function during daily activities at preinjection as a baseline and then every week after injection for 6 weeks for each patient.
Twenty patients out of 22 in the blind injection group and 20 out of 21 in the US-guided group finished the entire 6-week study period. The improvement in pain intensity, ROM, and shoulder function score was significantly greater in the US-guided injection group than in the blind injection group by the second week postinjection (P<.05). However, there were no further significant differences in the improvement between the 2 groups beyond the third week.
US-guided intra-articular injections may offer advantages over a blind technique for the treatment of adhesive capsulitis and may deliver clinical benefits during the first few weeks of treatment. This finding suggests that the improved targeting to the intra-articular space by using US can result in better treatment of adhesive capsulitis.
评估超声(US)引导下关节内注射与盲法(非引导)技术治疗粘连性肩关节囊炎的临床疗效。
随机对照试验。
门诊康复诊所。
经临床检查、影像学和超声检查诊断为粘连性肩关节囊炎的患者(N=43)。
在 US 引导或盲法下,患者在第一周内接受 20mg 曲安奈德关节内注射,混合 1.5mL 2%利多卡因和 4mL 生理盐水,然后每周注射 5 次透明质酸钠。
每位患者在注射前的基线时以及注射后每周进行视觉模拟评分(VAS)以评估疼痛强度、肩部活动度(前屈、外展、外旋和内旋)和日常活动中的一般肩部功能。
盲注组 22 例中有 20 例、US 引导组 21 例中有 20 例完成了整个 6 周研究期。与盲注组相比,US 引导组在注射后第 2 周时疼痛强度、ROM 和肩部功能评分的改善明显更大(P<.05)。然而,在第 3 周后,两组之间的改善没有进一步的显著差异。
US 引导下关节内注射可能优于盲法治疗粘连性肩关节囊炎,并且在治疗的前几周可能会带来临床益处。这一发现表明,使用 US 更精确地靶向关节内空间可以更好地治疗粘连性肩关节囊炎。