Virk Mandeep S, Bruce Benjamin, Hussey Kristen E, Thomas Jacqueline M, Luthringer Tyler A, Shewman Elizabeth F, Wang Vincent M, Verma Nikhil N, Romeo Anthony A, Cole Brian J
Division of Shoulder and Elbow, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, New York University Hospital for Joint Diseases, New York, New York, U.S.A.
Sports and Shoulder and Elbow Division, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Midwest Orthopaedics at Rush University, Chicago, Illinois, U.S.A.
Arthroscopy. 2017 Feb;33(2):242-250. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2016.06.020. Epub 2016 Aug 25.
To compare the biomechanical performance of medial row suture placement relative to the musculotendinous junction (MTJ) in a cadaveric transosseous equivalent suture bridge (TOE-SB) double-row (DR) rotator cuff repair (RCR) model.
A TOE-SB DR technique was used to reattach experimentally created supraspinatus tendon tears in 9 pairs of human cadaveric shoulders. The medial row sutures were passed either near the MTJ (MTJ group) or 10 mm lateral to the MTJ (rotator cuff tendon [RCT] group). After the supraspinatus repair, the specimens underwent cyclic loading and load to failure tests. The localized displacement of the markers affixed to the tendon surface was measured with an optical tracking system.
The MTJ group showed a significantly higher (P = .03) medial row failure (5/9; 3 during cyclic testing and 2 during load to failure testing) compared with the RCT group (0/9). The mean number of cycles completed during cyclic testing was lower in the MTJ group (77) compared with the RCT group (100; P = .07) because 3 specimens failed in the MTJ group during cyclic loading. There were no significant differences between the 2 study groups with respect to biomechanical properties during the load to failure testing.
In a cadaveric TOE-SB DR RCR model, medial row sutures through the MTJ results in a significantly higher rate of medial row failure.
In rotator cuff tears with tendon tissue loss, passage of medial row sutures through the MTJ should be avoided in a TOE-SB RCR technique because of the risk of medial row failure.
在尸体经骨等效缝线桥(TOE-SB)双排(DR)肩袖修复(RCR)模型中,比较内侧排缝线相对于肌腱结合部(MTJ)放置的生物力学性能。
采用TOE-SB DR技术在9对人尸体肩部重新附着实验性造成的冈上肌腱撕裂。内侧排缝线要么穿过MTJ附近(MTJ组),要么穿过MTJ外侧10毫米处(肩袖肌腱[RCT]组)。冈上肌修复后,对标本进行循环加载和破坏载荷测试。用光学跟踪系统测量附着在肌腱表面的标记物的局部位移。
与RCT组(0/9)相比,MTJ组内侧排失败率显著更高(P = .03)(5/9;循环测试中有3例,破坏载荷测试中有2例)。MTJ组在循环测试中完成循环的平均次数低于RCT组(77次对100次;P = .07),因为MTJ组有3个标本在循环加载过程中失败。在破坏载荷测试期间,两个研究组在生物力学性能方面没有显著差异。
在尸体TOE-SB DR RCR模型中,穿过MTJ的内侧排缝线导致内侧排失败率显著更高。
在伴有肌腱组织缺失的肩袖撕裂中,在TOE-SB RCR技术中应避免内侧排缝线穿过MTJ,因为存在内侧排失败的风险。