Suppr超能文献

关节镜下双排肩袖修补术中内侧和外侧排失败率及再撕裂的危险因素。

Rates of medial and lateral row failure and risk factors for Re-tear in arthroscopic double row rotator cuff repair.

作者信息

Turcotte Justin J, Kelly McKayla, West Michaline, Lashgari Cyrus, Petre Benjamin M, Redziniak Daniel E

机构信息

Anne Arundel Medical Center, Annapolis, MD, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2022 Nov 29;36:102083. doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2022.102083. eCollection 2023 Jan.

Abstract

A common postoperative complication after rotator cuff repair is re-tear requiring a secondary procedure. Double row and trans-osseous equivalent repair techniques have become increasingly popular in recent years, however repair failure remains a relatively common complication after primary rotator cuff repair. A retrospective observational study of 389 consecutive patients undergoing arthroscopic double-row rotator cuff repair from February 1, 2014 to March 31, 2020 was conducted. Univariate and multivariate statistics were used to assess differences in demographics, comorbidities, and tear characteristics between patients who experienced re-tear and those who did not. Repair failures were confirmed by plain MRI or intraoperatively during repeat surgical treatment. A subgroup analysis of patients who experienced re-tear due to medial row failure was conducted. The overall re-tear rate was 8.2% (32 patients). Six patients (1.5%) experienced medial row failure, while 26 patients (6.7%) experienced lateral row failure. The average time to re-tear was 279.3 ± 291.2 days. On multivariate analysis, patients with Goutallier Classification ≥3 (OR: 4.274, p = 0.046) and 3 anchor repair (OR: 5.387, p = 0.027) were at significantly increased risk for any re-tear after controlling for other tear characteristics. No statistically significant independent risk factors for medial row failure were identified after controlling for confounding variables. Goutallier classification greater than 3 and a primary repair with 3 anchors are significant risk factors for re-tear after double row rotator cuff repair, however they are not associated with increased occurrence of medial row failure. Further evaluation of risk factors for medial row failure is required to avoid this rare but serious re-tear pattern.

摘要

肩袖修复术后常见的并发症是再次撕裂,需要二次手术。近年来,双排和经骨等效修复技术越来越受欢迎,然而,初次肩袖修复术后修复失败仍然是一种相对常见的并发症。对2014年2月1日至2020年3月31日连续接受关节镜下双排肩袖修复的389例患者进行了一项回顾性观察研究。采用单因素和多因素统计方法评估再次撕裂患者和未再次撕裂患者在人口统计学、合并症和撕裂特征方面的差异。通过普通MRI或再次手术治疗期间的术中检查确认修复失败。对因内侧排失败而再次撕裂的患者进行了亚组分析。总体再次撕裂率为8.2%(32例患者)。6例患者(1.5%)出现内侧排失败,而26例患者(6.7%)出现外侧排失败。再次撕裂的平均时间为279.3±291.2天。多因素分析显示,在控制其他撕裂特征后,Goutallier分级≥3(OR:4.274,p = 0.046)和使用3枚锚钉修复(OR:5.387,p = 0.027)的患者再次撕裂的风险显著增加。在控制混杂变量后,未发现内侧排失败的统计学显著独立危险因素。Goutallier分级大于3和初次使用3枚锚钉修复是双排肩袖修复术后再次撕裂的重要危险因素,然而它们与内侧排失败发生率增加无关。需要进一步评估内侧排失败的危险因素,以避免这种罕见但严重的再次撕裂模式。

相似文献

1
Rates of medial and lateral row failure and risk factors for Re-tear in arthroscopic double row rotator cuff repair.
J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2022 Nov 29;36:102083. doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2022.102083. eCollection 2023 Jan.
2
What is the Optimal Construct to Reduce Failure in Arthroscopic Four Anchor Rotator Cuff Repair?
Shoulder Elbow. 2023 Nov;15(4 Suppl):33-39. doi: 10.1177/17585732221076066. Epub 2022 Feb 1.
3
Arthroscopic Knotless-Anchor Rotator Cuff Repair.
JBJS Essent Surg Tech. 2020 Sep 18;10(3). doi: 10.2106/JBJS.ST.19.00021. eCollection 2020 Jul-Sep.
5
Patient, imaging, and surgical factors associated with supraspinatus re-tear pattern after rotator cuff repair.
JSES Int. 2024 Jun 21;8(5):1045-1050. doi: 10.1016/j.jseint.2024.06.007. eCollection 2024 Sep.
6
Medialization of medial row anchor via the Nevasier portal yield enhanced footprint and outcomes in medium-to-large rotator cuff tears.
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2019 Dec;27(12):3989-3996. doi: 10.1007/s00167-019-05641-w. Epub 2019 Aug 2.
7
Magnetic resonance appearance of bioabsorbable anchor screws for double row arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs.
Indian J Orthop. 2015 Mar-Apr;49(2):164-70. doi: 10.4103/0019-5413.152452.
8
Two Techniques for Treating Medium-Sized Supraspinatus Tears: The Medially Based Single-Row Technique and the Suture Bridge Technique.
JBJS Essent Surg Tech. 2021 Jun 8;11(2). doi: 10.2106/JBJS.ST.20.00004. eCollection 2021 Apr-Jun.
9
The Relationship Between All-Suture and Solid Medial-Row Anchors and Patient-Reported Outcomes for Double-Row Suture Bridge Rotator Cuff Repair.
Orthop J Sports Med. 2024 Aug 7;12(8):23259671241262264. doi: 10.1177/23259671241262264. eCollection 2024 Aug.
10
Perianchor cyst formation in all-suture anchor after rotator cuff repair: an evaluation of anchor insertion angle.
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2022 Sep;31(9):1831-1839. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2022.02.028. Epub 2022 Apr 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Acceptability of biologic treatments to patients undergoing rotator cuff repair.
JSES Rev Rep Tech. 2025 Mar 9;5(3):407-412. doi: 10.1016/j.xrrt.2025.02.002. eCollection 2025 Aug.
2
A Narrative Review on the Double Pulley-Triple Row Technique for Large to Massive Rotator Cuff Repair.
Clin Orthop Surg. 2025 Jun;17(3):359-371. doi: 10.4055/cios24424. Epub 2025 May 15.
3
Sling Versus Abduction Brace Shoulder Immobilization After Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Orthop J Sports Med. 2023 Aug 1;11(8):23259671231185368. doi: 10.1177/23259671231185368. eCollection 2023 Aug.

本文引用的文献

1
What is the Optimal Construct to Reduce Failure in Arthroscopic Four Anchor Rotator Cuff Repair?
Shoulder Elbow. 2023 Nov;15(4 Suppl):33-39. doi: 10.1177/17585732221076066. Epub 2022 Feb 1.
3
Does Medial-Row Fixation Technique Affect the Retear Rate and Functional Outcomes After Double-Row Transosseous-Equivalent Rotator Cuff Repair?
Orthop J Sports Med. 2019 May 16;7(5):2325967119842881. doi: 10.1177/2325967119842881. eCollection 2019 May.
5
Recurrent tears of the rotator cuff: Effect of repair technique and management options.
Orthop Rev (Pavia). 2018 Jul 4;10(2):7593. doi: 10.4081/or.2018.7593. eCollection 2018 Jun 14.
6
Double row equivalent for rotator cuff repair: A biomechanical analysis of a new technique.
J Orthop. 2018 Mar 21;15(2):426-431. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2018.03.006. eCollection 2018 Jun.
7
The biology of rotator cuff healing.
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2017 Feb;103(1S):S1-S10. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2016.11.003. Epub 2017 Jan 2.
9
A Systematic Review of Preoperative Fatty Infiltration and Rotator Cuff Outcomes.
HSS J. 2016 Jul;12(2):170-6. doi: 10.1007/s11420-015-9465-5. Epub 2015 Sep 25.
10
Factors affecting healing after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.
World J Orthop. 2015 Mar 18;6(2):211-20. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v6.i2.211.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验