Turcotte Justin J, Kelly McKayla, West Michaline, Lashgari Cyrus, Petre Benjamin M, Redziniak Daniel E
Anne Arundel Medical Center, Annapolis, MD, USA.
J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2022 Nov 29;36:102083. doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2022.102083. eCollection 2023 Jan.
A common postoperative complication after rotator cuff repair is re-tear requiring a secondary procedure. Double row and trans-osseous equivalent repair techniques have become increasingly popular in recent years, however repair failure remains a relatively common complication after primary rotator cuff repair. A retrospective observational study of 389 consecutive patients undergoing arthroscopic double-row rotator cuff repair from February 1, 2014 to March 31, 2020 was conducted. Univariate and multivariate statistics were used to assess differences in demographics, comorbidities, and tear characteristics between patients who experienced re-tear and those who did not. Repair failures were confirmed by plain MRI or intraoperatively during repeat surgical treatment. A subgroup analysis of patients who experienced re-tear due to medial row failure was conducted. The overall re-tear rate was 8.2% (32 patients). Six patients (1.5%) experienced medial row failure, while 26 patients (6.7%) experienced lateral row failure. The average time to re-tear was 279.3 ± 291.2 days. On multivariate analysis, patients with Goutallier Classification ≥3 (OR: 4.274, p = 0.046) and 3 anchor repair (OR: 5.387, p = 0.027) were at significantly increased risk for any re-tear after controlling for other tear characteristics. No statistically significant independent risk factors for medial row failure were identified after controlling for confounding variables. Goutallier classification greater than 3 and a primary repair with 3 anchors are significant risk factors for re-tear after double row rotator cuff repair, however they are not associated with increased occurrence of medial row failure. Further evaluation of risk factors for medial row failure is required to avoid this rare but serious re-tear pattern.
肩袖修复术后常见的并发症是再次撕裂,需要二次手术。近年来,双排和经骨等效修复技术越来越受欢迎,然而,初次肩袖修复术后修复失败仍然是一种相对常见的并发症。对2014年2月1日至2020年3月31日连续接受关节镜下双排肩袖修复的389例患者进行了一项回顾性观察研究。采用单因素和多因素统计方法评估再次撕裂患者和未再次撕裂患者在人口统计学、合并症和撕裂特征方面的差异。通过普通MRI或再次手术治疗期间的术中检查确认修复失败。对因内侧排失败而再次撕裂的患者进行了亚组分析。总体再次撕裂率为8.2%(32例患者)。6例患者(1.5%)出现内侧排失败,而26例患者(6.7%)出现外侧排失败。再次撕裂的平均时间为279.3±291.2天。多因素分析显示,在控制其他撕裂特征后,Goutallier分级≥3(OR:4.274,p = 0.046)和使用3枚锚钉修复(OR:5.387,p = 0.027)的患者再次撕裂的风险显著增加。在控制混杂变量后,未发现内侧排失败的统计学显著独立危险因素。Goutallier分级大于3和初次使用3枚锚钉修复是双排肩袖修复术后再次撕裂的重要危险因素,然而它们与内侧排失败发生率增加无关。需要进一步评估内侧排失败的危险因素,以避免这种罕见但严重的再次撕裂模式。