Almonroeder Thomas G, Benson Lauren C
a Musculoskeletal Injury Biomechanics Laboratory, Department of Kinesiology , University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee , Milwaukee , WI , USA.
J Sports Sci. 2017 Aug;35(16):1575-1581. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2016.1225972. Epub 2016 Aug 29.
The incidence of patellofemoral pain (PFP) is 2 times greater in females compared with males of similar activity levels; however, the exact reason for this discrepancy remains unclear. Abnormal mechanics of the hip and knee in the sagittal, frontal, and transverse planes have been associated with an increased risk of PFP. The purpose of this study was to compare the mechanics of the lower extremity in males and females during running in order to better understand the reason(s) behind the sex discrepancy in PFP. Three-dimensional kinematic and kinetic data were collected as male and female participants completed overground running trials at a speed of 4.0 m · s (±5%). Patellofemoral joint stress (PFJS) was estimated using a sagittal plane knee model. The kinematics of the hip and knee in the frontal and transverse planes were also analysed. Male participants demonstrated significantly greater sagittal plane peak PFJS in comparison with the female participants (P < .001, ES = 1.9). However, the female participants demonstrated 3.5° greater peak hip adduction and 3.4° greater peak hip internal rotation (IR). As a result, it appears that the sex discrepancy in PFP is more likely to be related to differences in the kinematics of the hip in the frontal and transverse planes than differences in sagittal plane PFJS.
在活动水平相似的情况下,女性髌股关节疼痛(PFP)的发病率是男性的2倍;然而,这种差异的确切原因尚不清楚。矢状面、额状面和横断面的髋部和膝部异常力学与PFP风险增加有关。本研究的目的是比较男性和女性在跑步过程中下肢的力学情况,以便更好地理解PFP性别差异背后的原因。当男性和女性参与者以4.0 m·s(±5%)的速度完成地面跑步试验时,收集了三维运动学和动力学数据。使用矢状面膝关节模型估计髌股关节应力(PFJS)。还分析了额状面和横断面的髋部和膝部运动学。与女性参与者相比,男性参与者在矢状面的PFJS峰值显著更高(P <.001,效应量=1.9)。然而,女性参与者的髋部内收峰值大3.5°,髋部内旋(IR)峰值大3.4°。因此,PFP的性别差异似乎更可能与额状面和横断面的髋部运动学差异有关,而不是矢状面PFJS的差异。