Department of Physiotherapy, São Carlos Federal University, São Carlos, Brazil.
University Centre UNA Pouso Alegre, Pouso Alegre, MG, Brazil.
Sports Health. 2022 Nov-Dec;14(6):822-828. doi: 10.1177/19417381221088582. Epub 2022 May 20.
Altered kinematics have been frequently observed in runners with patellofemoral pain (PFP), and few studies have aimed to understand the influence of sex on kinematics of this population. The aim of this study was to investigate whether altered hip and knee kinematics in runners with PFP are sex specific.
Kinematics will be different between female and male runners with and without PFP.
Case-control study.
Level 2.
Eighty-four runners were divided into 4 groups: 42 runners with PFP (20 women, 22 men) and 42 asymptomatic runners (21 women, 21 men). Three-dimensional gait analyses of the hip in the frontal and transverse plane and the knee in the frontal plane were analyzed at self-selected running speed on a treadmill. One-way analysis of covariance was used to test for differences in kinematic variables between groups.
Women with PFP ran with a significantly greater peak hip adduction compared with men with PFP (mean difference [MD] = 4.45°; = 0.00; effect size [ES] = 0.58) and male control subjects (MD = 4.2°; = 0.01; ES = 0.54) and greater hip adduction range of motion (ROM) than men with PFP (MD = 3.44°; = 0.01; ES = 0.49). No significant differences were identified between women with and without PFP. Female control subjects ran with greater peak hip adduction than men with PFP (MD = 5.46°; < 0.01; ES = 0.58) and male control subjects (MD = 5.21°; < 0.01; ES = 0.55); greater hip adduction ROM than men with PFP (MD = 4.02°; = 0.00; ES = 0.52) and male control subjects (MD = 2.91°; = 0.04; ES = 0.36); and greater peak knee abduction than men with PFP (MD = 3.35°; = 0.02; ES = 0.44) and male control subjects (MD = 3.69°; = 0.01; ES = 0.4).
Women have greater hip adduction than men regardless of the presence of PFP. There were no kinematics difference between women with and without PFP. Comparisons of hip internal rotation between all groups were nonsignificant.
Altered hip and knee kinematics does not appear to be sex specific in runners with PFP.
髌股疼痛(PFP)患者常出现运动学改变,鲜有研究旨在了解性别对该人群运动学的影响。本研究旨在探讨 PFP 跑者的髋关节和膝关节运动学改变是否具有性别特异性。
PFP 跑者与无 PFP 跑者的性别间,髋关节和膝关节运动学存在差异。
病例对照研究
2 级
84 名跑者分为 4 组:42 名 PFP 跑者(20 名女性,22 名男性)和 42 名无症状跑者(21 名女性,21 名男性)。在跑步机上以自选择速度进行三维步态分析,分析髋关节在额状面和横断面上、膝关节在额状面上的运动学。采用单因素协方差分析比较组间运动学变量的差异。
与男性 PFP 跑者和男性对照组相比,女性 PFP 跑者的髋关节最大内收角度显著增大(MD=4.45°;=0.00;ES=0.58)和髋关节内收活动范围(MD=3.44°;=0.01;ES=0.49)更大。女性 PFP 跑者与无 PFP 女性跑者间无显著差异。与男性 PFP 跑者和男性对照组相比,女性对照组的髋关节最大内收角度更大(MD=5.46°;<0.01;ES=0.58)和髋关节内收活动范围更大(MD=4.02°;=0.00;ES=0.52)。与男性 PFP 跑者和男性对照组相比,女性对照组的最大膝关节外展角度更大(MD=3.35°;=0.02;ES=0.44)。
无论是否存在 PFP,女性的髋关节内收角度均大于男性。PFP 女性跑者与无 PFP 女性跑者的运动学无差异。所有组间髋关节内旋的比较均无统计学意义。
在 PFP 跑者中,髋关节和膝关节运动学改变似乎没有性别特异性。