Toledano Beatriz, Bisbal Felipe, Camara Maria Luisa, Labata Carlos, Berastegui Elisabet, Gálvez-Montón Carolina, Villuendas Roger, Sarrias Axel, Oliveres Teresa, Pereferrer Damià, Ruyra Xavier, Bayés-Genís Antoni
Department of Cardiology, Heart Institute-Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Spain.
Department of Cardiology, Heart Institute-Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Spain
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2016 Dec;23(6):861-868. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivw259. Epub 2016 Aug 29.
In high-risk patients with severe aortic stenosis, aortic valve replacement (AVR) with a sutureless Perceval prosthesis (SU-AVR) can be performed instead of conventional AVR or transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Little data are available regarding postoperative conduction disorders after SU-AVR. We aimed to determine the incidence and predictors of new-onset complete atrioventricular block (NO-AVB) requiring permanent cardiac stimulation following SU-AVR.
We studied consecutive patients who underwent SU-AVR between 2013 and 2015. Early patients underwent partial aortic decalcification and subannular valve implantation (standard technique), while later patients underwent complete/symmetrical decalcification and intra-annular valve deployment (modified technique). Predictive baseline and procedural variables and electrocardiographic parameters were identified using a logistic regression model.
We included 140 patients (mean age, 78 ± 6.5 years; mean Log EuroSCORE II, 8.9 ± 10%; 28.6% concomitant myocardial revascularization). The most common postoperative conduction disturbances were LBBB (25%), NO-AVB (12.1%) and first-degree atrioventricular block (AVB) (7.9%). The incidence of NO-AVB was 61% lower with the modified versus the standard technique (P= 0.04). NO-AVB predominantly appeared within 24 h post-surgery, occurring >24 h post-surgery in only 2 patients (both with baseline conduction defects). Independent predictors of NO-AVB included baseline left QRS axis deviation (LaQD; P= 0.03), first-degree AVB (P< 0.01) and standard surgical technique (P= 0.02).
NO-AVB is a frequent complication following SU-AVR, and its incidence strongly depends on the surgical technique. Baseline first-degree AVB and LaQD independently predict NO-AVB and should be considered when deciding the duration of postoperative electrocardiographic monitoring.
在重度主动脉瓣狭窄的高危患者中,可采用无缝合Perceval人工瓣膜进行主动脉瓣置换术(SU-AVR),以替代传统的主动脉瓣置换术或经导管主动脉瓣植入术。关于SU-AVR术后传导障碍的数据较少。我们旨在确定SU-AVR术后需要永久性心脏起搏的新发完全性房室传导阻滞(NO-AVB)的发生率及预测因素。
我们研究了2013年至2015年间连续接受SU-AVR的患者。早期患者接受部分主动脉去钙化和瓣环下瓣膜植入(标准技术),而后期患者接受完全/对称去钙化和瓣环内瓣膜置入(改良技术)。使用逻辑回归模型确定预测性基线和手术变量以及心电图参数。
我们纳入了140例患者(平均年龄78±6.5岁;平均欧洲心脏手术风险评估系统II分值8.9±10%;28.6%合并心肌血运重建)。最常见的术后传导障碍为左束支传导阻滞(25%)、NO-AVB(12.1%)和一度房室传导阻滞(AVB)(7.9%)。改良技术组的NO-AVB发生率比标准技术组低61%(P=0.04)。NO-AVB主要出现在术后24小时内,仅2例患者(均有基线传导缺陷)在术后>24小时出现。NO-AVB的独立预测因素包括基线左QRS轴偏移(LaQD;P=0.03)、一度AVB(P<0.01)和标准手术技术(P=0.02)。
NO-AVB是SU-AVR术后常见的并发症,其发生率很大程度上取决于手术技术。基线一度AVB和LaQD可独立预测NO-AVB,在决定术后心电图监测时长时应予以考虑。