• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经 CoreValve 器械行经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVI)后无 QRS 延长的患者不会发生高度房室传导阻滞。

Patients without prolonged QRS after TAVI with CoreValve device do not experience high-degree atrio-ventricular block.

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Hôpital Henri Mondor, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris and INSERM U 955, 51 Avenue du Maréchal de Lattre de Tassigny, Creteil, France.

出版信息

Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Apr;81(5):882-7. doi: 10.1002/ccd.24657. Epub 2012 Dec 3.

DOI:10.1002/ccd.24657
PMID:22972678
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To identify clinical and electrical factors predicting delayed high-degree atrio-ventricular block (AVB) after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI).

BACKGROUND

TAVI is a new technique for treating severe aortic valve stenosis in patients at high surgical risk but can be followed by high-grade AVB requiring permanent pacing (PP).

METHODS AND RESULTS

The study included 79 patients (82 ± 17 years, Euroscore = 23% ± 10%) free of PP need before and immediately after TAVI procedure. Delayed high-degree AVB was defined by types 2 or 3 AVB diagnosed at least 24 hr after the index procedure. Permanent pacemaker implantation was performed for all these patients. We compared clinical and electrical variables before and after TAVI in patients with delayed AVB or not. TAVI was performed successfully in all patients. The 21 (26%) patients who exhibited delayed high-grade AVB had significantly deeper prosthesis implantation (12 ± 4 mm vs. 9 ± 5 mm, P = 0.03) and wider post-TAVI QRS duration (155 ± 17 msec vs. 131 ± 25 msec, P = 0.0004), with no difference in baseline QRS duration. Post-TAVI QRS duration was the only independent predictor of post-TAVI permanent for delayed high-degree AVB (P = 0.02). After a mean follow-up of 10 ± 8 months, all 21 patients with post-TAVI QRS ≤ 128 msec were free of high-grade AVB, whereas 21/55 (38%) patients with post-TAVI QRS >128 msec had PP (P = 0.0016).

CONCLUSION

Delayed (>24 hr after the procedure) high-grade AVB necessitating PP is common after TAVI. QRS duration measured immediately after TAVI was the best independent predictor of PP in this population. Patients with QRS ≤ 128 msec immediately after TAVI had no risk of requiring PP.

摘要

目的

确定经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVI)后发生迟发性高度房室传导阻滞(AVB)的临床和电生理预测因素。

背景

TAVI 是一种治疗高危外科手术的严重主动脉瓣狭窄的新技术,但可能导致需要永久性起搏(PP)的高级别 AVB。

方法和结果

该研究纳入 79 例患者(82 ± 17 岁,Euroscore = 23% ± 10%),TAVI 术前和术后即刻均无需 PP。迟发性高度 AVB 定义为指数术后至少 24 小时诊断的 2 型或 3 型 AVB。所有这些患者均进行了永久性起搏器植入。我们比较了迟发性 AVB 患者与非迟发性 AVB 患者的 TAVI 前后临床和电生理变量。所有患者均成功完成 TAVI。21 例(26%)患者出现迟发性高度 AVB,其假体植入深度明显更深(12 ± 4mm 比 9 ± 5mm,P = 0.03),TAVI 后 QRS 持续时间更宽(155 ± 17msec 比 131 ± 25msec,P = 0.0004),但基线 QRS 持续时间无差异。TAVI 后 QRS 持续时间是迟发性高度 AVB 后 TAVI 永久性的唯一独立预测因素(P = 0.02)。平均 10 ± 8 个月的随访后,所有 TAVI 后 QRS ≤ 128msec 的 21 例患者均无高级别 AVB,而 TAVI 后 QRS >128msec 的 21/55(38%)例患者需要 PP(P = 0.0016)。

结论

TAVI 后需要 PP 的迟发性(术后 >24 小时)高级别 AVB 较为常见。TAVI 后即刻测量的 QRS 持续时间是该人群中预测 PP 的最佳独立指标。TAVI 后即刻 QRS ≤ 128msec 的患者无需要 PP 的风险。

相似文献

1
Patients without prolonged QRS after TAVI with CoreValve device do not experience high-degree atrio-ventricular block.经 CoreValve 器械行经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVI)后无 QRS 延长的患者不会发生高度房室传导阻滞。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Apr;81(5):882-7. doi: 10.1002/ccd.24657. Epub 2012 Dec 3.
2
Conduction disturbances and permanent cardiac pacing after transcatheter implantation of the CoreValve aortic bioprosthesis: initial single centre experience.经导管植入 CoreValve 主动脉生物瓣后的传导障碍和永久性心脏起搏:初始单中心经验。
Kardiol Pol. 2012;70(2):121-8.
3
Predictors for new-onset complete heart block after transcatheter aortic valve implantation.经导管主动脉瓣置换术后新发完全性心脏传导阻滞的预测因素。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2010 May;3(5):524-30. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2010.01.017.
4
Need for permanent pacemaker as a complication of transcatheter aortic valve implantation and surgical aortic valve replacement in elderly patients with severe aortic stenosis and similar baseline electrocardiographic findings.老年重度主动脉瓣狭窄患者行经导管主动脉瓣植入术和外科主动脉瓣置换术后需要永久性起搏器作为并发症,且两组患者基线心电图结果相似。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2012 May;5(5):540-551. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2012.03.004.
5
Risk for permanent pacemaker after transcatheter aortic valve implantation: a comprehensive analysis of the literature.经导管主动脉瓣植入术后永久起搏器植入的风险:文献综合分析。
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2012 Apr;23(4):391-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8167.2011.02211.x. Epub 2011 Nov 3.
6
Baseline HV-interval predicts complete AV-block secondary to transcatheter aortic valve implantation.基线 HV 间期可预测经导管主动脉瓣植入术后继发的完全性房室传导阻滞。
Acta Cardiol. 2015 Oct;70(5):574-80. doi: 10.2143/AC.70.5.3110518.
7
Reevaluation of the indications for permanent pacemaker implantation after transcatheter aortic valve implantation.经导管主动脉瓣植入术后永久性起搏器植入适应证的重新评估
J Invasive Cardiol. 2014 Feb;26(2):94-9.
8
Impact of aortic valve calcification on the outcome of transcatheter aortic valve implantation: results from the prospective multicenter German TAVI registry.主动脉瓣钙化对经导管主动脉瓣植入术结果的影响:前瞻性多中心德国 TAVI 注册研究结果。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Feb;81(2):348-55. doi: 10.1002/ccd.24332. Epub 2012 May 4.
9
Predictive factors and long-term clinical consequences of persistent left bundle branch block following transcatheter aortic valve implantation with a balloon-expandable valve.经皮球囊扩张式主动脉瓣置换术后持续性左束支传导阻滞的预测因素及长期临床转归。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012 Oct 30;60(18):1743-52. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.07.035. Epub 2012 Oct 3.
10
Electrocardiographic and imaging predictors for permanent pacemaker requirement after transcatheter aortic valve implantation.经导管主动脉瓣植入术后永久性起搏器需求的心电图和影像学预测指标
J Heart Valve Dis. 2011 Jan;20(1):83-90.

引用本文的文献

1
Contributions of France to the field of clinical cardiac electrophysiology and pacing.法国对临床心脏电生理学和起搏领域的贡献。
Heart Rhythm O2. 2024 Jul 19;5(7):490-514. doi: 10.1016/j.hroo.2024.02.005. eCollection 2024 Jul.
2
Left ventricular mechanical dispersion as a predictor of the need for pacemaker implantation after transcatheter aortic valve implantation: MeDiPace TAVI study.经导管主动脉瓣植入术后左心室机械离散度预测起搏器植入需求的研究:MeDiPace TAVI 研究。
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2024 Mar 27;25(4):539-547. doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jead315.
3
Predictors of Permanent Pacemaker Implantation in Patients After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in a Chinese Population.
中国人群经导管主动脉瓣置换术后永久性起搏器植入的预测因素
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Jan 6;8:743257. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.743257. eCollection 2021.
4
Predictors of Permanent Pacemaker Implantation in Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement - A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.经导管主动脉瓣置换术后患者行永久性心脏起搏器植入的预测因素:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2021 Jul 20;10(14):e020906. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.121.020906. Epub 2021 Jul 14.
5
TAVI and Post Procedural Cardiac Conduction Abnormalities.经导管主动脉瓣置入术与术后心脏传导异常
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2018 Jul 3;5:85. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2018.00085. eCollection 2018.
6
Permanent-temporary pacemakers in the management of patients with conduction abnormalities after transcatheter aortic valve replacement.永久-临时起搏器在经导管主动脉瓣置换术后传导异常患者管理中的应用
J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2018 Jun;52(1):111-116. doi: 10.1007/s10840-018-0345-z. Epub 2018 Mar 12.
7
Conduction abnormalities after transcatheter aortic valve implantation.经导管主动脉瓣植入术后的传导异常。
J Geriatr Cardiol. 2018 Jan;15(1):105-112. doi: 10.11909/j.issn.1671-5411.2018.01.004.
8
Conduction disturbances after transcatheter aortic valve implantation procedures - predictors and management.经导管主动脉瓣植入术后的传导障碍——预测因素与管理
Postepy Kardiol Interwencyjnej. 2016;12(3):203-11. doi: 10.5114/aic.2016.61640. Epub 2016 Aug 19.
9
Management of Coronary Artery Disease and Conduction Abnormalities in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation.经导管主动脉瓣植入术中冠状动脉疾病和传导异常的管理
Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med. 2016 Feb;18(2):9. doi: 10.1007/s11936-015-0432-8.
10
Clinical significance of conduction disturbances after aortic valve intervention: current evidence.主动脉瓣介入治疗后传导障碍的临床意义:现有证据。
Clin Res Cardiol. 2015 Jan;104(1):1-12. doi: 10.1007/s00392-014-0739-6. Epub 2014 Jul 4.