Obermannová R, Van Cutsem E, Yoshino T, Bodoky G, Prausová J, Garcia-Carbonero R, Ciuleanu T, Garcia Alfonso P, Portnoy D, Cohn A, Yamazaki K, Clingan P, Lonardi S, Kim T W, Yang L, Nasroulah F, Tabernero J
Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, Brno, Czech Republic
University Hospitals Leuven and KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Ann Oncol. 2016 Nov;27(11):2082-2090. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdw402. Epub 2016 Aug 29.
The RAISE phase III clinical trial demonstrated that ramucirumab + FOLFIRI improved overall survival (OS) [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.844, P = 0.0219] and progression-free survival (PFS) (HR = 0.793, P < 0.0005) compared with placebo + FOLFIRI for second-line metastatic colorectal carcinoma (mCRC) patients previously treated with first-line bevacizumab, oxaliplatin, and a fluoropyrimidine. Since some patient or disease characteristics could be associated with differential efficacy or safety, prespecified subgroup analyses were undertaken. This report focuses on three of the most relevant ones: KRAS status (wild-type versus mutant), age (<65 versus ≥65 years), and time to progression (TTP) on first-line therapy (<6 versus ≥6 months).
OS and PFS were evaluated by the Kaplan-Meier analysis, with HR determined by the Cox proportional hazards model. Treatment-by-subgroup interaction was tested to determine whether treatment effect was consistent between subgroup pairs.
Patients with both wild-type and mutant KRAS benefited from ramucirumab + FOLFIRI treatment over placebo + FOLFIRI (interaction P = 0.526); although numerically, wild-type KRAS patients benefited more (wild-type KRAS: median OS = 14.4 versus 11.9 months, HR = 0.82, P = 0.049; mutant KRAS: median OS = 12.7 versus 11.3 months, HR = 0.89, P = 0.263). Patients with both longer and shorter first-line TTP benefited from ramucirumab (interaction P = 0.9434), although TTP <6 months was associated with poorer OS (TTP ≥6 months: median OS = 14.3 versus 12.5 months, HR = 0.86, P = 0.061; TTP <6 months: median OS = 10.4 versus 8.0 months, HR = 0.86, P = 0.276). The subgroups of patients ≥65 versus <65 years also derived a similar ramucirumab survival benefit (interaction P = 0.9521) (≥65 years: median OS = 13.8 versus 11.7 months, HR = 0.85, P = 0.156; <65 years: median OS = 13.1 versus 11.9 months, HR = 0.86, P = 0.098). The safety profile of ramucirumab + FOLFIRI was similar across subgroups.
These analyses revealed similar efficacy and safety among patient subgroups with differing KRAS mutation status, longer or shorter first-line TTP, and age. Ramucirumab is a beneficial addition to second-line FOLFIRI treatment for a wide range of patients with mCRC.
ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01183780.
RAISE Ⅲ期临床试验表明,对于先前接受过一线贝伐单抗、奥沙利铂和氟嘧啶治疗的二线转移性结直肠癌(mCRC)患者,雷莫西尤单抗 + FOLFIRI 方案与安慰剂 + FOLFIRI 方案相比,可改善总生存期(OS)[风险比(HR)= 0.844,P = 0.0219]和无进展生存期(PFS)(HR = 0.793,P < 0.0005)。由于某些患者或疾病特征可能与疗效或安全性差异相关,因此进行了预设的亚组分析。本报告重点关注三个最相关的因素:KRAS 状态(野生型与突变型)、年龄(<65 岁与≥65 岁)以及一线治疗的疾病进展时间(TTP)(<6 个月与≥6 个月)。
采用 Kaplan-Meier 分析评估 OS 和 PFS,通过 Cox 比例风险模型确定 HR。进行治疗与亚组的交互作用检验,以确定亚组对之间的治疗效果是否一致。
KRAS 野生型和突变型患者均从雷莫西尤单抗 + FOLFIRI 治疗中比安慰剂 + FOLFIRI 治疗中获益(交互作用 P = 0.526);尽管从数值上看,KRAS 野生型患者获益更多(KRAS 野生型:中位 OS = 14.4 个月对 11.9 个月,HR = 0.82,P = 0.049;KRAS 突变型:中位 OS = 12.7 个月对 11.3 个月,HR = 0.89,P = 0.263)。一线 TTP 长和短的患者均从雷莫西尤单抗治疗中获益(交互作用 P = 0.9434),尽管 TTP <6 个月与较差的 OS 相关(TTP≥6 个月:中位 OS = 14.3 个月对 12.5 个月,HR = 0.86,P = 0.061;TTP <6 个月:中位 OS = 10.4 个月对 8.0 个月,HR = 0.86,P = 0.276)。≥65 岁与<65 岁的患者亚组也从雷莫西尤单抗治疗中获得了相似的生存获益(交互作用 P = 0.9521)(≥65 岁:中位 OS = 13.8 个月对 11.7 个月,HR = 0.85,P = 0.156;<65 岁:中位 OS = 13.1 个月对 11.9 个月,HR = 0.86,P = 0.098)。雷莫西尤单抗 + FOLFIRI 的安全性在各亚组中相似。
这些分析显示,在 KRAS 突变状态不同、一线 TTP 长短不同以及年龄不同的患者亚组中,疗效和安全性相似。雷莫西尤单抗是二线 FOLFIRI 治疗广泛 mCRC 患者的有益补充。
ClinicalTrials.gov,NCT01183780。