• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

肝切除术联合热消融治疗结直肠癌肝转移的教材结果实现。

Achievement of textbook outcome after hepatectomy combined with thermal ablation for colorectal liver metastases.

机构信息

Hepato-biliary and Transplant Unit, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.

Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2024 May;38(5):2611-2621. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-10757-3. Epub 2024 Mar 18.

DOI:10.1007/s00464-024-10757-3
PMID:38499784
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Hepatic resection combined with intraoperative ablation has been described as a technical solution potentially widening the resectability rate of patients with colorectal liver metastases (CRLM). Nevertheless, the perioperative and oncological benefit provided by this combined approach remains unclear. We hypothesized that textbook outcome (TO), which is a composite measure achieved for patients for whom some desired health indicators are met, may help to refine the indications of this approach.

METHODS

Patients submitted to hepatectomy with curative intent in combination with radiofrequency ablation or microwave ablation for CRLM ≤ 3 cm in two tertiary referral centers were included. TO was defined according to a recent definition for liver surgery based on a Delphi process including also the achievement of complete radiological response of the ablated lesion/s at 4 weeks.

RESULTS

Between 2015 and 2022, 112 patients were enrolled. Among them, 63 (56.2%) achieved a TO. According to multivariate analysis, minimally invasive (MI) approach (OR 2.72, 95% CI 0.99-7.48, p = 0.050), simultaneous CR resection (OR 0.28, 95% CI 0.11-0.70, p = 0.007), tumor burden score (OR 0.89, 95% CI 0.82-0.96, p = 0.004), and major hepatectomy (OR 0.12, 95% CI 0.03-0.52, p = 0.004) were significantly associated with the achievement of TO. Median overall survival was longer in those patients who were able to achieve a TO compared to those who did not.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of hepatectomy and ablation constitutes a valuable solution in patients affected by multiple CRLM and it may provide, also using a MI approach, adequate perioperative and oncological outcomes, allowing to achieve TO, however, in a selected number of patients and depending on several factors including the burden of disease.

摘要

背景

肝切除术联合术中消融已被描述为一种技术解决方案,可能扩大结直肠癌肝转移(CRLM)患者的可切除率。然而,这种联合方法的围手术期和肿瘤学益处仍不清楚。我们假设,教科书结果(TO)是一种综合衡量标准,适用于满足某些期望健康指标的患者,可能有助于细化该方法的适应证。

方法

本研究纳入了在两个三级转诊中心接受以治愈为目的的肝切除术联合射频消融或微波消融治疗≤3cm CRLM 的患者。TO 根据最近基于德尔菲过程的肝外科定义定义,该定义还包括在 4 周时消融病灶/的完全放射学反应的实现。

结果

2015 年至 2022 年期间,共纳入 112 例患者。其中,63 例(56.2%)达到了 TO。多因素分析显示,微创(MI)方法(OR 2.72,95%CI 0.99-7.48,p=0.050)、同期结直肠切除(OR 0.28,95%CI 0.11-0.70,p=0.007)、肿瘤负荷评分(OR 0.89,95%CI 0.82-0.96,p=0.004)和广泛肝切除术(OR 0.12,95%CI 0.03-0.52,p=0.004)与 TO 的实现显著相关。与未能达到 TO 的患者相比,达到 TO 的患者的中位总生存期更长。

结论

肝切除术联合消融术在患有多发 CRLM 的患者中是一种有价值的解决方案,它可以提供足够的围手术期和肿瘤学结果,即使采用微创方法,也可以使患者达到 TO,但这需要在少数患者中,并取决于多种因素,包括疾病负担。

相似文献

1
Achievement of textbook outcome after hepatectomy combined with thermal ablation for colorectal liver metastases.肝切除术联合热消融治疗结直肠癌肝转移的教材结果实现。
Surg Endosc. 2024 May;38(5):2611-2621. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-10757-3. Epub 2024 Mar 18.
2
Radiofrequency ablation in the treatment of liver metastases from colorectal cancer.射频消融治疗结直肠癌肝转移
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Jun 13;2012(6):CD006317. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006317.pub3.
3
Radiofrequency (thermal) ablation versus no intervention or other interventions for hepatocellular carcinoma.射频(热)消融术与不干预或其他干预措施治疗肝细胞癌的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Dec 19;2013(12):CD003046. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003046.pub3.
4
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
5
Laparoscopic versus open liver resection for colorectal liver metastases: A systematic review and meta-analysis of studies with propensity score-based analysis.腹腔镜与开腹肝切除术治疗结直肠癌肝转移:基于倾向评分匹配分析的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Surg. 2017 Aug;44:191-203. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2017.05.073. Epub 2017 Jun 2.
6
Comparison of Two Modern Survival Prediction Tools, SORG-MLA and METSSS, in Patients With Symptomatic Long-bone Metastases Who Underwent Local Treatment With Surgery Followed by Radiotherapy and With Radiotherapy Alone.两种现代生存预测工具 SORG-MLA 和 METSSS 在接受手术联合放疗和单纯放疗治疗有症状长骨转移患者中的比较。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Dec 1;482(12):2193-2208. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003185. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
7
Thermal ablation versus surgical resection of small-size colorectal liver metastases (COLLISION): an international, randomised, controlled, phase 3 non-inferiority trial.小尺寸结直肠癌肝转移灶的热消融与手术切除对比研究(COLLISION):一项国际、随机、对照、3期非劣效性试验
Lancet Oncol. 2025 Feb;26(2):187-199. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(24)00660-0. Epub 2025 Jan 20.
8
The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of ablative therapies in the management of liver metastases: systematic review and economic evaluation.消融疗法治疗肝转移瘤的临床疗效和成本效果:系统评价和经济评估。
Health Technol Assess. 2014 Jan;18(7):vii-viii, 1-283. doi: 10.3310/hta18070.
9
Does Augmenting Irradiated Autografts With Free Vascularized Fibula Graft in Patients With Bone Loss From a Malignant Tumor Achieve Union, Function, and Complication Rate Comparably to Patients Without Bone Loss and Augmentation When Reconstructing Intercalary Resections in the Lower Extremity?对于因恶性肿瘤导致骨缺损的患者,在重建下肢节段性切除时,采用带血管游离腓骨移植来增强照射后的自体骨移植,其骨愈合、功能及并发症发生率与无骨缺损且未进行增强的患者相比是否相当?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Jun 26. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003599.
10
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.系统性药理学治疗慢性斑块状银屑病:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 19;4(4):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub4.

引用本文的文献

1
Laparoscopic resection combined with ablation for multiple colorectal liver metastases: a multicentre propensity-matched analysis.腹腔镜切除术联合消融治疗多发性结直肠癌肝转移:一项多中心倾向匹配分析
Surg Endosc. 2025 Aug 13. doi: 10.1007/s00464-025-12040-5.
2
How Can We Improve the Survival of Patients with Colorectal Liver Metastases Using Thermal Ablation?我们如何通过热消融提高结直肠癌肝转移患者的生存率?
Cancers (Basel). 2025 Jan 9;17(2):199. doi: 10.3390/cancers17020199.

本文引用的文献

1
A prospective multicentre trial on survival after Microwave Ablation VErsus Resection for Resectable Colorectal liver metastases (MAVERRIC).微波消融与切除术治疗可切除结直肠癌肝转移的生存前瞻性多中心研究(MAVERRIC)。
Eur J Cancer. 2023 Jul;187:65-76. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2023.03.038. Epub 2023 Apr 5.
2
Textbook Outcomes in Liver Surgery: a Systematic Review.教科书式肝外科手术结局:系统综述。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2023 Jun;27(6):1277-1289. doi: 10.1007/s11605-023-05673-1. Epub 2023 Apr 17.
3
Combined Ablation and Resection for Colorectal Liver Metastases in the Minimally Invasive Surgical Era.
微创外科时代结直肠癌肝转移的联合消融与切除术
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2023 Apr 1;33(2):121-128. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000001153.
4
Defining a textbook outcome for the resection of colorectal liver metastases.定义结直肠肝转移切除的教科书式结局。
J Surg Oncol. 2023 Mar;127(4):616-624. doi: 10.1002/jso.27170. Epub 2022 Dec 21.
5
An International Expert Delphi Consensus on Defining Textbook Outcome in Liver Surgery (TOLS).国际专家德尔菲共识:定义肝脏外科教科书结局(TOLS)
Ann Surg. 2023 May 1;277(5):821-828. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000005668. Epub 2022 Aug 10.
6
Safety and efficacy of percutaneous radiofrequency ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma: a textbook outcome analysis.经皮射频消融治疗肝细胞癌的安全性和有效性:教科书式结局分析
HPB (Oxford). 2022 May;24(5):664-671. doi: 10.1016/j.hpb.2021.09.016. Epub 2021 Sep 24.
7
Incidence and predictors of textbook outcome after simultaneous liver and rectal surgeries for Stage IV rectal cancer.同时行肝直肠手术治疗 IV 期直肠癌的教科书结局的发生率和预测因素。
Colorectal Dis. 2022 Jan;24(1):50-58. doi: 10.1111/codi.15912. Epub 2021 Sep 24.
8
Impact of Tumor Burden Score on Conditional Survival after Curative-Intent Resection for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Multi-Institutional Analysis.肿瘤负担评分对肝癌根治性切除术后条件生存的影响:多机构分析。
World J Surg. 2021 Nov;45(11):3438-3448. doi: 10.1007/s00268-021-06265-3. Epub 2021 Aug 2.
9
ASO Author Reflections: The Liver-First Approach: A New Standard for Patients with Multiple Bilobar Colorectal Metastases?《美国外科医师学会杂志》作者反思:肝优先治疗法:多叶结直肠癌转移患者的新标准?
Ann Surg Oncol. 2021 Dec;28(13):8209-8210. doi: 10.1245/s10434-021-10272-y. Epub 2021 Jul 26.
10
Oncological outcome of R1 vascular margin for mass-forming cholangiocarcinoma. A single center observational cohort analysis.肿块型胆管细胞癌 R1 血管切缘的肿瘤学结果。一项单中心观察性队列分析。
HPB (Oxford). 2020 Apr;22(4):570-577. doi: 10.1016/j.hpb.2019.08.015. Epub 2019 Sep 14.