Optom Vis Sci. 2016 Dec;93(12):1457-1465. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000000975.
To compare the effectiveness of home-based (HB) computer vergence/accommodative therapy (HB-C) to HB near target push-up therapy (HB-PU) and to HB placebo treatment (HB-P) among children aged 9 to <18 years with symptomatic convergence insufficiency (CI).
In this multicenter randomized clinical trial, participants were randomly assigned to computer therapy, near target push-ups, or placebo. All therapy was prescribed for 5 days per week at home. A successful outcome at 12 weeks was based on meeting predetermined composite criteria for the CI Symptom Survey, near point of convergence, and positive fusional vergence at near.
A total of 204 participants were randomly assigned to HB-C (n = 75), HB-PU (n = 85), or HB-P (n = 44). At 12 weeks, 16 of 69 (23%, 95% CI: 14-35%) in the HB-C group, 15 of 69 (22%, 95% CI: 13-33%) in the HB-PU group, and 5 of 31 (16%, 95% CI: 5-34%) in the HB-P group were classified as having a successful outcome. The difference in the percentage of participants with a successful outcome in the HB-C group compared with the HB-PU group was -4% (two-sided 97.5% CI: -19 to +11%; p = 0.56) and with the HB-P group was +5% (two-sided 97.5% CI: -12 to +22%; p = 0.52), adjusted for baseline levels of the composite outcome components.
The majority of participants with symptomatic CI did not have a successful outcome at 12 weeks. Some participants treated with placebo were successful. With recruitment reaching only 34% of that originally planned and differential loss to follow-up among groups, estimates of success are not precise and comparisons across groups are difficult to interpret.
比较家庭式(HB)电脑融合/调节训练(HB-C)、家庭式近目标俯卧撑训练(HB-PU)和家庭式安慰剂治疗(HB-P)对9至18岁有症状性集合不足(CI)儿童的疗效。
在这项多中心随机临床试验中,参与者被随机分配接受电脑训练、近目标俯卧撑训练或安慰剂治疗。所有治疗均规定每周在家进行5天。12周时的成功结果基于达到CI症状调查、近点集合和近距离正融合性集合的预定综合标准。
共有204名参与者被随机分配到HB-C组(n = 75)、HB-PU组(n = 85)或HB-P组(n = 44)。12周时,HB-C组69名中有16名(23%,95%可信区间:14 - 35%)、HB-PU组69名中有15名(22%,95%可信区间:13 - 33%)、HB-P组31名中有5名(16%,95%可信区间:5 - 34%)被归类为有成功结果。与HB-PU组相比,HB-C组有成功结果的参与者百分比差异为 -4%(双侧97.5%可信区间:-19至 +11%;p = 0.56),与HB-P组相比为 +5%(双侧97.5%可信区间:-12至 +22%;p = 0.52),已根据综合结果成分的基线水平进行调整。
大多数有症状性CI的参与者在12周时没有成功结果。一些接受安慰剂治疗的参与者获得了成功。由于招募人数仅达到原计划的34%,且各小组随访失访情况不同,成功的估计并不精确,各小组之间的比较难以解释。