Janofsky J S, Vandewalle M B, Rappeport J R
Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD 21205.
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 1989;17(2):203-11.
The authors examined the cohort of all defendants pleading not guilty by reason of insanity over a 12-month period in Baltimore City's superior trial court. During that time, 143 of the 11,497 defendants indicted (1.2%) pled not criminally responsible. Fourteen of those defendants (10%) were subsequently found not guilty by reason of insanity. The authors found marked agreement between the prosecution and defense with only two cases leading to full trials where the issue of insanity was argued. The evaluating physician's opinion as to criminal responsibility and Axis I diagnosis, and the most serious underlying charge discriminated between those defendants found not guilty by reason of insanity and those defendants found guilty or not guilty by the court. Other demographic factors such as age, number of dependents, educational level, severity of illness, and criminal background did not discriminate between the two groups.
作者对巴尔的摩市高等审判法院在12个月期间以精神错乱为由提出无罪抗辩的所有被告群体进行了研究。在此期间,11497名被起诉的被告中有143名(1.2%)提出无罪抗辩。其中14名被告(10%)随后被判定因精神错乱而无罪。作者发现控辩双方之间存在明显的一致性,只有两起案件进行了全面审判,其中对精神错乱问题进行了辩论。评估医生对刑事责任和轴I诊断的意见,以及最严重的潜在指控,区分了那些因精神错乱而被判定无罪的被告和那些被法院判定有罪或无罪的被告。其他人口统计学因素,如年龄、受抚养人数、教育水平、疾病严重程度和犯罪背景,在两组之间没有差异。