• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Alcohol taxes: do the poor pay more than the rich?

作者信息

Ashton T, Casswell S, Gilmore L

出版信息

Br J Addict. 1989 Jul;84(7):759-66. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.1989.tb03055.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1360-0443.1989.tb03055.x
PMID:2758149
Abstract

Concern has often been expressed that alcohol taxes bear more heavily on the poor than on the rich, especially if these taxes are based on quantity rather than price. However, surprisingly little is known about how the tax burden is distributed across different income groups. Utilizing survey data from 3010 respondents in New Zealand, this study calculates exactly how much alcohol tax was paid by respondents in different income groups and in different types of households. These results were applied to household expenditure survey data to estimate the incidence of alcohol taxes across different households. The results suggest that, although in dollar terms the wealthiest households paid about four times as much alcohol tax as the poorest households, when expressed as a percentage of income, alcohol taxes are distributed proportionally across the lower income brackets but decline towards the upper end of the income scale. These taxes accounted for less than 1% of household income for all income groups. Households with children generally paid less alcohol tax than households without children. It is concluded that alcohol taxes in New Zealand do not seriously conflict with the broader equity objectives of government policy.

摘要

相似文献

1
Alcohol taxes: do the poor pay more than the rich?
Br J Addict. 1989 Jul;84(7):759-66. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.1989.tb03055.x.
2
Alcohol policy and taxation in South Africa: an examination of the economic burden of alcohol tax.南非的酒精政策和税收:酒精税经济负担的考察。
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2012 Jan 1;10(1):65-76. doi: 10.2165/11594860-000000000-00000.
3
Are lower income smokers more price sensitive?: the evidence from Korean cigarette tax increases.低收入吸烟者对价格更敏感吗?:来自韩国香烟税上调的证据。
Tob Control. 2016 Mar;25(2):141-6. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2014-051680. Epub 2014 Nov 27.
4
US state cigarette tax increases and smoke-free legislation in relation to cigarette expenditure across household socio-economic circumstances: a quasi-experimental study.美国各州提高香烟税和无烟立法对家庭社会经济环境下香烟支出的影响:一项准实验研究。
Addiction. 2019 Apr;114(4):721-729. doi: 10.1111/add.14505. Epub 2018 Dec 18.
5
Poor smokers, poor quitters, and cigarette tax regressivity.贫困吸烟者、戒烟困难者与卷烟税的累退性
Am J Public Health. 2004 Feb;94(2):225-9. doi: 10.2105/ajph.94.2.225.
6
After-tax money income estimates of households: 1984.家庭税后货币收入估计:1984年。
Curr Popul Rep Popul Charact. 1986 Jul(147):i-1-51.
7
Equity in household spending on alcoholic beverages in South Africa: assessing changes between 1995 and 2011.南非家庭在酒类消费上的公平性:评估 1995 年至 2011 年之间的变化。
Int J Equity Health. 2019 May 28;18(1):78. doi: 10.1186/s12939-019-0985-3.
8
After-tax money income estimates of households: 1983.家庭税后货币收入估算:1983年。
Curr Popul Rep Popul Charact. 1985 Jun(143):1-53.
9
Taxes on tobacco, alcohol and sugar sweetened beverages: Linkages and lessons learned.对烟草、酒精和含糖饮料征税:联系与经验教训。
Soc Sci Med. 2015 Jul;136-137:175-9. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.05.022. Epub 2015 May 14.
10
Are Alcohol Taxation and Pricing Policies Regressive? Product-Level Effects of a Specific Tax and a Minimum Unit Price for Alcohol.酒精税和定价政策是否具有累退性?酒精从量税和最低单位价格的产品层面影响。
Alcohol Alcohol. 2016 Jul;51(4):493-502. doi: 10.1093/alcalc/agv133. Epub 2015 Dec 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Equity in household spending on alcoholic beverages in South Africa: assessing changes between 1995 and 2011.南非家庭在酒类消费上的公平性:评估 1995 年至 2011 年之间的变化。
Int J Equity Health. 2019 May 28;18(1):78. doi: 10.1186/s12939-019-0985-3.