• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

临床肿瘤-淋巴结-转移分期对接受手术治疗的胃癌患者生存的影响。

Impact of clinical tumor-node-metastasis staging on survival in gastric carcinoma patients receiving surgery.

机构信息

Division of Gastric Surgery, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Shimonagakubo 1007, Nagaizumichou, Suntougun, Shizuoka, 411-0934, Japan.

出版信息

Gastric Cancer. 2017 May;20(3):448-456. doi: 10.1007/s10120-016-0637-x. Epub 2016 Sep 1.

DOI:10.1007/s10120-016-0637-x
PMID:27586236
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Preoperative clinical staging of gastric cancer is used to determine therapeutic strategies. However, the impact of the clinical stage on survival has not been completely investigated, although the relationship between pathologic staging and survival outcome has been reported. The aim of the present study was to clarify the predictability of patient survival based on clinical staging and to evaluate the usefulness of staging as an indicator for selecting the treatment modality.

METHODS

A total of 3033 patients who underwent surgery for gastric cancer were included. A survival analysis was conducted based on the seventh edition of the tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) clinical staging system of the American Joint Committee on Cancer. The predictive ability of the TNM clinical stage for survival was evaluated by Harrell's C-index, a measure of the separation of survival distributions.

RESULTS

The cumulative 5-year survival rates according to the clinical stage were 94.3 % (IA), 84.7 % (IB), 71.7 % (IIA), 56.1 % (IIB), 55.7 % (IIIA), 42.3 % (IIIB), 22.8 % (IIIC), and 9.1 % (IV). Although no significant difference was observed between clinical stages IIB and IIIA (p = 0.865), significant differences existed between all other clinical stages (p < 0.001). Harrell's C-index applied to these results was 0.825 (95 % confidence interval 0.819-0.831).

CONCLUSIONS

The seventh edition of the TNM clinical staging system has a strong prognostic ability with a satisfactory C-index and should be considered valuable for selecting therapeutic strategies for the treatment of gastric cancer.

摘要

背景

胃癌的术前临床分期用于确定治疗策略。然而,尽管已经报道了病理分期与生存结果之间的关系,但临床分期对生存的影响尚未完全研究。本研究旨在阐明基于临床分期预测患者生存的能力,并评估分期作为选择治疗方式的指标的有用性。

方法

共纳入 3033 例接受胃癌手术的患者。根据美国癌症联合委员会的第七版肿瘤-淋巴结-转移(TNM)临床分期系统进行生存分析。通过 Harrell 的 C 指数评估 TNM 临床分期对生存的预测能力,该指数用于衡量生存分布的分离情况。

结果

根据临床分期,患者的 5 年累积生存率分别为 94.3%(IA)、84.7%(IB)、71.7%(IIA)、56.1%(IIB)、55.7%(IIIA)、42.3%(IIIB)、22.8%(IIIC)和 9.1%(IV)。尽管临床分期 IIB 和 IIIA 之间无显著差异(p=0.865),但所有其他临床分期之间均存在显著差异(p<0.001)。应用于这些结果的 Harrell 的 C 指数为 0.825(95%置信区间 0.819-0.831)。

结论

第七版 TNM 临床分期系统具有较强的预后能力,C 指数令人满意,应被认为对选择治疗胃癌的治疗策略有价值。

相似文献

1
Impact of clinical tumor-node-metastasis staging on survival in gastric carcinoma patients receiving surgery.临床肿瘤-淋巴结-转移分期对接受手术治疗的胃癌患者生存的影响。
Gastric Cancer. 2017 May;20(3):448-456. doi: 10.1007/s10120-016-0637-x. Epub 2016 Sep 1.
2
Comparison of staging between the old (6th edition) and new (7th edition) TNM classifications in advanced gastric cancer.比较新旧(第 6 版和第 7 版)TNM 分类在晚期胃癌中的分期。
Anticancer Res. 2011 Jun;31(6):2361-5.
3
Validation of the prognostic impact of the new tumor-node-metastasis clinical staging in patients with gastric cancer.验证新的胃癌肿瘤-淋巴结-转移临床分期对患者预后的影响。
Gastric Cancer. 2019 Jan;22(1):123-129. doi: 10.1007/s10120-018-0799-9. Epub 2018 Jan 22.
4
Comparison of the staging of regional lymph nodes using the sixth and seventh editions of the tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) classification system for the evaluation of overall survival in gastric cancer patients: findings of a case-control analysis involving a single institution in China.比较第六版和第七版肿瘤-淋巴结-转移(TNM)分期系统在评估胃癌患者总生存期中区域淋巴结分期的作用:中国单中心病例对照研究结果。
Surgery. 2014 Jul;156(1):64-74. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2014.03.020. Epub 2014 Mar 16.
5
Evaluation of the seventh edition of American Joint Committee on Cancer TNM staging system for gastric cancer: results from a Chinese monoinstitutional study.评估第七版美国癌症联合委员会胃癌 TNM 分期系统:来自中国单机构研究的结果。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2012 Jun;19(6):1918-27. doi: 10.1245/s10434-011-2206-1. Epub 2012 Jan 13.
6
Validation of seventh edition AJCC gastric cancer staging modifications.第七版 AJCC 胃癌分期修改的验证。
J Surg Oncol. 2012 Jan;105(1):26-30. doi: 10.1002/jso.22026. Epub 2011 Jul 14.
7
Prognostic value of the 2002 TNM classification for breast carcinoma with regard to the number of metastatic axillary lymph nodes.2002年TNM分类对伴有腋窝淋巴结转移数目之乳腺癌的预后价值。
Cancer. 2005 Aug 15;104(4):700-7. doi: 10.1002/cncr.21199.
8
A comparison between the seventh and sixth editions of the American Joint Committee on Cancer/International Union Against classification of gastric cancer.第七版与第六版美国癌症联合委员会/国际抗癌联盟胃癌分类的比较。
Ann Surg. 2013 Jan;257(1):81-6. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31825eff3f.
9
Prognostic Performance of Different Lymph Node Staging Systems After Curative Intent Resection for Gastric Adenocarcinoma.胃腺癌根治性切除术后不同淋巴结分期系统的预后性能
Ann Surg. 2015 Dec;262(6):991-8. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001040.
10
The 8th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer tumor-node-metastasis staging system for gastric cancer is superior to the 7th edition: results from a Chinese mono-institutional study of 1663 patients.第八版美国癌症联合委员会胃癌肿瘤-淋巴结-转移分期系统优于第七版:来自中国单机构 1663 例患者的研究结果。
Gastric Cancer. 2018 Jul;21(4):643-652. doi: 10.1007/s10120-017-0779-5. Epub 2017 Nov 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of enhanced-CT and double contrast-enhanced ultrasound for preoperative T-staging of gastric cancer: a meta-analysis.增强CT与双对比增强超声对胃癌术前T分期诊断准确性的比较:一项荟萃分析
Cancer Imaging. 2025 Apr 3;25(1):48. doi: 10.1186/s40644-025-00861-5.
2
Added value of pretreatment CT-based Node-RADS score for predicting survival outcome of locally advanced gastric cancer: compared with clinical N stage.基于CT的治疗前淋巴结影像报告和数据系统(Node-RADS)评分对预测局部进展期胃癌生存结局的附加价值:与临床N分期比较
BMC Cancer. 2025 Apr 2;25(1):598. doi: 10.1186/s12885-025-14032-z.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Gastric cancer: ESMO-ESSO-ESTRO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up.胃癌:欧洲肿瘤内科学会(ESMO)、欧洲外科肿瘤学会(ESSO)和欧洲放射肿瘤学会(ESTRO)诊断、治疗及随访临床实践指南
Ann Oncol. 2013 Oct;24 Suppl 6:vi57-63. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdt344.
2
Validation of the seventh edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer TNM staging system for gastric cancer.第七版美国癌症联合委员会胃癌 TNM 分期系统的验证。
Cancer. 2011 Jun 1;117(11):2371-8. doi: 10.1002/cncr.25778. Epub 2011 Jan 11.
3
Long-term outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer: a retrospective comparison with conventional endoscopic resection in a single center.
Perioperative chemotherapy with nivolumab for HER2-negative locally advanced gastric cancer: a case series.
纳武单抗用于HER2阴性局部晚期胃癌的围手术期化疗:病例系列
Surg Case Rep. 2024 Aug 28;10(1):200. doi: 10.1186/s40792-024-02001-w.
4
Radiomics based on machine learning algorithms could predict prognosis and postoperative chemotherapy benefits of patients with gastric cancer: a retrospective cohort study.基于机器学习算法的放射组学可预测胃癌患者的预后及术后化疗获益:一项回顾性队列研究
J Gastrointest Oncol. 2023 Oct 31;14(5):2048-2063. doi: 10.21037/jgo-23-627. Epub 2023 Oct 27.
5
Surgeon-Pathologist Team Approach Dramatically Affects Lymph Nodes Detection and Improves Patients' Short-Term Outcome.外科医生-病理学家团队协作方式显著影响淋巴结检测并改善患者短期预后。
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Feb 18;14(4):1034. doi: 10.3390/cancers14041034.
6
Development and validation of pretreatment nomogram for disease-specific mortality in gastric cancer-A competing risk analysis.胃癌疾病特异性死亡率的预处理列线图的开发和验证:竞争风险分析。
Cancer Med. 2021 Nov;10(21):7561-7571. doi: 10.1002/cam4.4279. Epub 2021 Oct 10.
7
Preoperative Splenic Density for the Prediction of Survival and Adjuvant Chemotherapy Benefits in Gastric Cancer.术前脾脏密度对胃癌生存及辅助化疗获益的预测作用
J Cancer. 2020 Aug 25;11(20):6133-6139. doi: 10.7150/jca.47559. eCollection 2020.
8
Development and validation of a pretreatment nomogram to predict overall survival in gastric cancer.建立并验证一个预测胃癌患者总生存期的术前列线图。
Cancer Med. 2020 Aug;9(16):5708-5718. doi: 10.1002/cam4.3225. Epub 2020 Jun 26.
9
Impact of preoperative wait time on survival in patients with clinical stage II/III gastric cancer.术前等待时间对临床 II/III 期胃癌患者生存的影响。
Gastric Cancer. 2019 Jul;22(4):864-872. doi: 10.1007/s10120-018-00910-y. Epub 2018 Dec 10.
10
Prognostic value of computed tomography radiomics features in patients with gastric cancer following curative resection.胃癌根治术后 CT 影像组学特征对患者预后的预测价值。
Eur Radiol. 2019 Jun;29(6):3079-3089. doi: 10.1007/s00330-018-5861-9. Epub 2018 Dec 5.
内镜黏膜下剥离术治疗早期胃癌的长期疗效:单中心回顾性比较与传统内镜切除。
Gastric Cancer. 2014 Jan;17(1):130-6. doi: 10.1007/s10120-013-0241-2. Epub 2013 Apr 11.
4
Gastroenteric neuroendocrine neoplasms classification: comparison of prognostic models.胃肠神经内分泌肿瘤的分类:预后模型的比较。
Cancer. 2013 Jan 1;119(1):36-44. doi: 10.1002/cncr.27716. Epub 2012 Jun 28.
5
Optimal colorectal cancer staging criteria in TNM classification.最优结直肠癌 TNM 分期标准。
J Clin Oncol. 2012 May 1;30(13):1519-26. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.39.4692. Epub 2012 Mar 19.
6
Comparison of a lymph node ratio-based staging system with the 7th AJCC system for gastric cancer: analysis of 18,043 patients from the SEER database.基于淋巴结比率的分期系统与第 7 版 AJCC 系统在胃癌中的比较:来自 SEER 数据库的 18043 例患者的分析。
Ann Surg. 2012 Mar;255(3):478-85. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31824857e2.
7
Prognostic value of the 7th AJCC/UICC TNM classification of noncardia gastric cancer: analysis of a large series from specialized Western centers.第 7 版 AJCC/UICC 非贲门胃癌 TNM 分类的预后价值:来自专业西方中心的大型系列分析。
Ann Surg. 2012 Mar;255(3):486-91. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182389b1a.
8
Japanese classification of gastric carcinoma: 3rd English edition.日本胃癌分类:第3版英文版
Gastric Cancer. 2011 Jun;14(2):101-12. doi: 10.1007/s10120-011-0041-5.
9
Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines 2010 (ver. 3).《日本胃癌治疗指南2010(第3版)》
Gastric Cancer. 2011 Jun;14(2):113-23. doi: 10.1007/s10120-011-0042-4.
10
Depth-predicting score for differentiated early gastric cancer.分化型早期胃癌的深度预测评分。
Gastric Cancer. 2011 Mar;14(1):35-40. doi: 10.1007/s10120-011-0002-z. Epub 2011 Feb 17.