Jones Kevin C, Vander Stappen François, Sehgal Chandra M, Avery Stephen
Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104.
Ion Beam Applications SA, Louvain-la-Neuve 1348, Belgium.
Med Phys. 2016 Sep;43(9):5213. doi: 10.1118/1.4961120.
Measurement of the arrival times of thermoacoustic waves induced by pulsed proton dose depositions (protoacoustics) may provide a proton range verification method. The goal of this study is to characterize the required dose and protoacoustic proton range (distance) verification accuracy in a homogeneous water medium at a hospital-based clinical cyclotron.
Gaussian-like proton pulses with 17 μs widths and instantaneous currents of 480 nA (5.6 × 10(7) protons/pulse, 3.4 cGy/pulse at the Bragg peak) were generated by modulating the cyclotron proton source with a function generator. After energy degradation, the 190 MeV proton pulses irradiated a water phantom, and the generated protoacoustic emissions were measured by a hydrophone. The detector position and proton pulse characteristics were varied. The experimental results were compared to simulations. Different arrival time metrics derived from acoustic waveforms were compared, and the accuracy of protoacoustic time-of-flight distance calculations was assessed.
A 27 mPa noise level was observed in the treatment room during irradiation. At 5 cm from the proton beam, an average maximum pressure of 5.2 mPa/1 × 10(7) protons (6.1 mGy at the Bragg peak) was measured after irradiation with a proton pulse with 10%-90% rise time of 11 μs. Simulation and experiment arrival times agreed well, and the observed 2.4 μs delay between simulation and experiment is attributed to the difference between the hydrophone's acoustic and geometric centers. Based on protoacoustic arrival times, the beam axis position was measured to within (x, y) = (-2.0, 0.5) ± 1 mm. After deconvolution of the exciting proton pulse, the protoacoustic compression peak provided the most consistent measure of the distance to the Bragg peak, with an error distribution with mean = - 4.5 mm and standard deviation = 2.0 mm.
Based on water tank measurements at a clinical hospital-based cyclotron, protoacoustics is a potential method for measuring the beam's position (x and y within 2.0 mm) and Bragg peak range (2.0 mm standard deviation), although range verification will require simulation or experimental calibration to remove systematic error. Based on extrapolation, a protoacoustic arrival time reproducibility of 1.5 μs (2.2 mm) is achievable with 2 Gy of total deposited dose. Of the compared methods, deconvolution of the excitation proton pulse is the best technique for extracting protoacoustic arrival times, particularly if there is variation in the proton pulse shape.
测量由脉冲质子剂量沉积引发的热声波(质子声学)的到达时间,可能会提供一种质子射程验证方法。本研究的目的是在医院临床回旋加速器的均匀水介质中,确定所需的剂量以及质子声学质子射程(距离)验证的准确性。
通过用函数发生器调制回旋加速器质子源,产生宽度为17 μs、瞬时电流为480 nA(5.6×10⁷个质子/脉冲,在布拉格峰处为3.4 cGy/脉冲)的类高斯质子脉冲。能量降解后,190 MeV的质子脉冲照射水模体,并用一个水听器测量产生的质子声学发射。探测器位置和质子脉冲特性会发生变化。将实验结果与模拟结果进行比较。比较从声学波形得出的不同到达时间指标,并评估质子声飞行时间距离计算的准确性。
在照射期间,在治疗室观察到27 mPa的噪声水平。在距质子束5 cm处,用10%-90%上升时间为11 μs的质子脉冲照射后,测量到平均最大压力为5.2 mPa/1×10⁷个质子(在布拉格峰处为6.1 mGy)。模拟和实验的到达时间吻合良好,模拟和实验之间观察到的2.4 μs延迟归因于水听器的声学中心和几何中心之间的差异。基于质子声学到达时间,测量到束轴位置在(x, y) = (-2.0, 0.5) ± 1 mm范围内。对激发质子脉冲进行去卷积后,质子声学压缩峰提供了到布拉格峰距离的最一致测量,误差分布的均值为-4.5 mm,标准差为2.0 mm。
基于在医院临床回旋加速器的水箱测量,质子声学是一种测量束位置(x和y在2.0 mm以内)和布拉格峰射程(标准差为2.0 mm)的潜在方法,不过射程验证将需要模拟或实验校准以消除系统误差。基于外推法,总沉积剂量为2 Gy时,质子声学到达时间的可重复性可达1.5 μs(2.2 mm)。在所比较的方法中,激发质子脉冲的去卷积是提取质子声学到达时间的最佳技术,特别是在质子脉冲形状存在变化的情况下。