Suppr超能文献

来自在Tempus管中稳定保存并存储于大型人类生物样本库的样本的血液RNA分离方法比较。

Comparison of blood RNA isolation methods from samples stabilized in Tempus tubes and stored at a large human biobank.

作者信息

Aarem Jeanette, Brunborg Gunnar, Aas Kaja K, Harbak Kari, Taipale Miia M, Magnus Per, Knudsen Gun Peggy, Duale Nur

机构信息

Norwegian Institute of Public Health, P.O Box 4404, 0403, Nydalen, Oslo, Norway.

Institute for Energy Technology, Kjeller, Norway.

出版信息

BMC Res Notes. 2016 Sep 1;9(1):430. doi: 10.1186/s13104-016-2224-y.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

More than 50,000 adult and cord blood samples were collected in Tempus tubes and stored at the Norwegian Institute of Public Health Biobank for future use. In this study, we systematically evaluated and compared five blood-RNA isolation protocols: three blood-RNA isolation protocols optimized for simultaneous isolation of all blood-RNA species (MagMAX RNA Isolation Kit, both manual and semi-automated protocols; and Norgen Preserved Blood RNA kit I); and two protocols optimized for large RNAs only (Tempus Spin RNA, and Tempus 6-port isolation kit). We estimated the following parameters: RNA quality, RNA yield, processing time, cost per sample, and RNA transcript stability of six selected mRNAs and 13 miRNAs using real-time qPCR.

FINDINGS

Whole blood samples from adults (n = 59 tubes) and umbilical cord blood (n = 18 tubes) samples collected in Tempus tubes were analyzed. High-quality blood-RNAs with average RIN-values above seven were extracted using all five RNA isolation protocols. The transcript levels of the six selected genes showed minimal variation between the five protocols. Unexplained differences within the transcript levels of the 13 miRNA were observed; however, the 13 miRNAs had similar expression direction and they were within the same order of magnitude. Some differences in the RNA processing time and cost were noted.

CONCLUSIONS

Sufficient amounts of high-quality RNA were obtained using all five protocols, and the Tempus blood RNA system therefore seems not to be dependent on one specific RNA isolation method.

摘要

背景

超过50000份成人和脐带血样本采集于Tempus管中,并存储在挪威公共卫生生物样本库以备将来使用。在本研究中,我们系统地评估并比较了五种血液RNA提取方案:三种为同时提取所有血液RNA种类而优化的血液RNA提取方案(MagMAX RNA提取试剂盒,包括手动和半自动方案;以及Norgen Preserved Blood RNA试剂盒I);以及两种仅针对大RNA优化的方案(Tempus Spin RNA和Tempus 6端口提取试剂盒)。我们使用实时定量PCR估计了以下参数:RNA质量、RNA产量、处理时间、每个样本的成本以及六种选定mRNA和13种miRNA的RNA转录本稳定性。

研究结果

分析了采集于Tempus管中的成人全血样本(n = 59管)和脐带血样本(n = 18管)。使用所有五种RNA提取方案均提取出了平均RIN值高于7的高质量血液RNA。六种选定基因的转录水平在五种方案之间显示出最小的差异。在13种miRNA的转录水平中观察到无法解释的差异;然而,这13种miRNA具有相似的表达方向,且它们处于相同的数量级。在RNA处理时间和成本方面存在一些差异。

结论

使用所有五种方案均获得了足够量的高质量RNA,因此Tempus血液RNA系统似乎不依赖于一种特定的RNA提取方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/101f/5009671/c2d3142ad7b9/13104_2016_2224_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验