Shen Cheng-Che, Hu Li-Yu, Tsai Shih-Jen, Yang Albert C, Chen Pan-Ming, Hu Ya-Han
Department of Information Management and Institute of Healthcare Information Management, National Chung Cheng University, Chiayi, Taiwan.
Department of Psychiatry, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Chiayi, Taiwan.
Early Interv Psychiatry. 2018 Aug;12(4):605-612. doi: 10.1111/eip.12364. Epub 2016 Sep 1.
To develop a risk stratification model for the early diagnosis of borderline personality disorder (BPD) using Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database.
We conducted a retrospective case-control study of 6132 patients (292 BPD patients and 5840 control subjects) who were selected from the National Health Insurance Research Database. Psychiatric co-morbidities including depressive disorder, bipolar disorder, anxiety disorder, substance-use disorder, personality disorders other than BPD, sleep disorder, eating disorder, autistic spectrum disorder, mental retardation and attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder, which were diagnosed within 3 years before enrolment, were collected. A logistic regression was used to calculate the odds ratio of psychiatric co-morbidities between subjects with and without BPD. The classification and regression tree method was used to generate a risk stratification model.
The odds ratios for depressive disorder, bipolar disorder, anxiety disorder, substance-use disorder, personality disorders other than BPD, sleep disorder, eating disorder, mental retardation and attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder were greater for BPD patients than for the control subjects. Furthermore, the risk of BPD can be reliably estimated using age and psychiatric co-morbidities including bipolar disorder, substance-use disorder and depressive disorder.
Most psychiatric disorders were more common in BPD patients than in the control subjects. Using psychiatric co-morbidities, we identified four variables as significant risk predictors of BPD and permitted identification of subjects with low, intermediate or high risk for BPD. The accuracy of the risk stratification model is high and can be easily applied in clinical practice.
利用台湾全民健康保险研究数据库开发一种用于边缘性人格障碍(BPD)早期诊断的风险分层模型。
我们对从全民健康保险研究数据库中选取的6132名患者(292名BPD患者和5840名对照对象)进行了一项回顾性病例对照研究。收集了在入组前3年内诊断出的精神共病,包括抑郁症、双相情感障碍、焦虑症、物质使用障碍、除BPD外的人格障碍、睡眠障碍、进食障碍、自闭症谱系障碍、智力障碍和注意力缺陷多动障碍。使用逻辑回归计算有和没有BPD的受试者之间精神共病的优势比。采用分类与回归树方法生成风险分层模型。
BPD患者患抑郁症、双相情感障碍、焦虑症、物质使用障碍、除BPD外的人格障碍、睡眠障碍、进食障碍、智力障碍和注意力缺陷多动障碍的优势比高于对照对象。此外,可使用年龄和包括双相情感障碍、物质使用障碍和抑郁症在内的精神共病可靠地估计BPD风险。
大多数精神障碍在BPD患者中比在对照对象中更常见。通过精神共病,我们确定了四个变量作为BPD的显著风险预测因素,并能够识别BPD低、中或高风险的受试者。风险分层模型的准确性高,且可轻松应用于临床实践。