Nelson L J, Miller P K, Ashman D
Department of Nursing, Health and Professional Practice, University of Cumbria, Carlisle, UK.
Department of Medical and Sports Sciences, University of Cumbria, Lancaster, UK.
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2016 Aug;23(6-7):438-48. doi: 10.1111/jpm.12328.
WHAT IS KNOWN ABOUT THE SUBJECT?: This paper describes crisis resolution/home treatment (CRHT) teams, which are part of mental health services in the United Kingdom. CRHT is expected to assist individuals in building resilience and work within a recovery approach. WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS TO EXISTING KNOWLEDGE?: This paper arises from an interview with one individual, Dale, as part of a larger study exploring service users' experiences of CRHT. It adds to the body of narrative knowledge in CRHT through Dale's co-authorship of this paper, reflecting on his original interview 4 years later, with co-authors providing critical interpretation of his experience, in turn supported by cognate literature. WHAT ARE THE IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE?: Implications for practice are considered, themselves mediated through Dale's own descriptions of how CRHT interventions impacted upon him. These impacts are analysed with respect to three themes: Resilience, Recovery and Power. It is centrally contended that clinicians need to more clearly comprehend three core matters. First, what resilience 'is' for service users as well as the complex process through which these individuals move in developing resilience. Second, the distinction that service users might make between 'recovery' and 'functionality', and how this in turn can impact on individuals both in personal and socioeconomic sense. Finally, the mechanics of power within CRHT contexts and how these interpersonal dynamics can affect the relationship between service user and clinician in practice.
Introduction and Aim The central purpose of this paper, part of a larger study exploring the experiences of Service Users (SUs) with CRHT, is to emphasise the importance of the SU voice itself within the domain. Following an interrogation of the historical contexts of CRHT. Method This paper uses interpretative phenomological approach around detailed thematic examination of an extended, semi-structured with a single SU: Dale. Moreover, four years after the interview was originally conducted, Dale was himself invited to reflect upon, and critically re-evaluate, his initial participation as a co-author of this paper. In this way, a genuinely participant-centred narrative on experiences with CRHT could be generated. Implications for Practice This resulted in Dale describing what 'crisis' meant to him, and his personal journey within that crisis. Although framing some experiences as negative, he primarily argues that the CRHT team was very personable, affirming his personal values and beliefs, and encouraging him to use coping skills that he had utilised effectively in prior periods of crisis. Analysis highlights three major themes permeating Dale's narrative: Resilience, Recovery and Power. It is contended that this analysis begins to demonstrate implications for practice and highlight that (and how) CRHT clinicians might more clearly engage with what resilience 'is' for SUs, and also the complex process through which these individuals move in developing it. Equally, it is proposed that practitioners should be mindful of the distinction that SUs might make between 'recovery' and 'functionality', and how this in turn can impact on individuals both in personal and socio-economic sense. Finally, the mechanics of power within CRHT contexts are foregrounded, and how these interpersonal dynamics can affect the working relationship between SU and clinician.
关于该主题已知的信息有哪些?本文介绍了危机解决/家庭治疗(CRHT)团队,这是英国心理健康服务的一部分。CRHT旨在帮助个人增强恢复力,并以康复为导向开展工作。本文对现有知识的补充:本文源自对戴尔(Dale)的一次访谈,该访谈是一项探索服务使用者对CRHT体验的更大规模研究的一部分。通过戴尔作为本文共同作者,反思其4年前的原始访谈,并由共同作者对其经历进行批判性解读,同时得到相关文献的支持,本文丰富了CRHT的叙事知识体系。对实践的启示:考虑了对实践的启示,这些启示通过戴尔本人对CRHT干预如何影响他的描述来传递。从三个主题对这些影响进行了分析:恢复力、康复和权力。核心观点是临床医生需要更清楚地理解三个核心问题。第一,服务使用者的恢复力“是什么”,以及这些人在培养恢复力过程中所经历的复杂过程。第二,服务使用者在“康复”和“功能”之间可能做出的区分,以及这如何在个人和社会经济层面影响个体。最后,CRHT背景下的权力机制,以及这些人际动态如何在实践中影响服务使用者与临床医生之间的关系。
引言与目的 本文是一项探索服务使用者对CRHT体验的更大规模研究的一部分,其核心目的是强调服务使用者的声音在该领域的重要性。在审视了CRHT的历史背景之后。方法 本文采用解释现象学方法,围绕对一位服务使用者戴尔进行的详细主题研究展开,该研究采用了扩展的半结构化访谈。此外,在最初访谈进行四年后,邀请戴尔本人反思并批判性地重新评估他作为本文共同作者的最初参与情况。通过这种方式,可以生成一个真正以参与者为中心的关于CRHT体验的叙述。对实践的启示 这使得戴尔描述了“危机”对他意味着什么,以及他在那场危机中的个人历程。尽管他将一些经历描述为负面的,但他主要认为CRHT团队非常亲切,肯定了他的个人价值观和信念,并鼓励他运用在之前危机时期有效使用过的应对技巧。分析突出了贯穿戴尔叙述的三个主要主题:恢复力、康复和权力。有人认为,这种分析开始展示对实践的启示,并强调CRHT临床医生如何能够更清楚地理解服务使用者的恢复力“是什么”,以及这些人在培养恢复力过程中所经历的复杂过程。同样,有人建议从业者应该注意服务使用者在“康复”和“功能”之间可能做出的区分,以及这如何在个人和社会经济层面影响个体。最后,突出了CRHT背景下的权力机制,以及这些人际动态如何影响服务使用者与临床医生之间的工作关系。