Pham-Duy T, Becker H U, Wollensak J, Wiemer C
Fortschr Ophthalmol. 1989;86(3):210-3.
We used Grant's tonography and fluorophotometry (the Jones and Maurice method) to study the aqueous humor dynamics in normal and glaucomatous eyes. The results of the two methods were compared. The mean facility and rate of aqueous flow in normal eyes were similar. In glaucomatous eyes the tonographic outflow facility (C-value) varied greatly, and the calculated rate of aqueous flow (F-value) also had a large standard deviation. To study the inflow rate, fluorophotometry is a more accurate method. Further calculation of uveoscleral flow and the "pseudofacility" from the tonographic F-value and fluorophotometric C-value was therefore of only limited accuracy.
我们使用格兰特眼压描记法和荧光光度法（琼斯和莫里斯方法）来研究正常眼和青光眼眼中的房水动力学。对这两种方法的结果进行了比较。正常眼中房水流出系数和流速的平均值相似。在青光眼眼中，眼压描记法的流出系数（C值）变化很大，计算得出的房水流速（F值）也有很大的标准差。为了研究房水流入速率，荧光光度法是一种更准确的方法。因此，根据眼压描记法的F值和荧光光度法的C值进一步计算葡萄膜巩膜途径房水流出量和“假性流出系数”，其准确性有限。
