Suppr超能文献

左心室辅助装置患者出院时开具的心力衰竭药物。

Heart failure medications prescribed at discharge for patients with left ventricular assist devices.

作者信息

Shreibati Jacqueline Baras, Sheng Shubin, Fonarow Gregg C, DeVore Adam D, Yancy Clyde W, Bhatt Deepak L, Schulte Phillip, Peterson Eric D, Hernandez Adrian, Heidenreich Paul A

机构信息

Stanford University, Stanford, CA.

Duke University, Durham, NC.

出版信息

Am Heart J. 2016 Sep;179:99-106. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2016.06.011. Epub 2016 Jun 23.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Real-world use of traditional heart failure (HF) medications for patients with left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) is not well known.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective, observational analysis of 1,887 advanced HF patients with and without LVADs from 32 LVAD hospitals participating in the Get With The Guidelines-Heart Failure registry from January 2009 to March 2015. We examined HF medication prescription at discharge, temporal trends, and predictors of prescription among patients with an in-hospital (n = 258) or prior (n = 171) LVAD implant, and those with advanced HF but no LVAD, as defined by a left ventricular ejection fraction ≤25% and in-hospital receipt of intravenous inotropes or vasopressin receptor antagonists (n = 1,458).

RESULTS

For β-blocker and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin II receptor blockers (ACEI/ARB), discharge prescriptions were 58.9% and 53.5% for new LVAD patients, 53.8% and 42.9% for prior LVAD patients, and 73.4% and 63.2% for patients without LVAD support, respectively (both P < .0001). Aldosterone antagonist prescription quadrupled among LVAD patients during the study period (P < .0001), whereas ACEI/ARB use decreased nearly 20 percentage points (60.0% to 41.4%, P = .0003). In the multivariable analysis of LVAD patients, patient age was inversely associated with β-blocker, ACEI/ARB, and aldosterone antagonist prescription.

CONCLUSIONS

Traditional HF therapies were moderately prescribed at discharge to patients with LVADs and were more frequently prescribed to patients with advanced HF without LVAD support. Moderate prescription rates suggest clinical uncertainty in the use of antiadrenergic medication in this population. Further research is needed on the optimal medical regimen for patients with LVADs.

摘要

背景

左心室辅助装置(LVAD)患者使用传统心力衰竭(HF)药物的实际情况尚不清楚。

方法

我们对2009年1月至2015年3月期间参与“遵循心力衰竭指南”登记系统的32家LVAD医院的1887例晚期HF患者进行了回顾性观察分析,这些患者有或没有LVAD。我们检查了出院时HF药物的处方情况、时间趋势以及住院期间植入LVAD(n = 258)或既往植入LVAD(n = 171)的患者以及根据左心室射血分数≤25%和住院期间接受静脉注射正性肌力药物或血管加压素受体拮抗剂定义的晚期HF但无LVAD的患者(n = 1458)的处方预测因素。

结果

对于β受体阻滞剂和血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂/血管紧张素II受体阻滞剂(ACEI/ARB),新植入LVAD的患者出院处方率分别为58.9%和53.5%,既往植入LVAD的患者为53.8%和42.9%,无LVAD支持的患者为73.4%和63.2%(均P <.0001)。在研究期间,LVAD患者中醛固酮拮抗剂的处方量增加了四倍(P <.0001),而ACEI/ARB的使用减少了近20个百分点(从60.0%降至41.4%,P =.0003)。在LVAD患者的多变量分析中,患者年龄与β受体阻滞剂、ACEI/ARB和醛固酮拮抗剂的处方呈负相关。

结论

传统HF治疗在LVAD患者出院时的处方率适中,而在无LVAD支持的晚期HF患者中处方更频繁。适中的处方率表明该人群在使用抗肾上腺素能药物方面存在临床不确定性。需要对LVAD患者的最佳药物治疗方案进行进一步研究。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验