• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

设定高频率和低频率河流休闲使用者的偏好:他们有多大差异?

Setting Preferences of High and Low Use River Recreationists: How Different are They?

作者信息

Kainzinger Silvia, Arnberger Arne, Burns Robert C

机构信息

Institute of Landscape Development, Recreation and Conservation Planning, Department of Spatial, Landscape and Infrastructure Sciences, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna, Austria.

Recreation, Parks and Tourism Program, Division of Forestry and Natural Resources, West Virginia University, West Virginia, USA.

出版信息

Environ Manage. 2016 Nov;58(5):767-779. doi: 10.1007/s00267-016-0754-7. Epub 2016 Sep 6.

DOI:10.1007/s00267-016-0754-7
PMID:27600655
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5055903/
Abstract

Whitewater boaters often choose a river based on their preferences for attributes important for their trip experience. This study explored whether preferences and tradeoffs of whitewater boaters for social, resource, and managerial attributes of riverscapes differ among a high and a low use river in the United States by employing a stated choice approach. River trip scenarios were displayed using verbal descriptions and computer-generated photographs. Results indicate that use levels were more important for boaters on the low use river, whereas river difficulty and river access fee was of higher importance for the high use river boaters, who are more involved in this whitewater activity. Preferences for waiting times and trip length did not differ between the samples. Findings suggest that whitewater boaters of high and low use rivers have a different tradeoff behavior among river setting attributes, which has implications for river recreation management.

摘要

白水漂流爱好者通常会根据对旅行体验重要的属性偏好来选择河流。本研究采用陈述性选择方法,探讨了美国一条高使用率河流和一条低使用率河流上,白水漂流爱好者对河景的社会、资源和管理属性的偏好及权衡是否存在差异。河流旅行场景通过文字描述和计算机生成的照片呈现。结果表明,使用率对低使用率河流上的漂流者更为重要,而河流难度和河流通行费对高使用率河流上的漂流者更为重要,这些漂流者更多地参与这项白水活动。样本之间对等待时间和旅行长度的偏好没有差异。研究结果表明,高使用率和低使用率河流上的白水漂流爱好者在河流环境属性之间具有不同的权衡行为,这对河流休闲管理具有启示意义。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c90f/5055903/fc48baec9957/267_2016_754_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c90f/5055903/7648643d621f/267_2016_754_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c90f/5055903/c7d78e05ce74/267_2016_754_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c90f/5055903/fc48baec9957/267_2016_754_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c90f/5055903/7648643d621f/267_2016_754_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c90f/5055903/c7d78e05ce74/267_2016_754_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c90f/5055903/fc48baec9957/267_2016_754_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Setting Preferences of High and Low Use River Recreationists: How Different are They?设定高频率和低频率河流休闲使用者的偏好:他们有多大差异?
Environ Manage. 2016 Nov;58(5):767-779. doi: 10.1007/s00267-016-0754-7. Epub 2016 Sep 6.
2
An Examination of Whitewater Boaters' Place Attachment and Specialization in Four Different River Settings.白水漂流者在四个不同河流环境中的地方依附感和专业化研究。
Environ Manage. 2018 Nov;62(5):832-844. doi: 10.1007/s00267-018-1082-x. Epub 2018 Jul 21.
3
Three approaches to time valuation in recreation demand: a study of the Snake River recreation area in eastern Washington.三种娱乐需求时间价值评估方法:对华盛顿州东部蛇河娱乐区的研究。
J Environ Manage. 2012 Dec 15;112:321-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.08.017. Epub 2012 Sep 8.
4
A Path Model of Whitewater Boating Satisfaction on the Cheat River of West Virginia.
Environ Manage. 1998 Jan;22(1):109-17. doi: 10.1007/s002679900088.
5
Economic value of instream flow for non-commercial whitewater boating using recreation demand and contingent valuation methods.运用娱乐需求和条件价值评估方法评估非商业性白水漂流的河道内流量的经济价值。
Environ Manage. 2014 Mar;53(3):510-9. doi: 10.1007/s00267-014-0232-z. Epub 2014 Jan 19.
6
Assessing the success of invasive species prevention efforts at changing the behaviors of recreational boaters.评估入侵物种预防措施在改变休闲船民行为方面的成效。
J Environ Manage. 2016 Dec 15;184(Pt 2):210-218. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.09.083. Epub 2016 Oct 4.
7
Incorporating recreational users into marine protected area planning: a study of recreational boating in British Columbia, Canada.将休闲使用者纳入海洋保护区规划:以加拿大不列颠哥伦比亚省的休闲划船为例的研究。
Environ Manage. 2010 Aug;46(2):167-80. doi: 10.1007/s00267-010-9479-1. Epub 2010 Jun 12.
8
Identifying Societal Preferences for River Restoration in a Densely Populated Urban Environment: Evidence from a Discrete Choice Experiment in Central Brussels.确定人口密集的城市环境中河流修复的社会偏好:来自布鲁塞尔市中心离散选择实验的证据。
Environ Manage. 2017 Aug;60(2):263-279. doi: 10.1007/s00267-017-0885-5. Epub 2017 May 5.
9
Boater preferences for beach characteristics downstream from Glen Canyon Dam, Arizona.
J Environ Manage. 2003 Oct;69(2):201-11. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2003.08.001.
10
Degraded water quality influences microbial community composition and perception of health risks in the Chattooga River.水质恶化影响 Chattoga 河的微生物群落组成和健康风险感知。
DNA Cell Biol. 2010 Sep;29(9):509-17. doi: 10.1089/dna.2009.0988.

引用本文的文献

1
An Examination of Whitewater Boaters' Place Attachment and Specialization in Four Different River Settings.白水漂流者在四个不同河流环境中的地方依附感和专业化研究。
Environ Manage. 2018 Nov;62(5):832-844. doi: 10.1007/s00267-018-1082-x. Epub 2018 Jul 21.

本文引用的文献

1
Cultural influence on crowding norms in outdoor recreation: a comparative analysis of visitors to national parks in Turkey and the United States.文化对户外游憩拥挤规范的影响:土耳其和美国国家公园游客的比较分析。
Environ Manage. 2013 Aug;52(2):493-502. doi: 10.1007/s00267-013-0076-y. Epub 2013 May 18.
2
Boater preferences for beach characteristics downstream from Glen Canyon Dam, Arizona.
J Environ Manage. 2003 Oct;69(2):201-11. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2003.08.001.