McEvoy Mimi, Pollack Staci, Dyche Lawrence, Burton William
Department of Clinical Family and Social Medicine, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA.
Department of Pediatrics, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA;
Med Educ Online. 2016 Sep 2;21:31940. doi: 10.3402/meo.v21.31940. eCollection 2016.
Humanism is cultivated through reflection and self-awareness. We aimed to employ fourth-year medical students, recognized for their humanism, to facilitate reflective sessions for second-year medical students with the intention of positively influencing reflective process toward humanistic development.
METHODS/ANALYSIS: A total of 186 students were randomly assigned to one of three comparison arms: eight groups of eight students (64 students) were facilitated by a fourth-year student who was a Gold Humanism Honor Society member (GHHS); eight groups (64 students) by a volunteer non-GHHS student; and seven groups (58 students) were non-facilitated. Before sessions, second-year students set learning goals concerning interactions with patients; fourth-year students received training materials on facilitation. Groups met twice during their 10 clinical site visits. At the last session, students completed a reflective assignment on their goal progress. Comparative mixed method analyses were conducted among the three comparison arms on reflection (reflective score on in-session assignment) and session satisfaction (survey) in addition to a thematic analysis of responses on the in-session assignment.
We found significant differences among all three comparison arms on students' reflective scores (p=0.0003) and satisfaction (p=0.0001). T-tests comparing GHHS- and non-GHHS-facilitated groups showed significantly higher mean reflective scores for GHHS-facilitated groups (p=0.033); there were no differences on session satisfaction. Thematic analysis of students' reflections showed attempts at self-examination, but lacked depth in addressing emotions. There was a common focus on achieving comfort and confidence in clinical skills performance.
DISCUSSION/CONCLUSIONS: Near peers, recognized for their humanism, demonstrated significant influence in deepening medical students' reflections surrounding patient interactions or humanistic development. Overall, students preferred facilitated to non-facilitated peer feedback forums. This model holds promise for enhancing self-reflection in medical education, but needs further exploration to determine behavioral effects.
人文精神是通过反思和自我认知培养出来的。我们旨在让以人文精神著称的四年级医学生为二年级医学生组织反思活动,以期对人文发展的反思过程产生积极影响。
方法/分析:总共186名学生被随机分配到三个比较组之一:八组每组八名学生(64名学生)由一名获得金人文主义荣誉协会会员(GHHS)称号的四年级学生引导;八组(64名学生)由一名非GHHS志愿者学生引导;七组(58名学生)不设引导人员。在活动开始前,二年级学生设定了关于与患者互动的学习目标;四年级学生接受了引导方面的培训材料。各小组在10次临床实习期间会面两次。在最后一次活动中,学生们就他们的目标进展完成了一份反思作业。除了对活动期间作业的回答进行主题分析外,还对三个比较组在反思(活动期间作业的反思得分)和活动满意度(调查)方面进行了比较混合方法分析。
我们发现,在学生的反思得分(p = 0.0003)和满意度(p = 0.0001)方面,所有三个比较组之间存在显著差异。比较GHHS引导组和非GHHS引导组的t检验显示,GHHS引导组的平均反思得分显著更高(p = 0.033);在活动满意度方面没有差异。对学生反思的主题分析显示了自我审视的尝试,但在处理情感方面缺乏深度。共同的重点是在临床技能表现中实现舒适感和信心。
讨论/结论:以人文精神著称的近龄同伴在深化医学生对患者互动或人文发展的反思方面显示出显著影响。总体而言,学生们更喜欢有引导的同伴反馈论坛,而不是没有引导的。这种模式有望在医学教育中增强自我反思,但需要进一步探索以确定行为效果。