Suppr超能文献

医学生在普通科实习中在线讨论论坛上的反思学习是否可见?一项定性研究。

Is Reflective Learning Visible in Online Discussion Forums for Medical Students on General Practice Placements? A Qualitative Study.

机构信息

Department of General Practice and Primary Health Care, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.

出版信息

Teach Learn Med. 2020 Aug-Sep;32(4):434-441. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2020.1730184. Epub 2020 Mar 16.

Abstract

Reflection is important for lifelong learning and professional development, and discussion forums have been highlighted as a potential platform for enhancing reflection further through peer interaction and teacher feedback. Forums provide students on general practice (GP) placement the opportunity to engage in collaborative reflective learning despite their geographical isolation and disparate schedules. This case report seeks to explore whether online discussion forums demonstrate community presence and reflective learning among medical students on GP placement. Online discussion forums were introduced into the curriculum for University of Auckland Year 5 and 6 medical students on their respective 4- and 6-week GP placement. Via asynchronous posts and comments, groups of eight students on average presented cases and experiences for discussion with peers and an overseeing GP faculty member. Students were dispersed across a large geographical area and were unlikely to have peer contact in their assigned practices. Online discussion forums were implemented for a number of reasons, including facilitating reflective learning. An adapted community of inquiry framework was used to investigate the cognitive, social, and teacher presence elements visible in the discussion forum transcripts of unanimously consenting groups. Content analysis of the transcripts was performed to evaluate the presence and quality of reflective learning. The forums were predominately student-led with relatively scarce comments by GP faculty facilitators. The majority of cases and experiences presented related to clinical management of patients and dissonance triggered by the on-site supervisor's actions. Ideas, knowledge, and understanding of presented encounters were shared and built on by positive and supportive interaction, broadening students' perspectives and, at times, leading to the formation of solutions. However, students' reflection was mostly superficial. Deep reflection was rarely present, and affective dimensions of reflection were disclosed relatively less than clinical cognitive aspects of reflection. Direct instruction, based on prior experience and pedagogical expertise, was the main form of comment made by faculty facilitators, who prompted with questions to a far lesser extent. Online discussion forums appeared to enable medical students on GP placement to interact positively with peers and faculty facilitators. However, deep reflection was not reached. Modifying the discussion forums to facilitate more peer interaction and addressing the barriers that limit faculty facilitation may encourage deeper and more affective reflections.

摘要

反思对于终身学习和专业发展至关重要,讨论论坛已被强调为通过同伴互动和教师反馈进一步增强反思的潜在平台。论坛为全科医学实习的学生提供了机会,使他们能够在地理隔离和时间表不同的情况下进行协作式反思学习。本案例报告旨在探讨在线讨论论坛是否能在全科医学实习的医学生中体现社区存在和反思学习。

奥克兰大学五年级和六年级的医学生在各自的 4 到 6 周的全科医学实习中引入了在线讨论论坛。通过异步帖子和评论,平均每组 8 名学生向同行和监督全科医学教师展示病例和经验以供讨论。学生分布在很大的地理区域,在指定的实践中不太可能与同龄人接触。在线讨论论坛的实施有几个原因,包括促进反思学习。采用了适应性的教学研究共同体框架,以调查讨论论坛转录本中可见的认知、社会和教师存在要素。对转录本进行内容分析,以评估反思学习的存在和质量。

论坛主要由学生主导,全科医学教师 facilitators 的评论相对较少。提出的病例和经验主要涉及患者的临床管理以及现场主管行动引发的不和谐。通过积极的互动分享和建立想法、知识和对提出的遭遇的理解,拓宽了学生的视野,有时还导致解决方案的形成。然而,学生的反思大多是表面的。深度反思很少出现,情感维度的反思比临床认知方面的反思披露得相对较少。基于先前的经验和教学专业知识的直接指导是 faculty facilitators 主要的评论形式,他们很少提出问题。

在线讨论论坛似乎使全科医学实习的医学生能够与同伴和教师 facilitators 进行积极互动。然而,并未达到深度反思。修改讨论论坛以促进更多的同伴互动,并解决限制教师 facilitators 的障碍,可能会鼓励更深入和更具情感的反思。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验