• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医学生在普通科实习中在线讨论论坛上的反思学习是否可见?一项定性研究。

Is Reflective Learning Visible in Online Discussion Forums for Medical Students on General Practice Placements? A Qualitative Study.

机构信息

Department of General Practice and Primary Health Care, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.

出版信息

Teach Learn Med. 2020 Aug-Sep;32(4):434-441. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2020.1730184. Epub 2020 Mar 16.

DOI:10.1080/10401334.2020.1730184
PMID:32174178
Abstract

Reflection is important for lifelong learning and professional development, and discussion forums have been highlighted as a potential platform for enhancing reflection further through peer interaction and teacher feedback. Forums provide students on general practice (GP) placement the opportunity to engage in collaborative reflective learning despite their geographical isolation and disparate schedules. This case report seeks to explore whether online discussion forums demonstrate community presence and reflective learning among medical students on GP placement. Online discussion forums were introduced into the curriculum for University of Auckland Year 5 and 6 medical students on their respective 4- and 6-week GP placement. Via asynchronous posts and comments, groups of eight students on average presented cases and experiences for discussion with peers and an overseeing GP faculty member. Students were dispersed across a large geographical area and were unlikely to have peer contact in their assigned practices. Online discussion forums were implemented for a number of reasons, including facilitating reflective learning. An adapted community of inquiry framework was used to investigate the cognitive, social, and teacher presence elements visible in the discussion forum transcripts of unanimously consenting groups. Content analysis of the transcripts was performed to evaluate the presence and quality of reflective learning. The forums were predominately student-led with relatively scarce comments by GP faculty facilitators. The majority of cases and experiences presented related to clinical management of patients and dissonance triggered by the on-site supervisor's actions. Ideas, knowledge, and understanding of presented encounters were shared and built on by positive and supportive interaction, broadening students' perspectives and, at times, leading to the formation of solutions. However, students' reflection was mostly superficial. Deep reflection was rarely present, and affective dimensions of reflection were disclosed relatively less than clinical cognitive aspects of reflection. Direct instruction, based on prior experience and pedagogical expertise, was the main form of comment made by faculty facilitators, who prompted with questions to a far lesser extent. Online discussion forums appeared to enable medical students on GP placement to interact positively with peers and faculty facilitators. However, deep reflection was not reached. Modifying the discussion forums to facilitate more peer interaction and addressing the barriers that limit faculty facilitation may encourage deeper and more affective reflections.

摘要

反思对于终身学习和专业发展至关重要,讨论论坛已被强调为通过同伴互动和教师反馈进一步增强反思的潜在平台。论坛为全科医学实习的学生提供了机会,使他们能够在地理隔离和时间表不同的情况下进行协作式反思学习。本案例报告旨在探讨在线讨论论坛是否能在全科医学实习的医学生中体现社区存在和反思学习。

奥克兰大学五年级和六年级的医学生在各自的 4 到 6 周的全科医学实习中引入了在线讨论论坛。通过异步帖子和评论,平均每组 8 名学生向同行和监督全科医学教师展示病例和经验以供讨论。学生分布在很大的地理区域,在指定的实践中不太可能与同龄人接触。在线讨论论坛的实施有几个原因,包括促进反思学习。采用了适应性的教学研究共同体框架,以调查讨论论坛转录本中可见的认知、社会和教师存在要素。对转录本进行内容分析,以评估反思学习的存在和质量。

论坛主要由学生主导,全科医学教师 facilitators 的评论相对较少。提出的病例和经验主要涉及患者的临床管理以及现场主管行动引发的不和谐。通过积极的互动分享和建立想法、知识和对提出的遭遇的理解,拓宽了学生的视野,有时还导致解决方案的形成。然而,学生的反思大多是表面的。深度反思很少出现,情感维度的反思比临床认知方面的反思披露得相对较少。基于先前的经验和教学专业知识的直接指导是 faculty facilitators 主要的评论形式,他们很少提出问题。

在线讨论论坛似乎使全科医学实习的医学生能够与同伴和教师 facilitators 进行积极互动。然而,并未达到深度反思。修改讨论论坛以促进更多的同伴互动,并解决限制教师 facilitators 的障碍,可能会鼓励更深入和更具情感的反思。

相似文献

1
Is Reflective Learning Visible in Online Discussion Forums for Medical Students on General Practice Placements? A Qualitative Study.医学生在普通科实习中在线讨论论坛上的反思学习是否可见?一项定性研究。
Teach Learn Med. 2020 Aug-Sep;32(4):434-441. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2020.1730184. Epub 2020 Mar 16.
2
Near-peer role modeling: Can fourth-year medical students, recognized for their humanism, enhance reflection among second-year students in a physical diagnosis course?近龄榜样示范:以人文精神著称的四年级医学生能否增强二年级学生在物理诊断课程中的反思能力?
Med Educ Online. 2016 Sep 2;21:31940. doi: 10.3402/meo.v21.31940. eCollection 2016.
3
Preserving third year medical students' empathy and enhancing self-reflection using small group "virtual hangout" technology.运用小组“虚拟聚会”技术保持三年级医学生的同理心并增强自我反思能力。
Med Teach. 2015;37(6):566-71. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2014.956057. Epub 2014 Sep 5.
4
Holistic feedback approach with video and peer discussion under teacher supervision.在教师监督下采用视频和同伴讨论的整体反馈方法。
BMC Med Educ. 2017 Sep 29;17(1):179. doi: 10.1186/s12909-017-1017-x.
5
Student and educator experiences of maternal-child simulation-based learning: a systematic review of qualitative evidence protocol.基于母婴模拟学习的学生和教育工作者体验:定性证据协议的系统评价
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):14-26. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1694.
6
Enhancing medical students' reflectivity in mentoring groups for professional development - a qualitative analysis.促进医学学生在导师小组中的反思能力以促进专业发展 - 一项定性分析。
BMC Med Educ. 2017 Jul 14;17(1):122. doi: 10.1186/s12909-017-0951-y.
7
HEAL: an instructional design model applied to an online clerkship in family medicine.HEAL:一种应用于家庭医学在线临床实习的教学设计模型。
Acad Med. 2002 Sep;77(9):925-6.
8
Provision of e-learning programmes to replace undergraduate medical students' clinical general practice attachments during COVID-19 stand-down.在 COVID-19 停课期间提供电子学习课程以取代本科医学生的临床全科实习。
Educ Prim Care. 2020 Jul;31(4):247-254. doi: 10.1080/14739879.2020.1772123. Epub 2020 May 29.
9
Collaborative online learning: a new approach to distance CME.协作式在线学习:远程继续医学教育的新方法。
Acad Med. 2002 Sep;77(9):928-9.
10
Influence of a highly focused case on the effect of small-group facilitators' content expertise on students' learning and satisfaction.一个高度聚焦的案例对小组促进者的内容专业知识对学生学习和满意度的影响。
Acad Med. 1994 Aug;69(8):663-9. doi: 10.1097/00001888-199408000-00016.

引用本文的文献

1
The utility of an online discussion board for reflective writing in an emergency medicine rotation.在线讨论板在急诊医学轮转中用于反思性写作的效用。
AEM Educ Train. 2023 Jul 30;7(4):e10899. doi: 10.1002/aet2.10899. eCollection 2023 Aug.
2
Understanding the Functional Components of Technology-Enhanced Learning Environment in Medical Education: A Scoping Review.理解医学教育中技术增强学习环境的功能组件:一项范围综述。
Med Sci Educ. 2023 Feb 28;33(2):595-609. doi: 10.1007/s40670-023-01747-6. eCollection 2023 Apr.
3
The use of a technology-assisted and teacher-supervised online discussion platform to promote academic progress in blended embryology courses.
利用技术辅助和教师监督的在线讨论平台来促进混合胚胎学课程的学业进步。
BMC Med Educ. 2022 Nov 29;22(1):817. doi: 10.1186/s12909-022-03890-x.
4
Alternatives surgical training approaches during COVID-19 pandemic.新冠疫情期间外科培训的替代方法。
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2021 Feb;62:253-257. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2021.01.057. Epub 2021 Jan 21.