Suppr超能文献

早期与晚期气管切开术或延长气管插管对急性脑损伤重症患者的影响:一项系统评价和荟萃分析

Effect of Early Versus Late Tracheostomy or Prolonged Intubation in Critically Ill Patients with Acute Brain Injury: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

作者信息

McCredie Victoria A, Alali Aziz S, Scales Damon C, Adhikari Neill K J, Rubenfeld Gordon D, Cuthbertson Brian H, Nathens Avery B

机构信息

Department of Critical Care Medicine, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, 2075 Bayview Ave, Toronto, M4N 3M5, Canada.

Sunnybrook Research Institute, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, M4N 3M5, Canada.

出版信息

Neurocrit Care. 2017 Feb;26(1):14-25. doi: 10.1007/s12028-016-0297-z.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The optimal timing of tracheostomy placement in acutely brain-injured patients, who generally require endotracheal intubation for airway protection rather than respiratory failure, remains uncertain. We systematically reviewed trials comparing early tracheostomy to late tracheostomy or prolonged intubation in these patients.

METHODS

We searched 5 databases (from inception to April 2015) to identify randomized controlled trials comparing early tracheostomy (≤10 days of intubation) with late tracheostomy (>10 days) or prolonged intubation in acutely brain-injured patients. We contacted the principal authors of included trials to obtain subgroup data. Two reviewers extracted data and assessed risk of bias. Outcomes included long-term mortality (primary), short-term mortality, duration of mechanical ventilation, complications, and liberation from ventilation without a tracheostomy. Meta-analyses used random-effects models.

RESULTS

Ten trials (503 patients) met selection criteria; overall study quality was moderate to good. Early tracheostomy reduced long-term mortality (risk ratio [RR] 0.57. 95 % confidence interval (CI), 0.36-0.90; p = 0.02; n = 135), although in a sensitivity analysis excluding one trial, with an unclear risk of bias, the significant finding was attenuated (RR 0.61, 95 % CI, 0.32-1.16; p = 0.13; n = 95). Early tracheostomy reduced duration of mechanical ventilation (mean difference [MD] -2.72 days, 95 % CI, -1.29 to -4.15; p = 0.0002; n = 412) and ICU length of stay (MD -2.55 days, 95 % CI, -0.50 to -4.59; p = 0.01; n = 326). However, early tracheostomy did not reduce short-term mortality (RR 1.25; 95 % CI, 0.68-2.30; p = 0.47 n = 301) and increased the probability of ever receiving a tracheostomy (RR 1.58, 95 % CI, 1.24-2.02; 0 < 0.001; n = 377).

CONCLUSIONS

Performing an early tracheostomy in acutely brain-injured patients may reduce long-term mortality, duration of mechanical ventilation, and ICU length of stay. However, waiting longer leads to fewer tracheostomy procedures and similar short-term mortality. Future research to explore the optimal timing of tracheostomy in this patient population should focus on patient-centered outcomes including patient comfort, functional outcomes, and long-term mortality.

摘要

背景

急性脑损伤患者通常需要气管插管以保护气道而非因呼吸衰竭,气管切开术的最佳时机仍不确定。我们系统回顾了比较早期气管切开术与晚期气管切开术或延长插管时间的试验。

方法

我们检索了5个数据库(从建库至2015年4月),以确定比较急性脑损伤患者早期气管切开术(插管≤10天)与晚期气管切开术(>10天)或延长插管时间的随机对照试验。我们联系了纳入试验的主要作者以获取亚组数据。两名研究者提取数据并评估偏倚风险。结局包括长期死亡率(主要结局)、短期死亡率、机械通气时间、并发症以及无需气管切开术即可脱离通气。荟萃分析采用随机效应模型。

结果

10项试验(503例患者)符合入选标准;总体研究质量为中等至良好。早期气管切开术降低了长期死亡率(风险比[RR]0.57,95%置信区间[CI],0.36 - 0.90;p = 0.02;n = 135),尽管在一项敏感性分析中排除了一项偏倚风险不明的试验后,这一显著结果有所减弱(RR 0.61,95% CI,0.32 - 1.16;p = 0.13;n = 95)。早期气管切开术缩短了机械通气时间(平均差[MD] -2.72天,95% CI,-1.29至-4.15;p = 0.0002;n = 412)和ICU住院时间(MD -2.55天),95% CI,-0.50至-4.59;p = 0.01;n = 326)。然而,早期气管切开术并未降低短期死亡率(RR 1.25;95% CI,0.68 - 2.30;p = 0.47;n = 301),且增加了接受气管切开术的可能性(RR 1.58,95% CI,1.24 - 2.02;p < 0.001;n = 377)。

结论

对急性脑损伤患者实施早期气管切开术可能降低长期死亡率、缩短机械通气时间和ICU住院时间。然而,等待更长时间会减少气管切开术的操作次数且短期死亡率相似。未来探索该患者群体气管切开术最佳时机的研究应关注以患者为中心的结局,包括患者舒适度、功能结局和长期死亡率。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验