Iftakhar-E-Khuda Imtiaz, Fair-Mäkelä Ruth, Kukkonen-Macchi Anu, Elima Kati, Karikoski Marika, Rantakari Pia, Miyasaka Masayuki, Salmi Marko, Jalkanen Sirpa
MediCity Research Laboratory, University of Turku, 20520 Turku, Finland;
MediCity Research Laboratory, University of Turku, 20520 Turku, Finland; Department of Medical Biochemistry and Genetics, University of Turku, 20520 Turku, Finland;
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Sep 20;113(38):10643-8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1602357113. Epub 2016 Sep 6.
Afferent lymphatic vessels bring antigens and diverse populations of leukocytes to draining lymph nodes, whereas efferent lymphatics allow only lymphocytes and antigens to leave the nodes. Despite the fundamental importance of afferent vs. efferent lymphatics in immune response and cancer spread, the molecular characteristics of these different arms of the lymphatic vasculature are largely unknown. The objective of this work was to explore molecular differences behind the distinct functions of afferent and efferent lymphatic vessels, and find possible molecules mediating lymphocyte traffic. We used laser-capture microdissection and cell sorting to isolate lymphatic endothelial cells (LECs) from the subcapsular sinus (SS, afferent) and lymphatic sinus (LS, efferent) for transcriptional analyses. The results reveal marked differences between afferent and efferent LECs and identify molecules on lymphatic vessels. Further characterizations of Siglec-1 (CD169) and macrophage scavenger receptor 1 (MSR1/CD204), show that they are discriminatively expressed on lymphatic endothelium of the SS but not on lymphatic vasculature of the LS. In contrast, endomucin (EMCN) is present on the LS endothelium and not on lymphatic endothelium of the SS. Moreover, both murine and human MSR1 on lymphatic endothelium of the SS bind lymphocytes and in in vivo studies MSR1 regulates entrance of lymphocytes from the SS to the lymph node parenchyma. In conclusion, this paper reports surprisingly distinct molecular profiles for afferent and efferent lymphatics and a function for MSR1. These results may open avenues to explore some of the now-identified molecules as targets to manipulate the function of lymphatic vessels.
输入淋巴管将抗原和多种白细胞群体输送到引流淋巴结,而输出淋巴管只允许淋巴细胞和抗原离开淋巴结。尽管输入淋巴管与输出淋巴管在免疫反应和癌症扩散中具有根本重要性,但这些不同的淋巴管分支的分子特征在很大程度上尚不清楚。这项工作的目的是探索输入淋巴管和输出淋巴管不同功能背后的分子差异,并找到可能介导淋巴细胞运输的分子。我们使用激光捕获显微切割和细胞分选技术,从被膜下窦(SS,输入淋巴管)和淋巴窦(LS,输出淋巴管)中分离淋巴管内皮细胞(LEC)进行转录分析。结果揭示了输入和输出LEC之间的显著差异,并确定了淋巴管上的分子。对唾液酸结合免疫球蛋白样凝集素-1(Siglec-1,CD169)和巨噬细胞清道夫受体1(MSR1/CD204)的进一步表征表明,它们在SS的淋巴管内皮上有特异性表达,而在LS的淋巴管上没有。相反,内黏蛋白(EMCN)存在于LS内皮上,而不存在于SS的淋巴管内皮上。此外,SS淋巴管内皮上的小鼠和人类MSR1都能结合淋巴细胞,并且在体内研究中,MSR1调节淋巴细胞从SS进入淋巴结实质。总之,本文报道了输入淋巴管和输出淋巴管令人惊讶的不同分子谱以及MSR1的一种功能。这些结果可能为探索一些现已确定的分子作为操纵淋巴管功能的靶点开辟途径。