Suppr超能文献

一项评估药物不良反应成本的观察性研究的系统评价。

A systematic review of observational studies evaluating costs of adverse drug reactions.

作者信息

Batel Marques Francisco, Penedones Ana, Mendes Diogo, Alves Carlos

机构信息

CHAD - Centre for Health Technology Assessment and Drug Research, AIBILI - Association for Innovation and Biomedical Research on Light and Image; School of Pharmacy, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal.

出版信息

Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2016 Aug 24;8:413-26. doi: 10.2147/CEOR.S115689. eCollection 2016.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The growing evidence of the increased frequency and severity of adverse drug events (ADEs), besides the negative impact on patient's health status, indicates that costs due to ADEs may be steadily rising. Observational studies are an important tool in pharmacovigilance. Despite these studies being more susceptible to bias than experimental designs, they are more competent in assessing ADEs and their associated costs.

OBJECTIVE

To identify and characterize the best available evidence on ADE-associated costs.

METHODS

MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, and Embase were searched from 1995 to 2015. Observational studies were included. The methodological quality of selected studies was assessed by Cochrane Collaboration tool for experimental and observational studies. Studies were classified according to the setting analyzed in "ambulatory", "hospital", or both. Costs were classified as "direct" and "indirect". Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. The total incremental cost per patient with ADE was estimated.

RESULTS

Twenty-nine (94%) longitudinal observational studies and two (7%) cross-sectional studies were included. Twenty-three (74%) studies were assessed with the highest methodological quality score. The studies were mainly conducted in the US (61%). Twenty (65%) studies evaluated any therapeutic group. Twenty (65%) studies estimated costs of ADEs leading to or prolonging hospitalization. The "direct costs" were evaluated in all studies, whereas only two (7%) also estimated the "indirect costs". The "direct costs" in ambulatory ranged from €702.21 to €40,273.08, and the in hospital from €943.40 to €7,192.36.

DISCUSSION

Methodological heterogeneities were identified among the included studies, such as design, type of ADEs, suspected drugs, and type and structure of costs. Despite such discrepancies, the financial burden associated with ADE costs was found to be high. In the light of the present findings, validated methods to measure ADE-associated costs need future research efforts.

摘要

引言

越来越多的证据表明药物不良事件(ADEs)的发生频率和严重程度在增加,这除了对患者健康状况产生负面影响外,还表明ADEs导致的成本可能在稳步上升。观察性研究是药物警戒中的一项重要工具。尽管这些研究比实验设计更容易受到偏倚影响,但它们在评估ADEs及其相关成本方面更具优势。

目的

识别并描述关于ADEs相关成本的最佳现有证据。

方法

检索1995年至2015年的MEDLINE、Cochrane图书馆和Embase。纳入观察性研究。采用Cochrane协作组织用于实验性和观察性研究的工具评估所选研究的方法学质量。根据在“门诊”、“医院”或两者中分析的环境对研究进行分类。成本分为“直接”和“间接”。使用描述性统计分析数据。估计每位发生ADE的患者的总增量成本。

结果

纳入29项(94%)纵向观察性研究和2项(7%)横断面研究。23项(74%)研究的方法学质量得分最高。这些研究主要在美国进行(61%)。20项(65%)研究评估了任何治疗组。20项(65%)研究估计了导致或延长住院时间的ADEs成本。所有研究都评估了“直接成本”,而只有两项(7%)也估计了“间接成本”。门诊的“直接成本”从702.21欧元到40273.08欧元不等,住院的从943.40欧元到7192.36欧元不等。

讨论

在所纳入的研究中发现了方法学上的异质性,如设计、ADEs类型、可疑药物以及成本的类型和结构。尽管存在这些差异,但发现与ADEs成本相关的财务负担很高。根据目前的研究结果,测量ADEs相关成本的有效方法需要未来的研究努力。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4488/5003513/a58a9fc28349/ceor-8-413Fig1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验