Golden D B, Addison B I, Gadde J, Kagey-Sobotka A, Valentine M D, Lichtenstein L M
Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, The Good Samaritan Hospital, Baltimore, Md.
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1989 Aug;84(2):162-7. doi: 10.1016/0091-6749(89)90320-5.
After a decade spent establishing the safety, efficacy, and optimal techniques for venom immunotherapy, we have begun a series of studies to determine how long venom immunotherapy must be continued. In retrospective surveys, patients who had stopped venom immunotherapy after 1 to 2 years had a substantial risk (25%) of systemic sting reactions, but this was less than 50% of the risk in untreated patients. In this first prospective study, 30 patients elected to stop venom immunotherapy after at least 5 years of therapy. Skin test sensitivity had decreased significantly during therapy in 18/30 patients but remained clearly positive in 23/30 (seven patients became equivocal or negative). Serum venom-specific IgE antibodies were at the lower limit of detection (1 ng/ml) in 11/30 patients. After stopping treatment, the mean serum venom-specific IgG antibody level declined from 5.5 +/- 0.6 micrograms/ml to 2.4 +/- 0.3 micrograms/ml by 9 months, which is the same as the mean venom IgG in untreated patients. After 12 months without therapy, live sting challenge caused no systemic reaction in 29 patients. The mean venom IgG level 1 month after the sting had risen significantly to 4.1 +/- 0.5 micrograms/ml, but there was no significant increase of venom IgE. These results suggest that prolonged venom immunotherapy leads to isotype-specific suppression of the venom IgE antibody response and may provide persistent clinical protection by mechanisms other than IgG blocking antibodies. The observations are to be interpreted very cautiously. Further investigations are needed to extend these observations in additional patients and for longer periods of time, and to examine possible mechanisms for this apparent loss of clinical reactivity.
在花费十年时间确立了毒液免疫疗法的安全性、有效性及最佳技术之后,我们开始了一系列研究,以确定毒液免疫疗法必须持续多长时间。在回顾性调查中,接受1至2年毒液免疫疗法后停药的患者发生全身性蜇刺反应的风险较高(25%),但这不到未治疗患者风险的50%。在这项首次前瞻性研究中,30名患者在接受至少5年治疗后选择停止毒液免疫疗法。18/30的患者在治疗期间皮肤试验敏感性显著降低,但23/30的患者皮肤试验仍呈明显阳性(7名患者变为可疑或阴性)。11/30的患者血清毒液特异性IgE抗体处于检测下限(1 ng/ml)。停止治疗后,9个月时血清毒液特异性IgG抗体平均水平从5.5±0.6微克/毫升降至2.4±0.3微克/毫升,与未治疗患者的毒液IgG平均水平相同。在未经治疗的12个月后,29名患者进行的活蜇刺激发试验未引起全身性反应。蜇刺后1个月毒液IgG平均水平显著升高至4.1±0.5微克/毫升,但毒液IgE无显著增加。这些结果表明,延长毒液免疫疗法可导致毒液IgE抗体反应的同型特异性抑制,并可能通过除IgG阻断抗体之外的其他机制提供持续的临床保护。这些观察结果的解读需非常谨慎。需要进一步研究,以便在更多患者中更长时间地扩展这些观察结果,并研究这种明显的临床反应性丧失的可能机制。