Singh Jasvinder A, Yu Shaohua
Medicine Service, Birmingham VA Medical Center, Birmingham, AL, USA.
Department of Medicine at School of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB), Birmingham, AL, USA.
BMC Neurol. 2016 Sep 7;16(1):164. doi: 10.1186/s12883-016-0692-2.
Previous studies of allopurinol and stroke risk have provided contradictory findings, ranging from a protective effect to an increased risk. Our objective was to assess whether allopurinol use is associated with the risk of stroke in the elderly.
We used the 5 % random sample of Medicare beneficiaries from 2006-2012 to study the association of new allopurinol initiation and incident stroke. We used multivariable-adjusted Cox regression models adjusted for age, gender, race, Charlson index, and cardio-protective medications (beta-blockers, ACE inhibitors, diuretics, statins) to calculate hazards ratio (HR) with 95 % confidence intervals (CI). Sensitivity analyses adjusted for coronary artery disease (CAD) risk factors including hypertension, hyperlipidemia, diabetes, and smoking instead of Charlson index.
Among 28,488 eligible episodes of incident allopurinol, 2,177 ended in incident stroke (7.6 % episodes). In multivariable-adjusted analyses, allopurinol use was associated with 9 % lower hazard ratio for stoke, 0.91 (95 % CI, 0.83 to 0.99). Compared to no allopurinol use, allopurinol use durations of 181 days to 2 years, 0.88 (95 % CI, 0.78 to 0.99) and >2 years, 0.79 (95 % CI, 0.65 to 0.96) were significantly associated with lower multivariable-adjusted hazard of stroke. Sensitivity analyses adjusted for CAD risk factors confirmed these findings. In subgroup analyses, significant associations were noted between allopurinol use and the risk of ischemic stroke, 0.89 (95 % CI, 0.81 to 0.98); associations were not significant for hemorrhagic stroke, 1.01 (95 % CI, 0.79 to 1.29).
Allopurinol use is associated with lower risk of stroke overall, more specifically ischemic stroke. This association is evident after 6-months of allopurinol use, and the hazard reduction increases with longer duration of use. Future studies need to examine underlying mechanisms.
先前关于别嘌醇与中风风险的研究结果相互矛盾,从具有保护作用到增加风险不等。我们的目的是评估使用别嘌醇是否与老年人中风风险相关。
我们使用了2006年至2012年医疗保险受益人的5%随机样本,以研究新开始使用别嘌醇与中风发病之间的关联。我们使用多变量调整的Cox回归模型,对年龄、性别、种族、查尔森指数和心脏保护药物(β受体阻滞剂、血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂、利尿剂、他汀类药物)进行调整,以计算风险比(HR)及95%置信区间(CI)。敏感性分析针对冠状动脉疾病(CAD)风险因素进行调整,包括高血压、高脂血症、糖尿病和吸烟,而非查尔森指数。
在28488例符合条件的别嘌醇起始事件中,2177例以中风发病告终(7.6%的事件)。在多变量调整分析中,使用别嘌醇与中风风险比降低9%相关,为0.91(95%CI,0.83至0.99)。与未使用别嘌醇相比,使用别嘌醇181天至2年,风险比为0.88(95%CI,0.78至0.99),使用别嘌醇超过2年,风险比为0.79(95%CI,0.65至0.96),均与多变量调整后的中风风险显著降低相关。针对CAD风险因素进行调整的敏感性分析证实了这些结果。在亚组分析中,使用别嘌醇与缺血性中风风险之间存在显著关联,风险比为0.89(95%CI,0.81至0.98);与出血性中风的关联不显著,风险比为1.01(95%CI,0.79至1.29)。
使用别嘌醇总体上与较低的中风风险相关,更具体地说是与缺血性中风风险相关。这种关联在使用别嘌醇6个月后明显,且随着使用时间延长风险降低幅度增大。未来的研究需要探讨潜在机制。