Gillen Alex M, Munsterman Amelia S, Farag Ramsis, Coleridge Matthew O D, Reid Hanson R
Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Samual Ginn College of Engineering, Auburn University, Auburn, Alabama.
Department of Polymer and Fiber Engineering, Samual Ginn College of Engineering, Auburn University, Auburn, Alabama.
Vet Surg. 2016 Oct;45(7):955-961. doi: 10.1111/vsu.12538. Epub 2016 Sep 8.
To evaluate the strength, size, and holding capacity of the Aberdeen knot compared to surgeon's and square knots using large gauge suture.
In vitro mechanical study.
Knotted suture.
Aberdeen, surgeon's, and square knots were tested using 2 and 3 USP polyglactin 910 and 2 USP polydioxanone under linear tension on a universal testing machine. Mode of failure and knot holding capacity (KHC) were recorded and relative knot security (RKS) was calculated as a percentage of KHC. Knot volume and weight were quantified by a digital micrometer and balance, respectively. Strength between number of throws, suture, suture size, and knot type were compared by ANOVA and post hoc testing. P≤.05 was considered significant.
Aberdeen knots had higher KHC and RKS than surgeon's or square knots for all suture types and number of throws (P<.001). For all suture materials, none of the Aberdeen knots unraveled, but a portion of square and surgeon's knots with <7 throws did unravel (P=.101). Aberdeen knots had a smaller volume and weight than both surgeon's and square knots with equal numbers of throws (P<.001). The knot with the combined highest RKS and smallest size and weight was an Aberdeen knot with 4 throws using 3 USP polyglactin 910.
The Aberdeen knots were stronger, more secure, and smaller than surgeon's and square knots for ending a continuous suture pattern. Clinically, the Aberdeen knot may be a useful alternative for completion of continuous patterns using large gauge suture, without sacrificing knot integrity.
使用大规格缝线,评估阿伯丁结与外科结和方结相比的强度、大小及持结能力。
体外力学研究。
打结缝线。
在万能试验机上,对阿伯丁结、外科结和方结使用2号和3号美国药典聚乙醇酸910缝线以及2号美国药典聚二氧六环酮缝线进行线性张力测试。记录失效模式和结持结能力(KHC),并计算相对结安全性(RKS),以KHC的百分比表示。分别用数字千分尺和天平对结的体积和重量进行量化。通过方差分析和事后检验比较不同打结次数、缝线、缝线规格及结类型之间的强度。P≤0.05被认为具有统计学意义。
对于所有缝线类型和打结次数,阿伯丁结的KHC和RKS均高于外科结或方结(P<0.001)。对于所有缝线材料,阿伯丁结均未解开,但部分打结次数<7次的方结和外科结出现了解开情况(P=0.101)。在打结次数相同的情况下,阿伯丁结的体积和重量均小于外科结和方结(P<0.001)。结合最高RKS以及最小尺寸和重量的结是使用3号美国药典聚乙醇酸910缝线打4次的阿伯丁结。
在结束连续缝合模式时,阿伯丁结比外科结和方结更强、更安全且更小。临床上,阿伯丁结可能是使用大规格缝线完成连续缝合模式的有用替代方法,且不牺牲结的完整性。