Suppr超能文献

作为血管结扎第一结使用的单丝或多丝缝线的四种摩擦结的体外固定安全性。

In vitro holding security of four friction knots of monofilament or multifilament suture used as a first throw for vascular ligation.

作者信息

Tremolada Giovanni, Hazenfield Kurt M, Smeak Daniel D

出版信息

Am J Vet Res. 2020 Oct;81(10):821-826. doi: 10.2460/ajvr.81.10.821.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate holding security of 4 friction knots created with various monofilament and multifilament sutures in a vascular ligation model.

SAMPLE

280 friction knot constructs.

PROCEDURES

10 friction knots of 4 types (surgeon's throw, Miller knot, Ashley modification of the Miller knot, and strangle knot) created with 2-0 monofilament (polyglyconate, polydioxanone, poliglecaprone-25, and glycomer-631) and braided multifilament (silk, lactomer, and polyglactin-910) sutures were separately tied on a mock pedicle and pressure tested to the point of leakage. Linear regression analysis was performed to compare leakage pressures among suture materials (within friction knot type) and among knot types (within suture material).

RESULTS

Mean leakage pressure of surgeon's throws was significantly lower than that of all other knots tested, regardless of the suture material used. All the other knots had mean leakage pressures considered supraphysiological. Significant differences in mean leakage pressure were detected between various friction knots tied with the same type of suture and various suture types used to create a given knot. Variability in leakage pressure among knots other than the surgeon's throw was greatest for poliglecaprone-25 and lowest for polydioxanone.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Most differences in knot security, although statistically significant, may not have been clinically relevant. However, results of these in vitro tests suggested the surgeon's throw should be avoided as a first throw for pedicle ligation and that poliglecaprone-25 may be more prone to friction knot slippage than the other suture materials evaluated.

摘要

目的

在血管结扎模型中评估用各种单丝和多丝缝线制作的4种摩擦结的结扎安全性。

样本

280个摩擦结结构。

方法

用2-0单丝缝线(聚乙醇酸、聚二氧六环酮、聚乙交酯-25和甘醇共聚物-631)和编织多丝缝线(丝线、聚乙交酯丙交酯、聚乳酸-910)制作4种类型(外科结、米勒结、米勒结的阿什利改良结和绞索结)的10个摩擦结,分别结扎在模拟蒂上并进行压力测试直至漏血。进行线性回归分析以比较缝线材料之间(在摩擦结类型内)和结类型之间(在缝线材料内)的漏血压力。

结果

无论使用何种缝线材料,外科结的平均漏血压力均显著低于所有其他测试结。所有其他结的平均漏血压力均被认为高于生理水平。在用同类型缝线制作的各种摩擦结之间以及用于制作给定结的各种缝线类型之间,检测到平均漏血压力存在显著差异。除外科结外,聚乙交酯-25的结之间漏血压力的变异性最大,聚二氧六环酮的最小。

结论及临床意义

结安全性的大多数差异虽然具有统计学意义,但可能在临床上并不相关。然而,这些体外测试结果表明,作为蒂结扎的第一结应避免使用外科结,并且聚乙交酯-25可能比其他评估的缝线材料更容易出现摩擦结滑脱。

相似文献

7
Knot security of suture materials.缝合材料的结安全性。
Vet Surg. 1989 Jul-Aug;18(4):269-73. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-950x.1989.tb01083.x.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验