Kösem Anne, Basirat Anahita, Azizi Leila, van Wassenhove Virginie
Cognitive Neuroimaging Unit, CEA DRF/I2BM, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, Université Paris-Sud, Université Paris-Saclay, Gif/Yvette, France;
Radboud University, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
J Neurophysiol. 2016 Dec 1;116(6):2497-2512. doi: 10.1152/jn.00074.2016. Epub 2016 Sep 7.
During speech listening, the brain parses a continuous acoustic stream of information into computational units (e.g., syllables or words) necessary for speech comprehension. Recent neuroscientific hypotheses have proposed that neural oscillations contribute to speech parsing, but whether they do so on the basis of acoustic cues (bottom-up acoustic parsing) or as a function of available linguistic representations (top-down linguistic parsing) is unknown. In this magnetoencephalography study, we contrasted acoustic and linguistic parsing using bistable speech sequences. While listening to the speech sequences, participants were asked to maintain one of the two possible speech percepts through volitional control. We predicted that the tracking of speech dynamics by neural oscillations would not only follow the acoustic properties but also shift in time according to the participant's conscious speech percept. Our results show that the latency of high-frequency activity (specifically, beta and gamma bands) varied as a function of the perceptual report. In contrast, the phase of low-frequency oscillations was not strongly affected by top-down control. Whereas changes in low-frequency neural oscillations were compatible with the encoding of prelexical segmentation cues, high-frequency activity specifically informed on an individual's conscious speech percept.
在言语聆听过程中,大脑会将连续的声学信息流解析为言语理解所需的计算单元(如音节或单词)。最近的神经科学假说提出,神经振荡有助于言语解析,但它们是基于声学线索(自下而上的声学解析)还是作为可用语言表征的函数(自上而下的语言解析)来实现这一点尚不清楚。在这项脑磁图研究中,我们使用双稳态言语序列对比了声学解析和语言解析。在聆听言语序列时,要求参与者通过自主控制维持两种可能的言语感知之一。我们预测,神经振荡对言语动态的追踪不仅会遵循声学特性,还会根据参与者有意识的言语感知在时间上发生变化。我们的结果表明,高频活动(具体为β和γ频段)的潜伏期会随感知报告而变化。相比之下,低频振荡的相位受自上而下控制的影响不大。虽然低频神经振荡的变化与词汇前分割线索的编码一致,但高频活动则具体反映了个体有意识的言语感知。