Suppr超能文献

哮喘控制测量工具在哮喘管理中的知识与应用:尼日利亚家庭医学和内科医生工作情况调查

Knowledge and use of asthma control measurement tools in the management of asthma: a survey of doctors working in family and internal medicine practice in Nigeria.

作者信息

Desalu Olufemi Olumuyiwa, Onyedum Cajetan C, Adeoti Adekunle O, Ozoh Obianuju B, Fadare Joseph O

机构信息

Department of Medicine , University of Ilorin Teaching Hospital.

Department of Medicine, University of Nigeria Teaching Hospital Ituku Ozalla Enugu.

出版信息

Afr Health Sci. 2016 Jun;16(2):480-9. doi: 10.4314/ahs.v16i2.16.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the knowledge and use of asthma control measurement (ACM) tools in the management of asthma among doctors working in family and internal medicine practice in Nigeria.

METHOD

A questionnaire based on the global initiative on asthma (GINA) guideline was self-administered by 194 doctors. It contains 12 test items on knowledge of ACM tools and its application. The knowledge score was obtained by adding the correct answers and classified as good if the score ≥ 9, satisfactory if score was 6-8 and poor if < 6.

RESULTS

The overall doctors knowledge score of ACM tools was 4.49±2.14 (maximum of 12). Pulmonologists recorded the highest knowledge score of 10.75±1.85. The majority (69.6%) had poor knowledge score of ACM tools. Fifty (25.8%) assessed their patients' level of asthma control and 34(17.5%) at every visit. Thirty-nine (20.1%) used ACM tools in their consultation, 29 (15.0%) of them used GINA defined control while 10 (5.2 %) used asthma control test (ACT). The use of the tools was associated with pulmonologists, having attended CME within six months and graduated within five years prior to the survey.

CONCLUSION

The results highlight the poor knowledge and use of ACM tools and the need to address the knowledge gap.

摘要

目的

调查尼日利亚从事家庭医学和内科的医生在哮喘管理中对哮喘控制测量(ACM)工具的认知及使用情况。

方法

194名医生自行填写基于全球哮喘防治创议(GINA)指南的问卷。问卷包含12个关于ACM工具知识及其应用的测试项目。知识得分通过将正确答案相加得出,得分≥9分为良好,6 - 8分为满意,<6分为差。

结果

医生对ACM工具的总体知识得分为4.49±2.14(满分12分)。肺科医生的知识得分最高,为10.75±1.85。大多数(69.6%)医生对ACM工具的知识得分较差。50名(25.8%)医生每次就诊时评估患者的哮喘控制水平,34名(17.5%)医生每次都会评估。39名(20.1%)医生在会诊中使用ACM工具,其中29名(15.0%)使用GINA定义的控制方法,10名(5.2%)使用哮喘控制测试(ACT)。工具的使用与肺科医生、在调查前六个月内参加过继续医学教育以及在调查前五年内毕业有关。

结论

结果凸显了对ACM工具的认知和使用不足,以及弥补知识差距的必要性。

相似文献

6
Does guideline knowledge affect treatment compliance among emergency doctors?
Am J Med Sci. 2014 Nov;348(5):357-61. doi: 10.1097/MAJ.0000000000000269.
8
Guideline-defined asthma control: a challenge for primary care.
Eur Respir J. 2008 Feb;31(2):229-31. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00157507.

引用本文的文献

3
Knowledge and practice of the Global Initiative for Asthma report among community pharmacists in a Nigerian State.
Pan Afr Med J. 2020 Sep 23;37:83. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2020.37.83.18897. eCollection 2020.
6
Implementation of GINA guidelines in asthma management by primary care physicians in Vietnam.
Int J Gen Med. 2017 Oct 5;10:347-355. doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S147752. eCollection 2017.

本文引用的文献

1
The ACT and the ATAQ are useful surrogates for asthma control in resource-poor countries with inadequate spirometric facilities.
J Asthma. 2012 Dec;49(10):1086-91. doi: 10.3109/02770903.2012.729632. Epub 2012 Oct 17.
2
Assessment of the level of asthma control among adult patients in two tertiary care centers in Nigeria.
J Asthma. 2012 Sep;49(7):765-72. doi: 10.3109/02770903.2012.690478. Epub 2012 Aug 9.
4
Asthma in Nigeria: are the facilities and resources available to support internationally endorsed standards of care?
Health Policy. 2011 Mar;99(3):250-4. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2010.10.006. Epub 2010 Nov 5.
8
Achieving asthma control in practice: understanding the reasons for poor control.
Respir Med. 2008 Dec;102(12):1681-93. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2008.08.003. Epub 2008 Sep 23.
9
Assessment of control in asthma: the new focus in management.
Indian J Chest Dis Allied Sci. 2008 Jan-Mar;50(1):109-16.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验