Jou Jerwen, Arredondo Mario L, Li Cheng, Escamilla Eric E, Zuniga Richard
a Department of Psychological Science , University of Texas-Rio Grande Valley , Edinburg , TX, USA.
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2017 Oct;70(10):2076-2093. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2016.1222446. Epub 2016 Sep 8.
In this study, the number of semantic associates in Deese-Roediger-McDermott (DRM) lists was varied from 4 to 14 in a modified Sternberg paradigm. The false alarm (FA) and correct rejection (CR) reaction time (RT)/memory-set size (MSS) functions of critical lures showed a cross-over interaction at approximately MSS 7, suggesting a reversal of the relative dominance between these two responses to the critical lure at this point and also indicating the location of the boundary between the sub- and supraspan MSS. For the subspan lists, FA to critical lures was slower than CR, suggesting a slow, strategic mechanism driving the false memory. Conversely, for the supraspan lists, critical lure FA was faster than its CR, suggesting a spontaneous mechanism driving the false memory. Results of two experiments showed that an automatic, fast, and a slow, controlled process could be error-prone or error-corrective, depending on the length of the DRM memory list. Thus there is a dual retrieval process in false memory as in true memory. The findings can be explained by both the activation/monitoring and the fuzzy-trace theories.
在本研究中,在改良的斯特恩伯格范式中,迪塞-罗迪格-麦克德莫特(DRM)列表中的语义关联数量从4个变化到14个。关键诱饵的错误警报(FA)和正确拒绝(CR)反应时间(RT)/记忆集大小(MSS)函数在大约MSS为7时呈现出交叉交互作用,这表明此时对关键诱饵的这两种反应之间相对优势发生了逆转,同时也表明了子跨度和超跨度MSS之间边界的位置。对于子跨度列表,对关键诱饵的FA比CR慢,这表明存在一种缓慢的、策略性的机制驱动错误记忆。相反,对于超跨度列表,关键诱饵的FA比其CR快,这表明存在一种自发机制驱动错误记忆。两项实验的结果表明,一个自动、快速的过程和一个缓慢、受控制的过程可能容易出错或纠正错误,这取决于DRM记忆列表的长度。因此,与真实记忆一样,错误记忆中也存在双重检索过程。这些发现可以通过激活/监测理论和模糊痕迹理论来解释。