• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

2016 年美国食品和药物管理局循环系统设备顾问小组会议概述:Absorb 生物可吸收血管支架系统。

Overview of the 2016 U.S. Food and Drug Administration Circulatory System Devices Advisory Panel Meeting on the Absorb Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold System.

机构信息

Section of Interventional Cardiology, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC.

Section of Interventional Cardiology, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC.

出版信息

JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Sep 12;9(17):1757-64. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2016.06.027.

DOI:10.1016/j.jcin.2016.06.027
PMID:27609249
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This study aims to describe the discussions and recommendations made during the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Circulatory System Device Panel pre-market approval application for the Absorb Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold (BVS) System.

BACKGROUND

The Absorb BVS System is a first-of-its-kind fully bioresorbable percutaneous coronary intervention technology. The absorb BVS was studied in the ABSORB III (A Clinical Evaluation of Absorb BVS, the Everolimus Eluting Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold in the Treatment of Subjects with de Novo Native Coronary Artery Lesions) trial, the pivotal U.S. investigational device exemption trial.

METHODS

Observational report of the FDA Circulatory System Device Panel pre-market approval application meeting held on March 15, 2016.

RESULTS

The U.S. FDA Circulatory System Device Panel members reviewed the ABSROB III trial outcomes and additional post hoc analyses presented by the sponsor and the FDA. The ABSORB III trial met the primary endpoint of noninferiority of Absorb BVS compared with the control, XIENCE drug-eluting stent, for target lesion failure at 1 year. Although a higher numerical trend for adverse outcomes was reported for the Absorb BVS, there were no statistical differences between Absorb BVS and XIENCE for any safety or effectiveness components for target lesion failure or for the secondary pre-specified outcomes. Panel members raised concerns with regard to the ABSORB III results and post hoc analyses focusing mainly on the noninferiority design of the trial, the apparent safety issues of the Absorb BVS in small vessels, the mismatch of visually versus intravascular imaging assessed vessel size found in ABSORB III and its implications on the adequate device labeling, the safety of Absorb BVS in specific patient and lesion subsets, and the post-approval commitments of the sponsor.

CONCLUSIONS

Following panel discussions and the evidence presented, the panel voted for approval of the device.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在描述美国食品和药物管理局(FDA)循环系统设备小组在 Absorb 生物可吸收血管支架(BVS)系统的上市前批准申请会议上的讨论和建议。

背景

Absorb BVS 系统是首个完全生物可吸收的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗技术。Absorb BVS 在 ABSORB III(Absorb BVS 的临床评估,依维莫司洗脱生物可吸收血管支架治疗新发性原生冠状动脉病变的研究)试验中进行了研究,这是一项关键性的美国研究性器械豁免试验。

方法

对 2016 年 3 月 15 日举行的 FDA 循环系统设备小组上市前批准申请会议的观察性报告。

结果

美国 FDA 循环系统设备小组的成员审查了赞助商和 FDA 提交的 ABSROB III 试验结果和其他事后分析。ABSORB III 试验达到了主要终点,即与对照组 XIENCE 药物洗脱支架相比,Absorb BVS 在 1 年时的靶病变失败非劣效性。尽管 Absorb BVS 报告了更高的不良结果数值趋势,但 Absorb BVS 与 XIENCE 在靶病变失败或次要预先指定结果的任何安全性或有效性组成部分方面均无统计学差异。小组成员对 ABSORB III 结果和事后分析提出了关注,主要集中在试验的非劣效性设计、Absorb BVS 在小血管中的明显安全性问题、ABSORB III 中发现的血管大小的视觉与血管内成像评估之间的不匹配及其对适当设备标签的影响、特定患者和病变亚组中 Absorb BVS 的安全性以及赞助商的批准后承诺。

结论

在小组讨论和提出的证据之后,小组投票赞成批准该设备。

相似文献

1
Overview of the 2016 U.S. Food and Drug Administration Circulatory System Devices Advisory Panel Meeting on the Absorb Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold System.2016 年美国食品和药物管理局循环系统设备顾问小组会议概述:Absorb 生物可吸收血管支架系统。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Sep 12;9(17):1757-64. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2016.06.027.
2
Economic Outcomes of Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffolds Versus Everolimus-Eluting Stents in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: 1-Year Results From the ABSORB III Trial.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者中生物可吸收血管支架与依维莫司洗脱支架的经济学结局:ABSORB III 试验 1 年结果。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Apr 24;10(8):774-782. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2017.01.022.
3
Efficacy and Safety of the Absorb Everolimus-Eluting Bioresorbable Scaffold for Treatment of Patients With Diabetes Mellitus: Results of the Absorb Diabetic Substudy.Absorb 依维莫司洗脱可吸收生物降解支架治疗糖尿病患者的疗效和安全性:Absorb 糖尿病子研究结果。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Jan 9;10(1):42-49. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2016.10.019. Epub 2016 Dec 21.
4
Clinical outcomes at 2 years of the Absorb bioresorbable vascular scaffold versus the Xience drug-eluting metallic stent in patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome versus stable coronary disease-AIDA trial substudy.急性冠状动脉综合征与稳定型冠状动脉疾病患者中Absorb生物可吸收血管支架与Xience药物洗脱金属支架2年临床结局——AIDA试验子研究
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Jan;95(1):89-96. doi: 10.1002/ccd.28193. Epub 2019 Apr 9.
5
Efficacy and Safety of the Absorb Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold in Females and Males: Results of an Individual Patient-Level Pooled Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Absorb 生物可吸收血管支架在女性和男性中的疗效和安全性:一项随机对照试验的个体化患者水平汇总荟萃分析结果。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Sep 25;10(18):1881-1890. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2017.07.036.
6
Long-Term Efficacy and Safety of Everolimus-Eluting Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffolds Versus Everolimus-Eluting Metallic Stents: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials.长期疗效和安全性的依维莫司洗脱生物可吸收血管支架与依维莫司洗脱金属支架:随机临床试验的荟萃分析。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 May;10(5). doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.117.005286.
7
Long-Term Outcomes of Absorb Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold vs. Everolimus-Eluting Metallic Stent - A Randomized Comparison Through 5 Years in Japan.在日本通过 5 年的随机比较,可吸收生物可降解血管支架与依维莫司洗脱金属支架的长期结果。
Circ J. 2020 Apr 24;84(5):733-741. doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-19-1184. Epub 2020 Mar 26.
8
1-year clinical outcomes of diabetic patients treated with everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffolds: a pooled analysis of the ABSORB and the SPIRIT trials.依维莫司洗脱生物可吸收血管支架治疗糖尿病患者 1 年的临床结果:ABSORB 和 SPIRIT 试验的汇总分析。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 May;7(5):482-93. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2014.01.155. Epub 2014 Apr 16.
9
1-Year Outcomes of Everolimus-Eluting Bioresorbable Scaffolds Versus Everolimus-Eluting Stents: A Propensity-Matched Comparison of the GHOST-EU and XIENCE V USA Registries.依维莫司洗脱生物可吸收支架与依维莫司洗脱支架的1年结局:GHOST-EU和XIENCE V美国注册研究的倾向匹配比较
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Mar 14;9(5):440-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2015.10.042. Epub 2016 Jan 6.
10
The relationship of pre-procedural Dmax based sizing to lesion level outcomes in Absorb BVS and Xience EES treated patients in the AIDA trial.在AIDA试验中,接受Absorb生物可吸收血管支架(BVS)和Xience依维莫司洗脱支架(EES)治疗的患者,术前基于Dmax的尺寸选择与病变水平结局的关系。
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019 Jul;35(7):1189-1198. doi: 10.1007/s10554-019-01576-y. Epub 2019 Mar 25.

引用本文的文献

1
The impact of the use of bioresorbable vascular scaffolds and drug-coated balloons in coronary bifurcation lesions.生物可吸收血管支架和药物涂层球囊在冠状动脉分叉病变中的应用影响。
Egypt Heart J. 2019 Dec 16;71(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s43044-019-0033-z.
2
Undiscovered pathology of transient scaffolding t1remains a driver of failures in clinical trials.短暂支架t1未被发现的病理状况仍然是临床试验失败的一个驱动因素。
World J Cardiol. 2018 Oct 26;10(10):165-186. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v10.i10.165.
3
Mid-term outcomes of the Absorb BVS versus second-generation DES: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Absorb BVS 与第二代 DES 的中期结果:系统评价和荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2018 May 9;13(5):e0197119. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0197119. eCollection 2018.
4
Bioresorbable vascular scaffold versus metallic stent in percutaneous coronary intervention: results of the AIDA trial.生物可吸收血管支架与金属支架在经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中的比较:AIDA试验结果
J Community Hosp Intern Med Perspect. 2017 Oct 18;7(5):307-308. doi: 10.1080/20009666.2017.1374111. eCollection 2017.
5
Occurrence and management of bioresorbable vascular scaffold failure in real-life studies.现实生活研究中生物可吸收血管支架失败的发生与处理
J Thorac Dis. 2017 Aug;9(Suppl 9):S935-S939. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2017.06.82.
6
Bioresorbable scaffolds: should we stay simple or go complex?生物可吸收支架:我们应该保持简单还是走向复杂?
Cardiovasc Diagn Ther. 2017 Jun;7(3):E7-E12. doi: 10.21037/cdt.2017.01.07.